Please reconsider the naming of the "factory" forum.

It has been named, on the web side,

Forum: Tumbleweed, Evergreen and PreRelease/Beta

This is daft, IMNSHO. Evergreen is the OLDEST available release,
currently still 11.4. Tumbleweed is the newest, not even out of the
minter, currently, 13.3 (not 13.2, no, but 13.3).

Why are you mixing both ends?

The future and the past, in the same folder?

Evergreen is the LTS, related to the standard release, even older than
the current standard release. How are you placing it in the same place
as the BETA, non-yet-released?

This is a nightmare.

Please leave support of Evergreen to the normal forum, install and
applications. Or give it a new forum, but please don’t place it together
with Beta.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 “Bottle” at Telcontar)

On Mon 17 Nov 2014 02:33:06 AM CST, Carlos E. R. wrote:

It has been named, on the web side,

Forum: Tumbleweed, Evergreen and PreRelease/Beta

This is daft, IMNSHO. Evergreen is the OLDEST available release,
currently still 11.4. Tumbleweed is the newest, not even out of the
minter, currently, 13.3 (not 13.2, no, but 13.3).

Why are you mixing both ends?

The future and the past, in the same folder?

Evergreen is the LTS, related to the standard release, even older than
the current standard release. How are you placing it in the same place
as the BETA, non-yet-released?

This is a nightmare.

Please leave support of Evergreen to the normal forum, install and
applications. Or give it a new forum, but please don’t place it together
with Beta.

Hi
Users can’t post unless they identify what they are using, all very
clear on the primary interface.


Cheers Malcolm °¿° LFCS, SUSE Knowledge Partner (Linux Counter #276890)
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 GNOME 3.10.1 Kernel 3.12.28-4-default
If you find this post helpful and are logged into the web interface,
please show your appreciation and click on the star below… Thanks!

On 2014-11-17 04:05, malcolmlewis wrote:

> Hi
> Users can’t post unless they identify what they are using, all very
> clear on the primary interface.

That’s not the issue. The issue is that you are mixing Beta and LTS in
the SAME folder or subforum, regardless of the interface, and they are
wildly different. You can not mix both.

You are creating a bureaucratic separation, instead of a functional
separation, based on areas of interest.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 “Bottle” at Telcontar)

Personally, I would vote in favour of having them as separate forums.

However, the world will not come to an end if the Forum>:)Master objects. :wink:

On Mon 17 Nov 2014 03:55:06 AM CST, Carlos E. R. wrote:

On 2014-11-17 04:05, malcolmlewis wrote:

> Hi
> Users can’t post unless they identify what they are using, all very
> clear on the primary interface.

That’s not the issue. The issue is that you are mixing Beta and LTS in
the SAME folder or subforum, regardless of the interface, and they are
wildly different. You can not mix both.

You are creating a bureaucratic separation, instead of a functional
separation, based on areas of interest.

Hi
Using the word ‘you’ I’m taking as a personal attack, I will remind
you of the forum terms and conditions. This will be the first and last
warning.

I am merely conveying what was discussed and agreed by Forum Staff
(of which I’m one) and the Forum Administrators…


Cheers Malcolm °¿° LFCS, SUSE Knowledge Partner (Linux Counter #276890)
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 GNOME 3.10.1 Kernel 3.12.28-4-default
If you find this post helpful and are logged into the web interface,
please show your appreciation and click on the star below… Thanks!

The end is nigh … :X

On 2014-11-17 05:06, Fraser Bell wrote:
>
> Personally, I would vote in favour of having them as separate forums.
>
> However, the world will not come to an end if the
> Forum>:)Master objects. :wink:

The mail lists are sorted that way as well. There is factory, for both
Factory and Tumbleweed. There is an external, dedicated, Evergreen
forum, kept by the same people that do Evergreen. There is the default
“opensuse” mail list for everything - except factory/tw. It makes sense
to separate the most modern (non-yet)release, from the established,
older releases.

Anyone trying to post about evergreen in the factory mail list is shoved
to the wolves, er… the list police :wink:

Consider:

13.3 -> Beta
TW -> Beta

12.3 -> applications, install
13.1 -> applications, install
13.2 -> applications, install
10.1 -> applications, install, and warned that it is not supported.

