Vote to choose the tags to go with post counts

Hi Ken,

Thanks for the compliment.
Happy new year to everyone.

Please I beg you :cry: please vote for my entry. I promise to help the world rise from this recession.lol!. I will help opensuse conquer the computer world.:cool:

Cheers,
conram

Folks, those were just politicians promises .:shake:

Just goes to show how gullible we are. Here I was thinking you could actually live up to all those promises:nerd:

Politicians!
I wonder why it is, when we know they are full of ‘brown/steaming stuff’, we even bother:yawn:

Hey, we are luvin’ the humor conram

Think they should stay as they are post numbers don’t really mean much it’s the quality of the posts that counts IMHO

/Geoff

True.

But isn’t the Poll about ‘Names’ really.

There is a correlation between the two, the name we are given and the post count, but that will always be the case, unless we change the whole methodology.

It’s neck and neck folks. Will swerdna’s Susers overtake the forces of conservatism and their old and worn out favourites? Just 3 votes in it.

Or will the dark horse (lizard?) ridden by chevyinasia be the swooper in the home straight to overrun swerdna’s susers and clip the evil status quo at the post!

It’s a thrill a minute at the track.

I can’t say I’m terribly fond of your skullish avatar, but it would be really cute if you gave it a RW&B cap and maybe a bow-tie, you know, like the old US “Uncle Sam” character? :wink:

It’s tough to vote for a list that includes “Cool Dude”, Go FoC!!

Cmon – be wild, be free again!

Holy Moses – I’m a furriner! Spare me the S&S!

And be respectful of Lucy, she’s a rele, very fond of her (the avatar).

  • zak89 wrote, On 01/02/2009 06:36 PM:
    > I can’t say I’m terribly fond of your skullish avatar

Hey, nothing wrong with skullish avatars! :slight_smile:

Uwe

Hey, nothing wrong with skullish avatars! :slight_smile:

lol! Forgot about yours! That’s a good one!

Keep it the way it is… If it ain’t broke don’t fix it :slight_smile:

Save us. Conservatism wins again. Reactionaries abound. Oh woe!

I guess it’s not really that important John. A bit of fun really. It’s not closed yet though is it!

So long as we try and maintain the very best support we can according to our individual circumstances - That’s what users really need.

Some of us of course are old hands and had much under our belt from before the forums were amalgamated - Only to have our post count re-set to zero. So the post count doesn’t tell all.

I’m not really concerned. It all a bit of fun really. It’s quite interesting that the current tags were devised in fun to belittle/downgrade or bring to earth the concept of tags, to stop ppl getting confused about the importance of tags I suppose, and that seems to be working, and lightening the place up a bit.

Hello again folks. It looks like the poll closed automatically about a week ago. And the winner is:

Keep the set that we have already

Well youall know what I think about that!

Thanks to everyone who participated. We’ve got a fine community spirit going here.

So I must bow to the will of the people and declare that the tags remain unchanged until the next vote later this year (I’ll get rid of them yet!!).

Oh in interim, everyone could have a vote, and ideas for a more fun tag than “Global Moderator”.

That could be fun outlet for all that stifled creativity.

Somewhere I’ve made a promise to revisit the little green graphics that go near the avatars. That’s next – maybe in a week or so time. I think for the time being I’m over the naming thing now – need some time back in the cave relaxing with a keyboard and some code. mutter… mutter…

OK, so did we add another to the Original List??

My post just clocked 4K

and Now I’m a ‘Flux Capacitor Pengin’

but the spelling is wrong!!

Flux Capacitor Penguin