This is pretty basic stuff, so all I can think of is phoronix is just looking for wrong names, wrong locations.
Anybody using this benchmark recently and notice anything like this? What does phoronix do that flags “missing” dependencies that yast says are fully installed?
I’m running 15.4 and upGrade is planned in a few days. It is fully current and in fact I’m upDating several packages as I type this.
Ideas?
Thanks for thoughts.
===
An outdated version of the Phoronix Test Suite is installed.
The version in use is 10.4.0 (10400), but the latest is pts-core 10840.
Visit https://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ to update this software.
===
The following dependencies are needed and will be installed:
[some of these may in fact not be installed, but several are - eg. I just ran a “make” an hour ago]
All of those, except “benchmakr-devel” are installed here. At one time, I use the “Patterns” view and selected “Base Development” and that should pull in most of these.
I’m unclear as to whether that answers your question.
When I install in a VM, I usually do not install “Base Development”. But my VM systems run without problems.
But the posted output seems clear. I guess you installed Phoronix from the openSUSE repo. The given hint says that if you install directly from upstream, the mentioned packages will be needed. It does not say that they are missing. It is just a list a needed deps, but the output does not say if they are already installed…
Ah. That helps. I did not realize that any missing deps would cause a list of all deps. I don’t like letting a new-to-me app install stuff, but especially if it looks like it doesn’t know what’s what - what’s already available - and is about to install over apps already in my system. Kinda scary, that, so not happening.
Thanks for the prompt response. I have a small benchmark test running as I type. I looked at base-dev pattern and I did need “autoconf” and “flex”; the rest were already installed as expected.