11.4 (EG) -> Beta - what?
13.1 (EG) -> Beta - what?

Now we are handling 13.1 in “applications, install”. In a few months
time, it goes back to be handled in the Beta forum, the oldest together
with the newest?

Sorry, it makes no sense - except if the reason is bureaucratic, to join
the lesser traffic releases. But I doubt that TW will have little traffic.

Sigh… maybe I know nothing and have to go back to school. With the young.

WARNING: I’m not attacking any one, even less personally. Am I being
attacked? May I remind you of the openSUSE project and membership terms
and conditions? I have not attacked anybody. I can’t. I’m bound by
openSUSE membership principles, more important than forum rules. I gave
my word, in writing.

Can’t forum decisions be talked about openly and without menacing
digressing people?


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 “Bottle” at Telcontar)

I took that “you” as the collective term, not as a personal term. I don’t think there’s any intended personal attack there. There’s just an expression of disagreement with a decision.

To me, it seemed like an odd combination. But I’m not going to lose any sleep over it.

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 02:33:06 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:

> Please leave support of Evergreen to the normal forum, install and
> applications. Or give it a new forum, but please don’t place it together
> with Beta.

Thanks for your feedback. While we will have a discussion about it, it
probably isn’t going to change at this point, but I’ve initiated a
discussion with the rest of the forum staff about it.

Jim


Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

Well it took root in another place here: https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/502606-Tumbleweed-Plymouth-not-working?p=2676863#post2676863

Just thoughts:

  • Tumbleweed now has improved forum visibility to match its newly published status.
  • Evergreen has been relatively low volume wrt forum queries. It’s after all just extended standard release, and so seems to be “odd one out”.
  • Pre-release/Beta? Announcement said Factory will not be available to normal users, but what will happen to Milestone availability/testing? Package search and oBS will presumably still lead users to “unstable” repos.

??

I would think the OP doesn’t understand what each openSUSE version is, which is why he’s asking for something that can’t be fulfilled.

Factory is a catch-all for all barely tested and untested code. Although this last cycle someone used “Factory” name as part of the development process leading up to 13.2, it’s not the ordinary use of the repo itself
Evergreen is LTS
Tumbleweed is implementing a rolling release.
Anything named “milestone, beta” etc fits the common definitions of unstable versions leading up to a major release.

If the above is understood, there shouldn’t be a need for any changes… Except maybe during the next development cycle “Factory” shouldn’t be used for a development version.

IMO,
TSU

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:36:02 +0000, consused wrote:

> hendersj;2676800 Wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 02:33:06 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>
>> > Please leave support of Evergreen to the normal forum, install and
>> > applications. Or give it a new forum, but please don’t place it
>> together
>> > with Beta.
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. While we will have a discussion about it, it
>> probably isn’t going to change at this point, but I’ve initiated a
>> discussion with the rest of the forum staff about it.
> Well it took root in another place here: http://tinyurl.com/mphza5p
>
> Just thoughts:
>
> * Tumbleweed now has improved forum visibility to match its newly
> published status.
> * Evergreen has been relatively low volume wrt forum queries. It’s after
> all just extended standard release, and so seems to be “odd one out”.
> * Pre-release/Beta? Announcement said Factory will not be available to
> normal users, but what will happen to Milestone availability/testing?
> Package search and oBS will presumably still lead users to “unstable”
> repos.

Ultimately, driven by the fact that we don’t rename on the NNTP side of
things (because we can’t - we can delete and create, and we lose history
if we do that).

We’ve had our discussion amongst the staff; the naming does make sense in
general if you read it not as “these are beta releases” but rather “these
are classifications of openSUSE distributions that have special support
needs”.

The subtitle on the forum makes it somewhat clearer, though it could be
argued (correctly, IMHO) that Factory isn’t a ‘derivative’, but in many
ways is the “upstream” release.

Still, it may not be perfect, but it is what it is - and the tagging that
we’ve enabled in that forum means that users posting in the forum should
be indicating what release they’re using. We thought we’d try tagging
there to see if that made it a little easier to keep track of who was
posting relating to which of these (Factory, Tumbleweed, Evergreen, or
Pre-Release/Beta). There’s not really enough traffic for any of these
individual versions/distributions, so grouping them together makes some
sense in that regard.

