On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:46:02 +0000, elwis wrote:
> Hi Jim, glad to hear you.
>
> First of all, the way I see it there’s two goals with building a free
> training/class community. Spread the openSuSE brand and share knowledge
> among users.
> (that’s why I would like to call it “beginning python programming on
> openSuSE” not on “Linux”)
I have often viewed training materials as marketing materials of a sort -
though with more in-depth technical detail than you’d find in traditional
“marketing fluff” - ie, light on fluff, high on content. But from the
standpoint of name recognition (in particular), it’s very important.
> About the topics, I suppose it depends on what people would like to
> write, or would Novell do the hard work? Obvious topics would be
> installing/configuring openSuSE, chapters about configuring the desktop,
> setting up a homeserver etc
Knowing the workload the course development team is under (since the team
reports to the same manager that I do), it would be a community effort,
but I could get advice on some good instructional design practices to
incorporate into the project. That would make for materials that were
teachable.
From a format standpoint, there’s a number of options - ranging from
print books (for which the project would need to find a publisher or fund
self-publishing - the Blender project has done something like this so
could be a template).
That type of format lends itself to “classroom” style learning, but that
may not be ideal for a community project - though as something that could
be used as a “canned” presentation for LUG meetings, that could be useful
and an easier-to-consume format. That would result in modules that were
at most a couple of hours long rather than, say, a 4-day class (which
would require an instructor, classroom, computers, and other resources).
But there are other formats as well - for example, at Novell, we are
really heavy into “On Demand” using Moodle Rooms. The sessions are pre-
recorded and include demonstrations and a workbook for labs, but the
student has to set things up for the labs.
Combined with something like SUSE Studio, though, installation/
configuration for doing the labs would actually be fairly trivial to do
because the environment could be a pre-built VM set up using Studio.
> Others could be more general, as I said, but pushing the openSuSE brand.
> “Developing ASP .NET on openSuSE”, “Graphical Design on openSuSE”,
> “Multimedia …”
Some of these would also be good ideas to include - though for something
like python development (from your earlier example), from a learning
perspective, I think the more generic course would be preferred by the
audience. That doesn’t mean, though, the community couldn’t develop
courses along these lines and have a “SUSE Flavour” to them, license
under Creative Commons and let other distros leverage the work this
proposed team would do.
> Specifying a certain distro will also assure that people will get going.
> There’s nothing more frustrating then a “Getting started” guide where
> you fail at step two. In the diversed land of the penguin I’m afraid
> this happens too often.
This is very true. Extending the original concept of the project to more
generic topics does allow for a broader range of topics to be covered
with (as I seaid earlier) a “SUSE Flavour” - as long as the knowledge is
portable to other distros. From a student perspective, portability of
knowledge is highly valued if a skill applies across multiple platforms.
> Anyway, when the happy student finish his course, a nice pdf diploma
> will arrive in his mailbox (always reward)and he is a little bit more
> confident doing daily work in his distro of choice.
Sure - a course completion certificate is something that could be put
together, along with actual testing. Looking from a testing perspective,
though, the ideal would be what in the testing business (which is my
specific role in Novell’s training business, though I’ve done instruction
and course development as well) we call a “high stakes” exam - ie, a
proctored exam that is closed-book. Test publishing is somewhat
expensive to do, though - costing several thousand dollars per exam.
However, as it happens, I’m attending a conference next week for the
Association of Test Publishers, and will have the opportunity to chat
with many testing publishers. I could see what options are available
from that standpoint, of course with the caveat that this is still very
early at this point, but that we’re just looking to see what options are
available.
Jim
–
Jim Henderson, CNA6, CDE, CNI, LPIC-1, CLA10, CLP10
Novell Technical Training