Just want to know which difference. Compairing on the net looks too simple and often contain worth information, which real difference bettween this distros in using ?
In my opinion … the question asked is an overly-broad question … there are too many “what about this xxxx” and “what about this yyyy” and “what about this zzzz”, etc. sub-questions.
Very specific criteria needs to be specified to keep a well-defined focus on the answers.
( And BTW, this should not be in " Install/Boot/Login" … I think it should be in “Open Chat” ).
I do not think it matters much. People only look at file there using links in the forums, etc. They (normally) do not browse there. Thus those who put spam there are wasting their effort.
One thing I failed to suggest in my first Reply … I suggest that you install the different Linux OS’es in a virtual machine … then do the testing yourself to see how each OS works for you.
Everyone has different work habits at a computer, so using each OS with your own habits will be a great way to make a decision which is “best”. 
1 Like
Sorry, my answer above belongs to another topic./thread. Forget it.
1 Like
It is not spam
Share all what you think!
My computer dislike VMs
For me the main problem in the different distros is package system. In Arch you cannot withou virtual env use pip, for some codeblocks users in arch codeblocks does not work properly.
When I develop LO, I need install libraries packages.I want to use package system , which have all apps , as libreoffice(what’s why I dislike AlmaLinux),in which I can free switch to other DE/WM/compositor and easily install it(In EndeavourOS I can do that, is it possible in OpenSuse?).
Poor you. Use LIVE-images instead (or teach your computer how to behave 
).
The simple difference between EndeavourOS and openSUSE is that EndeavourOS is a rolling distro based on Arch which uses the KDE desktop while openSUSE provides a range of rolling and non-rolling distros with quite a wide choice of desktops. I don’t know anyone who uses Fedora but my understanding is that it is a non-rolling distro.
1 Like
A simple Google search gives you a good start in the AI answer to ask specific questions, not just this generic one which is frankly a very lazy approach.
1 Like
It sort of might as well be, with releases every October(November) & April(May). Kernels provided in its releases stay close on the heels of upstream pretty much of the time. Until this past week, 43 (last fall) & 44 (newest) both were using the same x.x.03 newer X11 than TW, after more than a year of being well behind.
While both Fedora and openSUSE are rpm-based, their wrappers, DNF vs. zypper, are very different critters. DNF provides multiple man pages and plugins to get confused by, while zypper is pretty well integrated into one man page with one binary. DNF completely hides packages you don’t want messed with via its crude locking mechanism, while zypper makes no secret of locked packages’ existence, with a sensible and easy to use locking system, e.g. ignoring wildcard locks instead of removing them when you’ve attempted to install or remove involved packages and agree to “remove” or “install”, so leaving the actual locks undisturbed.
A simple DuckDuckGo search … 
- Or Ecosia –
- Or, the Vivaldi Search Engine – if, you’re using the Vivaldi Browser …
Stefan, the company “SoftMaker” which is located not too far from SUSE’s Nürnberg office, has a „Freitag Punkt 12” Blog which recently addressed the issue of how Web Browsers are financed …
- No prizes will be given for correctly guessing who’s funding a large portion of the Web Browser development costs …
duckduckgo doesn’t use IPv6, results from bing, the results are full of bad SEO. Gave up on it, spent more time micromanaging ublacklist lists than searching with it.
You could always take a look at Distrowatch which has lots of info. / reviews & ranks Distros by downloads.
That is wrong and it is even documented. It is only clicks which are counted. Distrowatch cannot count any download numbers.
The DistroWatch Page Hit Ranking statistics have attracted plenty of attention and feedback over the years. Originally, each distribution-specific page was pure HTML with a third-party counter at the bottom to monitor interest of visitors. In May 2004 the site switched from publicly viewable third-party counters to internal counters. This was prompted by a continuous abuse of the counters by a handful of undisciplined individuals who had confused DistroWatch with a poll station. The counters are no longer displayed on the individual distributions pages, but all visits are logged. Only one hit per IP address per day is counted.
The DistroWatch Page Hit Ranking statistics are a light-hearted way of measuring interest in Linux distributions and other free operating systems among the visitors of this website. They correlate neither to usage nor to quality and should not be used to measure the market share of distributions. They simply show the number of times a distribution page on DistroWatch was accessed each day, nothing more.
The tables below display the average number of page hits for each distribution over a given period of time. To see information on page hit trends over a set period of time, please see our Page Hit Ranking Trends page. To see how our readers rank distributions based on visitor-submitted ratings, please see our Ranking page.
The figures in the third column of each table represent the average number of hits per day (HPD) for the specified period. The tables are updated daily at around 30 minutes past midnight GMT.
2 Likes
Ah yes my mistake.