I’m also going to say something here that applies generally (so is not
directed at any individual):

Let me also be clear - staff here doesn’t mind suggestions or ideas, but
presentation is important. Characterizing the current implementation as
“daft” or using other inflammatory language is going to probably not draw
a positive response. If anyone wants their suggestions to be taken
seriously, consider your tone and word choice.

Also, I would suggest re-reading the sticky post here entitled “Why we
won’t implement your suggestion” - while Kim doesn’t talk about the
impact of restructuring the forums (and talks more about customizations/
feature implementations), remember that the forum staff here (sans Kim)
are all volunteers. We have real jobs, and we have to balance forum
usability with things like forum structure. If we took every suggestion
that came in and restructured the forums to meet the way every individual
thinks it should be done, we’d not have time to have a regular life/day
job/etc.

So at some point, we have to draw a line in the sand and say “it isn’t
perfect, but it’s good enough.” That doesn’t mean we can’t improve it,
but it does mean that we can’t (and shouldn’t) just uproot what we’ve got
because a small group of users thinks something is “daft” or “a
nightmare”. In managing forum communities, sometimes stability in forum
structure wins out over what seems more sensible in hindsight - because
the disruption of a restructuring (however minor) introduces a need for
users to relearn where they need to ask their questions.

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

That works [for me at least]. Post announcement, openSUSE now offers two releases “standard/stable” and “Tumbleweed”. The developers’ factory will definitely be upstream of both releases. Evergreen is really an additional service to the standard release, provided by openSUSE [community]. BTW, old Tumbleweed was also a service rather than a product release.

The wording of the subtitle is loose enough as a cover-all. If you could drop the “/Beta” from the title, it’s covered by “Pre-release” anyway, wouldn’t that be more appropriate to your comment above? :wink:

… and I can certainly understand that, completely.:slight_smile:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:46:07 +0000, consused wrote:

> The wording of the subtitle is loose enough as a cover-all. If you could
> drop the “/Beta” from the title, it’s covered by “Pre-release”
> anyway, wouldn’t that be more appropriate? :wink:

That might be a possibility, though I do see a distinction there myself,
but it’s not a huge distinction.

Jim


Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On 2014-11-17 19:36, tsu2 wrote:
>
> ??
>
> I would think the OP doesn’t understand what each openSUSE version is,
> which is why he’s asking for something that can’t be fulfilled.

I think I understand very well what each version is.

> Factory is a catch-all for all barely tested and untested code. Although
> this last cycle someone used “Factory” name as part of the development
> process leading up to 13.2, it’s not the ordinary use of the repo itself

Yes.

> Evergreen is LTS

Yes.

> Tumbleweed is implementing a rolling release.

Yes.

> Anything named “milestone, beta” etc fits the common definitions of
> unstable versions leading up to a major release.

Yes.

> If the above is understood, there shouldn’t be a need for any changes…
> Except maybe during the next development cycle “Factory” shouldn’t be
> used for a development version.

There is no misunderstanding on my part on what each version is.

What I can not understand at all is the grouping, here in the forums, of
Evergreen with Factory and Tumbleweed, in the same support group,
directory, folder, or however you call it (you as plural, not personal).
English is not my first language, please remember.

My point is that Evergreen is very similar to the standard or stable
current releases, and very different from factory and tumbleweed.

We may have, for instance, a user with 12.2 posting in Applications, and
another using the even older 11.4 having to post in “beta” - sorry, I
can not see the actual current name where I sit - because it is an
Evergreen version.

I will now answer Jim’s post.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 “Bottle” at Telcontar)

On 2014-11-17 22:59, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:36:02 +0000, consused wrote:

>> Just thoughts:
>>
>> * Tumbleweed now has improved forum visibility to match its newly
>> published status.

It already had its own forum here. What happens to it? :-?

>> * Evergreen has been relatively low volume wrt forum queries. It’s after
>> all just extended standard release, and so seems to be “odd one out”.

