Hi! 
After the last update, I received this error message: “There is no update candidate for flash-player-11.2.202.425-2.17.1.x86_64”, and a prompt to report it.
OK! I’m reporting it.
Now what?
I’m using Open SUSE 13.2 x64 KDE.
TIA!
G.
Please post your repo list:
zypper lr -d
Does “zypper patch” work?
THANKS wolfi! 
Ehm…what’s zypper patch?
Anyway, zypper gives this repo infos:
giorgos@G-PC:~> zypper lr -d
# | Alias | Name | Enabled | Refresh | Priority | Type | URI | Service
---+-----------------------------+------------------------------------+---------+---------+----------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
1 | ftp.gwdg.de-suse | Packman Repository | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/packman/suse/openSUSE_13.2/ |
2 | home:Nemton | home:Nemton | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/Nemton/openSUSE_13.2/ |
3 | home:PunisherHD:trinity-r14 | home:PunisherHD:trinity-r14 | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/PunisherHD:/trinity-r14/openSUSE_13.2/ |
4 | home:ecsos | home:ecsos | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/ecsos/openSUSE_13.2/ |
5 | libdvdcss repository | libdvdcss repository | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://opensuse-guide.org/repo/13.2/ |
6 | nVidia Graphics Drivers | nVidia Graphics Drivers | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.nvidia.com/opensuse/13.2/ |
7 | repo-debug | openSUSE-13.2-Debug | No | No | 99 | NONE | http://download.opensuse.org/debug/distribution/13.2/repo/oss/ |
8 | repo-debug-update | openSUSE-13.2-Update-Debug | No | No | 99 | NONE | http://download.opensuse.org/debug/update/13.2/ |
9 | repo-debug-update-non-oss | openSUSE-13.2-Update-Debug-Non-Oss | No | No | 99 | NONE | http://download.opensuse.org/debug/update/13.2-non-oss/ |
10 | repo-non-oss | openSUSE-13.2-Non-Oss | Yes | Yes | 99 | yast2 | http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/13.2/repo/non-oss/ |
11 | repo-oss | openSUSE-13.2-Oss | Yes | Yes | 99 | yast2 | http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/13.2/repo/oss/ |
12 | repo-source | openSUSE-13.2-Source | No | No | 99 | NONE | http://download.opensuse.org/source/distribution/13.2/repo/oss/ |
13 | repo-update | openSUSE-13.2-Update | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/update/13.2/ |
14 | repo-update-non-oss | openSUSE-13.2-Update-Non-Oss | Yes | Yes | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/update/13.2-non-oss/ |
giorgos@G-PC:~>
A command to install all official “patches” from the update repo.
Anyway, zypper gives this repo infos:
Your repos shouldn’t cause a problem.
What flash-player do you actually have installed?
rpm -qi flash-player
Maybe you do not have flash-player installed at all, but rather freshplayer-plugin (Google’s V16 pepper-flash) from Packman?
In that case, I’d suggest to mark the flash-player patch as “Taboo – Never install” in YaST->Online Update (right-click on the update in the left list), or install flash-player instead of freshplayer-plugin.
Still, “sudo zypper patch” should give a more detailed description of the problem, and allow you to solve the conflict.
Or try to install the updates with YaST->Online Update.
Well…here we are:
giorgos@G-PC:~> rpm -qi flash-player
Name : flash-player
Version : 11.2.202.425
Release : 2.17.1
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Κυρ 14 Δεκ 2014 12:33:18 πμ EET
Group : Productivity/Networking/Web/Browsers
Size : 21899457
License : SUSE-NonFree
Signature : RSA/SHA256, Παρ 12 Δεκ 2014 02:23:05 μμ EET, Key ID b88b2fd43dbdc284
Source RPM : flash-player-11.2.202.425-2.17.1.nosrc.rpm
Build Date : Παρ 12 Δεκ 2014 11:03:42 πμ EET
Build Host : cloud121
Relocations : (not relocatable)
Packager : http://bugs.opensuse.org
Vendor : openSUSE
URL : http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
Summary : Adobe Flash Plugin and Standalone Player
Description :
This package contains Adobe's Flash Plugin for the supported Web
browsers in addition to a standalone flash player application.
Distribution: openSUSE 13.2
giorgos@G-PC:~>
G-PC:~ # zypper patch
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Resolving package dependencies...
Nothing to do.
G-PC:~ #
-
Online update, couldn’t find any package for updating.
-
I have installed:
a)|[TABLE]
|
[TR]
[TD]flash-player - Adobe Flash Plugin and Standalone Player
|
11.2.202.425-2.17.1-x86_64 from openSUSE
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
b) flash-player-kde4 - Adobe Flash Plugin and Standalone Player Settings
11.2.202.425-2.17.1-x86_64 from openSUSE
c) pullin-flash-player - Placeholder for Adobe Flash PlugIn
12.3-6.4.1-x86_64 from openSUSE
You already have the latest flash-player update installed, so no wonder that no update is not found and cannot be installed.
So the updater still shows you the update?
Right-click on the icon and choose “Check for new updates” and it should hopefully vanish.
Indeed!
Then the problem solved. rotfl!
THANKS AGAIN!!!
On 2014-12-13 23:46, Thalassius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> After the last update, I received this error message: “There is no
> update candidate for flash-player-11.2.202.425-2.17.1.x86_64”, and a
> prompt to report it.
> OK! I’m reporting it.
I see you solved your issue, but just for clarification, a comment. The
forums and mail lists are not an official place for “reports”, but a
place where users meet and help one another.
For reporting, understood as reporting bugs, generalized problems, you
have to report on Bugzilla: openSUSE:Submitting bug reports
But you did the right thing, asking here
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 “Bottle” at Telcontar)
Indeed! I could report the updater (?) issue, but I can’t reproduce it and I’m not sure for the in-between steps until the problem solved, so I’m not sure what exactly to report.
I think I’ll skip this time and I’ll file a report in the case of reapearance of this problem.
Bye!
G.
On 2014-12-14 16:36, Thalassius wrote:
>
> Indeed! I could report the updater (?) issue, but I can’t reproduce it
> and I’m not sure for the in-between steps until the problem solved, so
> I’m not sure what exactly to report.
> I think I’ll skip this time and I’ll file a report in the case of
> reapearance of this problem.
Yes, bugzillas are for things that can be reproduced and investigated,
or at least with proving documentation.
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 “Bottle” at Telcontar)