Request for new tag: fun / casual

Some people see this forum purely as a technical forum to solve problems or discuss applications, however some just like to have fun here and get involved in the community.
Which is why I think it would be great to have a new tag to mark a thread as just being for the fun of it. That way the people who are here for the technical part can blissfully ignore these threads.
In my opinion, the open chat category is not sufficient enough for this purpose, since it is also the only place to share your own scripts, applications and tutorials.

Case in point:

Which received a lot of negativity and apathy from some users, while receiving a positive response from others.

2 Likes

Soapbox - openSUSE Forums ??

Itā€™s already in the open chat area, which is a non-technical section of the forums - donā€™t know that a tag is necessary, but Iā€™ll chat with the other staff members and see what they think.

Thanks for the suggestion!

Unless there is some way that Iā€™m not seeing to not see purely social tags, Iā€™d rather not see the forum overly polluted with completely off topic stuff.

There are already no shortage of purely social services on the Internet, not everything has to turn into a social club.

4 Likes

My 2 cents: Please no. IMHO we have enough of that in Open-Chat and Soapbox/

2 Likes

Iā€™m with @mhurron and @knurpht on this particular issue, thereā€™s plenty of places for purely social interaction and/or s&^tposting.

1 Like

Discourse does let us allow tags only in specific categories - so we wouldnā€™t add it to the support categories, just the open chat category. You might notice in the open chat category, for example, that youā€™re neither required to add a tag nor are all the tags from the technical sections (I believe) available (some of them are, which may not really be necessary).

But the point of open chat is to have just a place to chat casually - so a tag specifying ā€˜funā€™ seems redundant to me.

In an ideal world that would be true, but it seems to me that even the open chat category is also for technical reasons only, for some users. I just thought a simple tag wouldnā€™t be too much work and would easily identify a non-technical thread as such.

I seem to have forgotten to mention this, but of course. The tag should only be available in the open chat and the soapbox category. The technical categories should stay as they are.

You can take your work seriously and have a sense of humor at the same time. Itā€™s not illegal. I used to work at one of the biggest oil companies in the world and during meetings it was a free for all that would reduce this forum to dust. The company is disgustingly successful even though they are laughing and having a good time. I think some toughening up is in order.

And the obvious: if you donā€™t like the content of a thread, STOP READING IT! Also not illegal.

2 Likes

We have a code of conduct that users are expected to follow, even in the chat areas. Become familiar with it and the community rules.

If you canā€™t live with it, the Internet is a big place. But our community standards will be enforced.

Consider this a reminder of the expectations here.

1 Like

If it doesnā€™t apply to everyone then itā€™s a classic case of tyranny. Do better.

It does, and if thereā€™s a post that you think needs to be reported, then report it. Thatā€™s how we do things here - not in a public discussion.

2 Likes

No, it doesnā€™t. Itā€™s so rude in here. And Iā€™m not going to report anyone for saying ā€œwordsā€ that I donā€™t personally like. Iā€™m not a baby.

1 Like

Then thatā€™s on you if you donā€™t help maintain the standard. Youā€™re still expected to abide by it.

1 Like

The problem is that a user canā€™t hide a category. So if you want to see more than just one category at a time, you look at the language top level category and get it all.

I would love to be able to not see Open Chat or Soapbox and filter out anything to do with Leap, but I canā€™t. So classifying something under another category doesnā€™t really solve any problem.

1 Like

Nothing is on me. Iā€™m a live and let live man. Words donā€™t hurt me and Iā€™m not a grass. Everyone hates a grass.

Thatā€™s exactly what I am aiming for. With the tag, someone like you could easily identify that a thread isnā€™t for them. However I think that the ability to hide a category would be too much work right now and would also be detrimental to all the ā€œseriousā€ threads in the open category section.

The search options let you do that - you can select specific categories to include in your search.

But I have put the question to staff as well, and if we get to some consensus, then weā€™ll take a look at it. We do appreciate the suggestion. :slight_smile:

Aside from that one thread, what exactly do people want to post thatā€™s fun/casual?


If itā€™s a bunch of memes and Anime, heck no. If itā€™s like osu!'s off-topic forum, also heck no.

Fun is fun, but Iā€™d assume openSUSE was a meme distro (more-so than Arch :p) and not bother with it if I saw any of that on latest topics.

As long as it doesnā€™t violate the Code of Conduct, thereā€™s nothing wrong with that if members of the community want to have those discussions here. Youā€™re not required to read them. :slight_smile:

A fair point, though, that the open chat stuff shouldnā€™t appear in ā€˜latest postsā€™. I think discourse can be set up to do that, but Iā€™ll have to look. If we implemented the ā€˜funā€™ tag, it wouldnā€™t be in the support areas, just in the open chat areas.

ETA: At the very least, users can mute categories theyā€™re not interested in, and they donā€™t show in the ā€˜categoriesā€™ or ā€˜latestā€™ views (I have non-English sections hidden, and Iā€™ve never seen anything from those categories in my lists).

1 Like