Did any one see this
https://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads/2013/intelr-linux-graphics-installer-version-1.0.1
tried it?
Did any one see this
https://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads/2013/intelr-linux-graphics-installer-version-1.0.1
tried it?
On Tue 04 Jun 2013 04:06:01 AM CDT, caf4926 wrote:
Did any one see this
http://tinyurl.com/nopz8vv
tried it?
Hi
I lookd at it, but the Xorg repo (last time I looked) seems to be more
up to date with the various packages…
–
Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890)
openSUSE 12.3 (x86_64) Kernel 3.7.10-1.11-desktop
up 6:42, 3 users, load average: 0.06, 0.11, 0.09
CPU AMD Athlon™ II P360@2.30GHz | GPU Mobility Radeon HD 4200
Yes
And reading the comments. It sounds like it’s not working well for many.
It appears to be specific to Ubuntu and Fedora wrt packaging.
They have a faq page here: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/documentation/faq
I note this link with more detail: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads/2013/2013q1-intel-graphics-stack-release
I note they currently refer to these component packages:
and they have this to say about bugs:
There are important known fixed bugs and performance improvements coming on newest individual components releases that weren’t included in this stack release.
- Mesa - 9.1.1 contains important fixes and performance improvements compared to 9.1 validated in this stack
- xf86-video-intel 2.21.5 contains important fixes for HSW like “Fix scanline waits for Haswell” and “Fix Haswell CRW PCI-IDs”
All these fixes and improvements will be included and validated only on next stack release 2013Q2.
The validation hardware list has this:
There is (and will be) some Intel graphic hardware in our household. My wife’s Lenovo has an HD Graphics 3000 (Sandy Bridge) with a different Core i5 CPU than the one listed. I’ve purchased a Toshiba Ultrabook with an HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge) with a different Core i7 CPU than the one listed. But I suspect it would be month(s) before I attempted playing with what is to me an unknown driver ‘packaging’.