because this forum is technically for Help, and testing related issues. Soapbox it isn’t. Enough said.
Pleased to have the opportunity.
In spite of the KDE liveCD/HAL issue, I liked the very smooth installation process, with all the basics e.g language, time, keyboard, monitor, usable graphics (fbdev), sound, and that vital internet connection, all correctly installed.
Given the limitation of CD size, there was a further phase (on mine that is) with a large number of applications in Installation Summary to download. I was delighted to see a working unichrome graphics driver automatically placed in this list and installed with DRM/DRI working (a first with openSUSE on my h/w). The driver was automatically loaded and configured by X (no xorg.conf needed).
On adding a packman repo, many essential multimedia apps were added to Installation Summary awaiting my decision to install or not. That’s helpful to have the important apps pre-selected.
KDE on 11.3 appears to perform better (snappier and faster) than KDE on 11.2. Many improved KDE 4 apps, e.g. Amarok has a much improved GUI (at 2.3.0), and digiKam. Dolphin seems very quick now. Overall a big improvement over the earlier milestones that had some seriously buggy apps. No doubt the improvements are due to devs efforts over the last lap.
The availability of 11.3 LXDE pattern in YaST makes installation easier.
Although not tested yet, I understand that the 2.6.32 kernel is a prereq for using some features of my relatively new Lenovo notebook. It’s ok on 11.2, but with some annoying little issues.
Oh, I almost forgot to mention that useful facilities available in 11.2 are still there and working well in 11.3, such as SSH and VNC.
I suspect the innovation and hard work is tucked away under the hood where it belongs. Performance is everything, and there is plenty of it in 11.3.