System won't retain display size setting in SAX2

System won’t retain 16:9 display size setting in YaST (SaX2). I’m using SuSE 11.1 (64 bit).

SaX2 settings as follows:

Monitor is Samsung Syncmaster XL2370-1 (digital). Resolution is set to 1920X1080 (1080p). Diagonal measurement set to 23 inches. Display size indicates 509 m.m. X 286 m.m. (20 3/8" X 11 1/2").

Aspect ratio is entered as 16:9, but after saving and restarting computer it keeps coming back as 16:10.

Samsung literature says 16:9, and measurements above confirm this.

So why does it keep going back to 16:10, and how can I get it to retain 16:9? (Same thing happens on another computer, also running SuSE 11.1, and with a second of these same monitors.)

Many thanks for your guidance.
Socref

Just trying to get a handle on this problem.

  1. I assume the actual native resolution 1920x1080 is respected, just false reporting of aspect ratio by sax2?

  2. What graphics chipset and driver do you have?

  3. Does this affect the actual desktop display (eg anything cropped)?

In reply:

  1. I assume the native resolution is being respected. (How can I tell if it is not?)

  2. I see the following in “My Computer” and in YaST2. (If you need other information please tell me where to find it.)

Display Info
Vendor: nVidia Corporation
Model: GeForce 8200
Driver: nvidia (3D Support)

nvidia-gfxG02-kmp-default
x11-video-nvidiaG02

  1. Nothing appears to have been cropped.

Thx!
socref

  1. I assume the native resolution is being respected. (How can I tell if it is not?)
xrandr

will report current and other available display modes.

I note your using the nvidia proprietary driver. Use the ‘nvidia-settings’ utility, rather than ‘sax2’ to adjust your display settings.

Thanks for reply, Deano.

I typed “nvidia-settings” into the console. I assume that’s what you meant. But I don’t see anywhere to set 16:9. Am I missing something in one of those screens?

Output of xrandr is as follows:
gil@phred:~> xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 175, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 1920 x 1080
default connected 1920x1080+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1920x1080 50.0*
1680x1050 51.0
1400x1050 52.0 65.0
1600x900 53.0
1280x1024 54.0 67.0 68.0
1440x900 55.0 64.0
1280x960 56.0 69.0
1280x800 57.0
1152x864 58.0
1280x720 59.0
1024x768 60.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 73.0 74.0
800x600 61.0 87.0 88.0 89.0 90.0 91.0 92.0
93.0 94.0 95.0
640x480 62.0 105.0 106.0 107.0 108.0 109.0 110.0
1680x945 63.0
1368x768 66.0
1024x576 75.0
960x720 76.0 77.0
960x600 78.0
960x540 79.0
928x696 80.0 81.0
896x672 82.0 83.0
840x525 84.0
840x472 85.0
832x624 86.0
800x450 96.0
720x450 97.0
720x400 98.0
700x525 99.0 100.0
684x384 101.0
640x512 102.0 103.0 104.0
640x400 111.0 112.0
640x360 113.0
640x350 114.0
576x432 115.0
512x384 116.0 117.0 118.0 119.0 120.0
416x312 121.0
400x300 122.0 123.0 124.0 125.0 126.0
360x200 127.0
320x240 128.0 129.0 130.0 131.0
320x200 132.0
320x175 133.0
gil@phred:~>

socref

I wouldn’t trust xrandr, sax2 or in my case the display tool in gnome too mutch, they have all proved to be wrong, although this is in 11.3 i wouldn’t be surprised if it’s so in 11.1 too.
The ultimate test is to use the information you can get from your monitors On Screen Display, nobody knows better than the one who’s doing the final job!

Unfortunately there is nothing in the on-screen display to indicate 16:10 or 16:9 or whatever. :o(
socref

Output of xrandr is as follows:
gil@phred:~> xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 175, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 1920 x 1080
default connected 1920x1080+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1920x1080 50.0*

The output of xrandr confirms that your current display mode is 1920x1080@50Hz (ie the one with asterisk). If you do this calculation 1920/1080 * 9 = 16, which means its a 16:9 format (assuming pixel density is same vertiacally and horizontally).

Now xrandr IS reliable as far as displaying modes known to it by EDID from connected display devices. Open source drivers tend to be more complient with it.

Deano, from the output of xsandr should I then conclude that despite SaX2 showing 16:10 in the drop-down box I am actually getting the 16:9 I want?
Many thanks.
socref

Looks ok to me.

Thanks again. :slight_smile:
socref