> in KDE 4.3 folder view does have navigation
> ‘[image: http://thumbnails10.imagebam.com/3808/c1a3d838079012.gif]’
> (http://www.imagebam.com/image/c1a3d838079012)
Sweet.
Interesting post, GofBorg.
What are you trying to say or ask?
If you look well at the second image, it shows Folder View navigation.
How can you call a post interesting if you don’t know what the poster is saying?
Knurpt, it is called English. Interesting can be rhetorical.
The first picture is invalid…missing.
The second is just a picture. So what? What is the post saying? What is sweet in the pic? Draw our attention to it. It looks quite normal to me.
The title belongs in soapbox, not here.
Please explain. AFAIK questions can be rhetorical, techniques can be rhetorical (the rhetorical question is one of them), but can interesting be rhetorical?
If you would like to discuss this it should be through email, not in a forum on SuSE Applications. I don’t mind. I taught my second-year college writing class these very things last year. We could have a session, if you’d like. 
So why didn’t they add navigation to FolderView I wonder?
This Quick Access is sort of like a mini Kickoff.
from here
Dolphin Browser sucks - openSUSE Forums
is what Knurpht was responding to. Since the original Dolphin sucks thread is in chit-chat he posted a response about that particular application feature in the applications section.
Take Care,
Ian
> The first picture is invalid…missing.
> The second is just a picture. So what? What is the post saying? What is
> sweet in the pic? Draw our attention to it. It looks quite normal to me.
I don’t need pictures to understand English.
I didn’t even follow the link to the picture. I was commenting on his
comment that FolderView would have navigation. I understood the sentence so
I didn’t need pictures. Please go somewhere else and play.