Where might I find the libx11-dev packages for 16.0?
Thanks.
You posted in the 16 Beta category, which suggests you’re running it.
You should be running 16 RC, as it’s the most current.
@ionmich in openSUSE speak “-dev” equals “-devel”
Information for package libX11-devel:
-------------------------------------
Repository : repo-oss (16.0)
Name : libX11-devel
Version : 1.8.10-160000.2.2
Arch : x86_64
1 Like
Further to Malcolm’s response, the 32-bit version will be have “32bit” in the package name. A simple search for libx11 gives these results:
jhenderson@localhost:~> sudo zypper se libx11
[sudo] password for jhenderson:
Refreshing service 'openSUSE'.
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
S | Name | Summary | Type
---+------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+--------
i | libX11-6 | Core X11 protocol client library | package
| libX11-6-32bit | Core X11 protocol client library | package
i | libX11-data | Shared data for the Core X11 protocol library | package
| libX11-devel | Development files for the Core X11 protocol library | package
| libX11-devel-32bit | Development files for the Core X11 protocol library | package
| libX11-devel-doc | Manual pages for libX11 | package
i | libX11-xcb1 | XCB X11 protocol client library | package
| libX11-xcb1-32bit | XCB X11 protocol client library | package
| xorg-x11-libX11-ccache | X | package
jhenderson@localhost:~>
I have a question. If I installed the beta version then used “dup” on a daily basis would I not have the same as RC?
Thank you.
Thank you too. It clarifies things.
I actually used both zypper dup and up to be sure.
Show:
zypper lr -d and cat /etc/os-release - that should help us see what you have installed.
As requested.
localhost:/home/ion # zypper lr -d
# | Alias | Name | Enabled | GPG Check | Refresh | Keep | Priority | Type | URI | Service
--+--------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----------+---------+------+----------+--------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------
1 | brave-browser | Brave Browser | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | - | 99 | rpm-md | https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/x86_64 |
2 | https-download.opensuse.org-d4c4aad2 | https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/16.0/repo/oss/x86_64 | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | - | 99 | rpm-md | https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/16.0/repo/oss/x86_64 |
3 | openSUSE:repo-non-oss | repo-non-oss (16.0) | No | ---- | ---- | - | 99 | N/A | http://cdn.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/16.0/repo/non-oss/x86_64 | openSUSE
4 | openSUSE:repo-non-oss-debug | repo-non-oss-debug (16.0) | No | ---- | ---- | - | 99 | N/A | http://cdn.opensuse.org/debug/distribution/leap/16.0/repo/non-oss/x86_64 | openSUSE
5 | openSUSE:repo-openh264 | repo-openh264 (16.0) | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | - | 99 | rpm-md | http://codecs.opensuse.org/openh264/openSUSE_Leap_16 | openSUSE
6 | openSUSE:repo-oss | repo-oss (16.0) | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | - | 99 | rpm-md | http://cdn.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/16.0/repo/oss/x86_64 | openSUSE
7 | openSUSE:repo-oss-debug | repo-oss-debug (16.0) | No | ---- | ---- | - | 99 | N/A | http://cdn.opensuse.org/debug/distribution/leap/16.0/repo/oss/x86_64 | openSUSE
8 | openSUSE:repo-oss-source | repo-oss-source (16.0) | No | ---- | ---- | - | 99 | N/A | http://cdn.opensuse.org/source/distribution/leap/16.0/repo/oss | openSUSE
localhost:/home/ion #
localhost:/home/ion # cat /etc/os-release
NAME="openSUSE Leap"
VERSION="16.0"
ID="opensuse-leap"
ID_LIKE="suse opensuse"
VERSION_ID="16.0"
PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Leap 16.0"
ANSI_COLOR="0;32"
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:leap:16.0"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org"
HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org/"
DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Leap"
LOGO="distributor-logo-Leap"
localhost:/home/ion #
That looks the same as the installation of the RC I did today (using the build 163.2 installation ISO downloaded about a week ago). You’re probably fine. I’ve added a leap16-rc tag and changed it to that (I thought we had one, but apparently we didn’t).
Something I did want to mention, just in case someone feels the need to pick a nit - the 32-bit library is an i586 library, not an i386 library. Modern linux kernels don’t run on the 386 family of processors, and as such, the libraries will have been updated to i586 as well. The 32bit designator is what you need for something that needs a 32-bit library; i386 is not something anything gets built against these days unless older kernels are used.