As we have a new naming convention for OpenSUSE pre-releases, shouldn’t the
name of this newsgroup be changed? Perhaps the “-beta” could simply be
dropped or how about “opensuse.org.help.prerelease-milestone-x”?
–
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy
“I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.”
Graham P Davis wrote:
> As we have a new naming convention for OpenSUSE pre-releases, shouldn’t the
> name of this newsgroup be changed? Perhaps the “-beta” could simply be
> dropped or how about “opensuse.org.help.prerelease-milestone-x”?
I don’t see the point in having one for every milestone. I know that web
forum users like that, but they can’t come up with descriptive subject
lines anyway.
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 08:42 +0000, Graham P Davis wrote:
> As we have a new naming convention for OpenSUSE pre-releases, shouldn’t the
> name of this newsgroup be changed? Perhaps the “-beta” could simply be
> dropped or how about “opensuse.org.help.prerelease-milestone-x”?
>
??? It’s just a name. I would rather have things stay relatively
constant then changing them everytime you turn around.
What if a few years down the road openSUSE decides to call them
prerelease-beta’s??
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 08:42 +0000, Graham P Davis wrote:
>> As we have a new naming convention for OpenSUSE pre-releases, shouldn’t
the
>> name of this newsgroup be changed? Perhaps the “-beta” could simply be
>> dropped or how about “opensuse.org.help.prerelease-milestone-x”?
>>
>
> ??? It’s just a name. I would rather have things stay relatively
> constant then changing them everytime you turn around.
>
> What if a few years down the road openSUSE decides to call them
> prerelease-beta’s??
I wonder what else I could do to indicate that I was attempting to be
slightly humorous here? Obviously, a single smiley wasn’t enough.
As it looks as though everyone wants to be really serious about this, I
think that dropping the “-beta” is sufficient. Even without the change of
naming system, “prerelease-beta” seems rather tautological and “prerelease”
would seem sufficient - and where is “prerelease-alpha”?
–
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy
“I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.”
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 20:22 +0000, Graham P Davis wrote:
…
> As it looks as though everyone wants to be really serious about this, I
> think that dropping the “-beta” is sufficient. Even without the change of
> naming system, “prerelease-beta” seems rather tautological and “prerelease”
> would seem sufficient - and where is “prerelease-alpha”?
Sorry… I fell for it. I mean this isn’t just usenet anymore… we have people posting via forums. I don’t expect the level of experience to be all that great anymore.