Please hold back a little. The subjects you’re touching have already been discussed thousands of times in hundreds of languages. Threads like the ones you’ve started here will add nothing to those. And, personally I’m not waiting for YAFWAWS ( Yet Another Flame War About Whatever Subject ), which IMNSHO the average thread re. “vs”, “pros and cons” results in in most cases.
You should understand the comparison as you’ve framed it is flawed… comparing completely different things (ie apples and oranges).
You should start with looking up the definitions for each(Wikipedia is a good start).
Virtualbox is a fairly typical “2nd Gen” virtualization technology (ie fundamentally will perform and shares a common architecture with practically all other virtualization technologies except Xen). A major differentiator is that it installs and runs pretty much as a User application which means that by default it’s not suitable for “Server” use without modification. With other virtualization technologies, you can deploy as a Server more quickly with fewer tweaks.
Strictly speaking, QEMU today is not its own virtualization technology in the same way we speak of the major vendors… It used to be, but today has been integrated into both KVM and Xen, enabling both KVM and Xen to support full emulation in special QEMU mode. Full emulation can be considered an important capability because it means that your Guest can think it’s running on some other CPU architecture, not the same as the HostOS. Full emulation in the past came with severe performance penalties but very recently enjoys x64 CPU extensions as well, so it’s less clear how much of a performance hit happens.
If I’m not being completely clear, IMO QEMU and Virtualbox are too different in so many ways to compare, or the comparison is so starkly different that each is usable only for different purposes. Any comparison of which is better should only be asked when comparing 2 things that are similar enough that either might be considered in the same situation which isn’t what’s happening here.
I see that assumptions are being made about me not doing my research, and they are wrong. IMHO http://marciasirotamd.com/psychology-popular-culture/problem-making-assumptions explains well the problem with making assumptions. I did my research, however it was not a good one. Also it would be nice to have a sticky post that explains what is Qemu and Virtualbox in a very simple way. I know that it would be hard work, but a very appreciated one by beginners
As a “beginning to need to use Virtual Machines” user, it may help to first decide why one wishes to use a Virtual Machine.
If the “why” is, to run another operating system on a Linux platform then, the choice narrows down to “which VM product provides the best support for the wished for configuration”. For example, running the Redmond thing in a VM on a Linux platform is not easy and, the choice of “which VM product to use” is also not easy . . .
If on the other hand, the “why” is, to run Linux instances in VMs on a Linux platform, the choices are many and, there’s no “best choice” – it comes down to “which VM product is the easiest to manage from the point of view of the human beings involved”.
Please be aware that, we’re not sales people and therefore, we’re quite careful about recommending any given VM product for a given situation.
Yes, some of us regularly use VMs and, we have our personal preferences but, whether or not a particular product will fit the needs of someone else, is something which would be, probably, difficult to define.
Please be more explicit about your needs with respect to VMs and then, possibly, some hints as to a possible choice can be given.
[HR][/HR]Yes, VirtualBox is open source but, Oracle is the master and therefore . . .
Please try to understand what is going on here when you ask a question. Any question.
There is a group of openSUSE users that volunteer in their spare time, will look at your thread title. They then will decide if it might be something to open and read. This decision depends completely upon the title and the volunteers mood at that moment in time. And that process is repeated in every following step: the volunteer decides if (s)he has interest and knowledge in the thread. When not (s)he goes for another thread of for a beer or for whatever.
To begin with, many people even never look in Soapbox because they think that serious technical questions are moer of their liking. Nevertheless a few hundred people openen your thread, but then decided that they lack the knowledge or do not want to be involved in a product a vs. product b discussion.
After 24 hours one of the mods tried to explain to you that the openSUSE forums might not be the best place to have such a discussion. Others went then so far to point you to other places on the Internet. Most of the posts point clearly in the direction: you will not get an answer to your liking here and I do not want to get involved, better go elsewhere.
You refused to understand these hints and went on putting pressure on people that as volunteers do not want to be pressed at all. They want to be free to join or leave a discussion.
My conclusion, do not be amazed when the hints start to become a bit more clear. And categorizing them as incorrect behavior is likely to have more and more people here ignoring all you post.
So please take the advice you got here as the maximum you will get.
Please, take this as case closed. Whenever you have a technical problem with openSUSE, do not hesitate to ask in these forums. People will try to help you. Most of them are really happy when they can help others with the knowledge and experience they gathered in running openSUSE.
We’re all convinced of that. But we’re also experienced in seeing where discussions can go, we’re also here to guide new users, incl. reasoning them away from faulty assumptions. And one of the most valuable advices we could give is: “Try them, use what suits you best”.
Some advice: Don’t start with complex matters like virtualization. Start using one or two desktop environments, for daily routines like browsing, email, Libreoffice and get some kind of “home” feeling with it. Re. virtualization: if you lack knowledge, start with Virtualbox, qemu is a completely different beast.
Questions of this type are asked quite often in the virtualization forum but should be typically framed differently, so instead of the more general question you asked, you might have considered something like
For my first virtualization, I don’t understand which I should choose, Virtualbox or KVM/QEMU or Xen/QEMU?
I’m learning virtualization, is Virtualbox or KVM/QEMU good for beginners?
Or, something like
I’m considering virtualization to do <…>, and am considering Virtualbox or KVM/QEMU. is one better than the other?
I’m considering installing Virtualbox on my system, how should I do that?
I’m considering installing KVM/QEMU on my system, how should I do that?
I’m trying to choose between Virtualbox and KVM/QEMU, can I install both on my system and try them both out on the same system?
The above questions have all been asked over the years in the Virtualization Forum, you can search for what has been asked and answered before, and if you think the discussion was too old and might want to ask for an up to date answer, then post and state that reason for asking the question again.
You’ll notice that the question examples above aren’t general “Which is best?” because there’s a lot of subjectivity (Individual opinion) as well as factual features which can be considered. Instead, narrow your question to fit a specific purpose or use you have in mind, or a specific unanswered question you need answered.
The reference link to openSUSE documentation only covers a tiny piece of all virtualization, especially from the 30,000 foot level… Only
LXC containers (which isn’t really virtualization although we discuss as a common category)
The reference can be helpful to learning about the three specific technologies listed above but covers no ground for any of the other major virtualization Vendors (eg Virtualbox, VMware, Hyper-V, Parallels), isolation vendors(eg Docker, LXD), Enterprise Management(eg OpenStack) and minor(today) vendors which can include specific cloud PAAS(ie VPS), OpenVZ, Kubernetes, more…
In other words,
Don’t hesitate to see what is in past Virtualization Forum discussions…
And, there is almost no condemnation of misbehavior (although I’ve personally drawn a line at answering the same exact question more that 3 ways in the same forum thread).