Where is openSUSE 16?

I fell in love with SUSE back in the 1990’s , when I first installed it … logged on and was told … “Have a lot of fun …”. Had my little sister been hovering over my shoulder, she would have said something like … “that is SOOOO cheesy”. And she would have been on the money! Nonetheless, I have had a lot of fun!

Roughly a year ago, I was disappointed to learn that SUSE as I knew it was going away, that 15.5 would be the end of the line. BAD marketing from openSUSE to say the least! Instead of upgrading to 15.5, I installed bookworm, also known as Debian 12. Debian is fantastic! A real lesson is the meaning of the word “Stable”. And a real lesson in what I missed from openSUSE!

  1. zypper … can anyone really enjoy gnu/linuzx without “zypper ps -s”? I can NOT!

  2. A genuinely decent default user environment, including the ever present reminder to have a lot of fun! I am not and have never been completely satisfied with the default setup, but simply copying /home/ox/svn/env/trunk/env/bash.bashrc.local to /etc/bash.bashrc.local restored perfection. For the curious mice:

export EDITOR=vi
set -o vi
#HISTSIZE=2000

##
##  tput Color Capabilities:
##
##      tput setab [1-7] – Set a background color using ANSI escape
##      tput setb [1-7] – Set a background color
##      tput setaf [1-7] – Set a foreground color using ANSI escape
##      tput setf [1-7] – Set a foreground color
##      tput Text Mode Capabilities:
##
##      tput bold – Set bold mode
##      tput dim – turn on half-bright mode
##      tput smul – begin underline mode
##      tput rmul – exit underline mode
##      tput rev – Turn on reverse mode
##      tput smso – Enter standout mode (bold on rxvt)
##      tput rmso – Exit standout mode
##      tput sgr0 – Turn off all attributes
##
##  Color Code for tput:
##
##      0 – Black
##      1 – Red
##      2 – Green
##      3 – Yellow
##      4 – Blue
##      5 – Magenta
##      6 – Cyan
##      7 – White

# set up vars for making appropreate prompts bold and w/ color
# The "-Txterm" option is needed so tput won't complain when invoked
# by rsync.

_norm=$(tput -Txterm sgr0)
_bold=$(tput -Txterm bold)
_color=""
_p=""

if test "$UID" -eq 0  ; then
    _p="# "
    _color=$(tput -Txterm setaf 1)
else
    _p="$ "
    #_color=$(tput setaf 4)
    _color=$(tput -Txterm setaf 2) #for dark background
fi

PS1="\[${_color}\]\u@\h${_p}\[${_norm}\]"
unset _p _color _bold _norm

# If this is an xterm set the title to user@host:dir
case "$TERM" in
xterm*|rxvt*)
    PS1="\[\e]0;\u@\h: \w\a\]$PS1"
    ;;
*)
    ;;
esac
  1. YaST! There are three distinct types of installers for gnu/linux. Genuinely good, SUCK, and unusable. Sadly, most installers fall into the third bucket. In spite of the fact that gnu/linux has been around and stable for decades, only one distribution has a genuinely good installer. I am a hardcore geek … I can make even the shiftiest software install … but should anyone work that hard just to get an os to boot? REALLY??? Decades of gnu/linux and still only one genuinely good installer. My my my …

Which brings me back to what I really want to say! Where is the “topic” or “category” or whatever for Leap 16? How can I contribute, test, etc. I have read a few articles about “ALPS” and still have no idea what it means. But the one thing I have learned over the last year or so … Leap won’t happen unless we make it happen … and we includes me … soooo …

Please see the ‘Release Team’ link in the lefthand sidebar. That page has lots of useful information including how to get involved etc.

1 Like

Thanks!

And I forgot to mention rpmbuild … I spent a full year on debian without ever figuring out a reliable and easy way to build deb packages. That is the only thing I genuinely dislike about debian. The “easy” equivalents to rpmbuild don’t actually work very well. Builds tend to fail during the “test” stage, even if no code has been changed.