In packman is gstreamer-plugins-bad 1.12.5-4.4 and in openSUSE repo is 1.14.1-1.1.
That is the reason for this error.
What I did not understand - why zypper want to upgrade to a version with a small number?
Since you ask in your sig, Iâll have to correct you here. AFAIU youâre talking about âadditionsâ not about âaddictionsâ, even though people have called me an openSUSE junky
If you are referring to your own earlier post in this thread, then that was because the command you used forced a switch to packman. I did not do that, and I saw it going to the higher version number (but switching from packman to opensuse repo).
Thanks for your explanations.
If I understand well:
If I switch once to packman (with zypper dup --from packman), it is enough. From this time the vendor is changed to packman and if I will use the same command will be a âforceâ one (I tell zypper to use packman packages even if they are a small number).
Today there are no more addictions, so when there are you wait, or do as you said Knurpht
https://forums.opensuse.org/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by **Knurpht** https://forums.opensuse.org/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png](https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php?p=2867616#post2867616)
No, that's not completely it, but it should keep you on the safe side. If conflicts arise, use the --allow-vendor-change.
I will be starting with Tumbleweed in about 2 weeks. At the moment I read all I can find, this includes this thread.
Can somebody recapture the TW upgrade proces, cause it seems not everyone is doing it in the same way. The more I read in this thread the more confusing it got.
It seems to me I will be needing the packman repo, next to the ânormalâ ones to be able to do the most common things on my PC.
What do I do with priorities and with the vendor change attribute? What is the safest way to handle the upgrades?
Or should I enable packman, install some software from it and then disable it again? Is that wise?
That way upgrading could simply be done with zypper dup, right? That is what I see mentioned on several openSUSE webpages.
Sorry for asking so much, but it made me confused, reading about the different ways forum members use to upgrade.
Likely summarizing and hopefully clarifying advice about PackmanâŚ
Do not modify repo priority values, any changes can mess things up and arenât likely to improve anything.
Add the Packman repo for packages containing apps and codecs that have restrictive licenses because openSUSE policy is very strict not providing packages with those kinds of licenses.
You add the Packman repo with the special âdup --fromâ command to ensure packages from the Packman repo have priority over packages in other repos, but this is not the same as modifying the repo priority numbers. Why do you want to do this? You want dependencies for an app to come from the same place for better reliability.
Leave the Packman repo enabled to continue to receive updates, this is why you add the Packman with the âdup --fromâ command.
My personal choice is to set the âpackmanâ priority to a lower number (higher priority). The standard repos have a priority of 99. So I set packman to have a priority of 97.
Thank you @TSU,
This makes it much clearer in a, if I may say so, very simple way.
Two questions pop to mind though cause I have been reading about it last night on the following website: https://en.opensuse.org/Additional_package_repositories#Packma
Question 1:
Is it normal to add the complete Packman repo or just 1 or 2 subsets of it? That is if I donât need packages from the other subsets of course.
Question 2:
To update (or better upgrade) TW I use:
zypper dup
or do I use it with the --(no) vendor change option? I read that zypper dup has as default the no vendor change option so I guess I can just use it without options.
Apologies for no using quotes to format parts of this post. I type this on my phone and I donât see where and how to do that on the mobile version of the website.
Thank you again, I hope I will be able to get it all working, and keep it working, in a few weeks.