It can be handled just as easily inside the rest of the groups, as till
now. Like I just said on another post:

«We may have, for instance, a user with 12.2 posting in Applications (it
is a no longer supported release, too old), and another using the even
older 11.4 having to post in “beta” - sorry, I can not see the actual
current name where I sit - because it is an Evergreen version.»

> Ultimately, driven by the fact that we don’t rename on the NNTP side of
> things (because we can’t - we can delete and create, and we lose history
> if we do that).

Well, it is work, but you can freeze a group and create a new one. :-?

And perhaps, this is a guess, you can do the equivalent of “symlink”. It
is similar to what happens with the susestudio group, that has two
places, suse and opensuse.

Sorry, I have to clarify again: my use of “you” is plural, not singular.
This is very confusing for Spanish people like me, because we have and
use “thou” and “you” with very distinct meaning. I don’t know how to use
“you” in English and convey that exact distinction, and I’m not aware
when other people are interpreting what I say very differently than what
I intended.

> We’ve had our discussion amongst the staff; the naming does make sense in
> general if you read it not as “these are beta releases” but rather “these
> are classifications of openSUSE distributions that have special support
> needs”.

However, Evergreen is way more similar to the standard, stable, release,
than to Tumbleweed. One is the older of the loop, the other is the
newest. It could very well stay where it was, IMO.

> The subtitle on the forum makes it somewhat clearer, though it could be
> argued (correctly, IMHO) that Factory isn’t a ‘derivative’, but in many
> ways is the “upstream” release.
>
> Still, it may not be perfect, but it is what it is - and the tagging that
> we’ve enabled in that forum means that users posting in the forum should
> be indicating what release they’re using. We thought we’d try tagging
> there to see if that made it a little easier to keep track of who was
> posting relating to which of these (Factory, Tumbleweed, Evergreen, or
> Pre-Release/Beta). There’s not really enough traffic for any of these
> individual versions/distributions, so grouping them together makes some
> sense in that regard.

Ok, accepted. I can not agree, but I accept it.

Please then add a post somewhere that nntp users can easily read where
there is a list of the nntp names and the corresponding web side names,
and what are the appropriate questions on each, and links to each group.

We need instructions.

Also please explain how are nntp users to add those “tags”, so that the
web side users understand them, too. And the other way round.

Nntp users are few, but active; we can write faster and we have a large
knowledge pool, being typically older :wink: Please do not forget us, even
if we are second class citizens, as we are reminded now and then.

(and again, this “you” does not mean “thou” :wink: )

> I’m also going to say something here that applies generally (so is not
> directed at any individual):
>
> Let me also be clear - staff here doesn’t mind suggestions or ideas, but
> presentation is important. Characterizing the current implementation as
> “daft” or using other inflammatory language is going to probably not draw
> a positive response. If anyone wants their suggestions to be taken
> seriously, consider your tone and word choice.

Apologies then.

I’m Spanish, we heat up easily. We shout at each other, then we go to
the bar to drink beer happily. It is a cultural behaviour.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 “Bottle” at Telcontar)

On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:43:08 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:

> On 2014-11-17 22:59, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:36:02 +0000, consused wrote:
>
>
>>> Just thoughts:
>>>
>>> * Tumbleweed now has improved forum visibility to match its newly
>>> published status.
>
> It already had its own forum here. What happens to it? :-?

The NNTP side? That stays, but I suppose it might make sense to make it
read-only.

>>> * Evergreen has been relatively low volume wrt forum queries. It’s
>>> after all just extended standard release, and so seems to be “odd one
>>> out”.
>
> It can be handled just as easily inside the rest of the groups, as till
> now. Like I just said on another post:

I’ve made a note of your thoughts here.

> «We may have, for instance, a user with 12.2 posting in Applications (it
> is a no longer supported release, too old), and another using the even
> older 11.4 having to post in “beta” - sorry, I can not see the actual
> current name where I sit - because it is an Evergreen version.»
>
>
>> Ultimately, driven by the fact that we don’t rename on the NNTP side of
>> things (because we can’t - we can delete and create, and we lose
>> history if we do that).
>
> Well, it is work, but you can freeze a group and create a new one. :-?

That’s fairly disruptive to do - it stops threads that are in progress,
and while if, for example, a thread is started in one place and continues
in another, then we’ll get complaints from some NNTP users that there’s
no continuity. We have historical precedent for that.

