After 4 month update cycle and trustation I gave up and moved forward to next distro. I installed Kubuntu. Kubuntu ships with KDE too, so user experience is much alike openSUSE, but runs smoother. A lot of functions work out of box, Kubuntu offers more software packages, updates so far without problems and it uses grub.
On Sat 19 Jan 2013 03:36:02 PM CST, jalomann wrote:
After 4 month update cycle and trustation I gave up and moved forward to
next distro. I installed Kubuntu. Kubuntu ships with KDE too, so user
experience is much alike openSUSE, but runs smoother. A lot of functions
work out of box, Kubuntu offers more software packages, updates so far
without problems and it uses grub.
It is worth trying.
Jalo
Hi
The one good thing about linux, choice
Enjoy your new linux environment and remember to have fun!
–
Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890)
openSUSE 12.2 (x86_64) Kernel 3.4.11-2.16-desktop
up 2 days 18:27, 6 users, load average: 0.01, 0.06, 0.08
CPU Intel® i5 CPU M520@2.40GHz | GPU Intel® Ironlake Mobile
Citation unlikely for such an opinion, but an explanation as to what is smoother than what, would be nice.
I think Debian may have more packages on offer than openSUSE or any distro, but it’s no big deal unless the extras are so important. Again more explanation from the OP is required to make any sense of it.
Kubuntu is a good distro, for daily end user usage. But, dear all, did I find out the difference when having to do the next things on both an openSUSE and a Kubuntu install on the same machine:
Setup NIS
Setup NFS
On openSUSE:
Yast - NIS server - enter some data - click OK, done
Yast - NFS server - enter some data - click OK, done
What is the deal with the grub2 haters? I know I am wading into deep water here but really this is a good modern program. There is no need to thrash about because you do not understand a new boot loader. It works well and thats it, no big deal.
I would not change a distro over the boot loader, I would just learn the boot loader.
Besides does the new kubuntu really use grub, I thought they moved to grub2 a couple of versions ago.
I don’t think this is about grub v. grub2. The OP [and his hardware] seems more comfortable with debian/ubuntu based systems and he also runs Mint. So, going with Kubuntu is unsurprising. For some strange reason, he appears to expect that other distros should do things their way.
I have multibooted with Kubuntu in the past when it happened to have better support for a graphics chip in my desktop pc, and openSUSE didn’t for a release or two. It was still supported and funded by Ubuntu then. It performed well but its KDE was raw and not specially integrated, a distro without a character of its own. Someone once described it as the unloved stepchild of Ubuntu, which seemed a pretty fair description at the time.
The last time I used kubuntu was when it was at version 7.04 and from my experience it worked better if you installed ubuntu, removed all the gnome packages and installed KDE