> And perhaps, this is a guess, you can do the equivalent of “symlink”. It
> is similar to what happens with the susestudio group, that has two
> places, suse and opensuse.

As I recall, that’s because the forums are hosted on two different
servers (on the web side).

> Sorry, I have to clarify again: my use of “you” is plural, not singular.
> This is very confusing for Spanish people like me, because we have and
> use “thou” and “you” with very distinct meaning. I don’t know how to use
> “you” in English and convey that exact distinction, and I’m not aware
> when other people are interpreting what I say very differently than what
> I intended.

I understand your meaning perfectly here.

>> We’ve had our discussion amongst the staff; the naming does make sense
>> in general if you read it not as “these are beta releases” but rather
>> “these are classifications of openSUSE distributions that have special
>> support needs”.
>
> However, Evergreen is way more similar to the standard, stable, release,
> than to Tumbleweed. One is the older of the loop, the other is the
> newest. It could very well stay where it was, IMO.

It could, but it’s not an “official” part of the project - it’s a
community-maintained project.

The purpose of this grouping is to separate the mainstream “13.x” (or
whatever releases) from the “special” releases, development releases, etc.

>> The subtitle on the forum makes it somewhat clearer, though it could be
>> argued (correctly, IMHO) that Factory isn’t a ‘derivative’, but in many
>> ways is the “upstream” release.
>>
>> Still, it may not be perfect, but it is what it is - and the tagging
>> that we’ve enabled in that forum means that users posting in the forum
>> should be indicating what release they’re using. We thought we’d try
>> tagging there to see if that made it a little easier to keep track of
>> who was posting relating to which of these (Factory, Tumbleweed,
>> Evergreen, or Pre-Release/Beta). There’s not really enough traffic for
>> any of these individual versions/distributions, so grouping them
>> together makes some sense in that regard.
>
> Ok, accepted. I can not agree, but I accept it.
>
> Please then add a post somewhere that nntp users can easily read where
> there is a list of the nntp names and the corresponding web side names,
> and what are the appropriate questions on each, and links to each group.
>
> We need instructions.
>
> Also please explain how are nntp users to add those “tags”, so that the
> web side users understand them, too. And the other way round.

Here’s how you add a tag from the NNTP side: Include the information
about your release in your post or in the subject line. NNTP users tend
to be a lot more saavy about stuff, and there aren’t “training wheels” as
there are on the web interface to remind people to include pertinent
information.

This is one of those things that doesn’t translate from the web to the
NNTP side.

> Nntp users are few, but active; we can write faster and we have a large
> knowledge pool, being typically older :wink: Please do not forget us, even
> if we are second class citizens, as we are reminded now and then.
>
> (and again, this “you” does not mean “thou” :wink: )

You forget that I almost exclusively use NNTP myself.

>> I’m also going to say something here that applies generally (so is not
>> directed at any individual):
>>
>> Let me also be clear - staff here doesn’t mind suggestions or ideas,
>> but presentation is important. Characterizing the current
>> implementation as “daft” or using other inflammatory language is going
>> to probably not draw a positive response. If anyone wants their
>> suggestions to be taken seriously, consider your tone and word choice.
>
> Apologies then.
>
> I’m Spanish, we heat up easily. We shout at each other, then we go to
> the bar to drink beer happily. It is a cultural behaviour.

I’ve worked jobs where I’ve had that relationship with others and with
even my management, so it’s not a Spanish thing exclusively.

But remember that in those situations, we have nonverbal cues to work
from, and it’s a more immersive situation. You have a heated argument
with someone in the hallway/office/whatever, but you see them around, and
you talk with them about things other than work.

Here, in a written medium, we don’t have those nonverbal cues, so clarity
is important. Coming across as pissed off all the time is going to get
you ignored - trust me on that. The forums also aren’t immersive in the
same way, and you don’t have that continuity of seeing the person
throughout the day, chatting around the water cooler, etc.

So when every post is an angry-sounding post, and there’s no “hey, let’s
go down to the pub and grab a beer after work” that takes place, then all
you’re projecting is ‘pissed off all the time’.

It’s a very different social situation, and as such, needs to be
approached differently.

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C