Hi, i am not sure why and how but if read some news and click it in the
lister windows, the lister autozooms and fills the screen.
Of course i could do tap-wise usage, but i like to have it all on one
screen.
Is this a bug or something you can define somewhere?
I am using Pan 0.135 on KDE 4.7.2 (x64) on 12.1
I hope somebody knows what i am talking about. Its hard to explain.
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:18:18 +0000, joergjaeger wrote:
> Hi, i am not sure why and how but if read some news and click it in the
> lister windows, the lister autozooms and fills the screen.
> Of course i could do tap-wise usage, but i like to have it all on one
> screen.
> Is this a bug or something you can define somewhere?
>
> I am using Pan 0.135 on KDE 4.7.2 (x64) on 12.1
>
> I hope somebody knows what i am talking about. Its hard to explain.
This is a known bug - Pan depends on GNOME/GTK, and there’s an issue that
causes that resizing to happen.
There’s an open bug on it, don’t have the number handy offhand, but it’s
in bugzilla.novell.com.
Am Mon, 26 Dec 2011 03:10:46 +0000 schrieb Jim Henderson:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:18:18 +0000, joergjaeger wrote:
>
>> Hi, i am not sure why and how but if read some news and click it in the
>> lister windows, the lister autozooms and fills the screen.
>> Of course i could do tap-wise usage, but i like to have it all on one
>> screen.
>> Is this a bug or something you can define somewhere?
>>
>> I am using Pan 0.135 on KDE 4.7.2 (x64) on 12.1
>>
>> I hope somebody knows what i am talking about. Its hard to explain.
>
> This is a known bug - Pan depends on GNOME/GTK, and there’s an issue
> that causes that resizing to happen.
>
> There’s an open bug on it, don’t have the number handy offhand, but it’s
> in bugzilla.novell.com.
>
> Jim
Ah, ok. Then i don’t need to do anything and most important, its a bug. I
thought it was me.
I will browse through it.
> Am Mon, 26 Dec 2011 03:10:46 +0000 schrieb Jim Henderson:
>
>> There’s an open bug on it, don’t have the number handy offhand, but it’s
>> in bugzilla.novell.com.
>>
>> Jim
Bug number 728311
>
> Ah, ok. Then i don’t need to do anything and most important, its a bug. I
> thought it was me.
> I will browse through it.
>
> Thanks for the info.
The bug is for RC2. There is no Milestone to fix so I don’t think it will be
fixed.
On 26/12/11 14:43, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2011-12-26 10:06, graham wrote:
>> The bug is for RC2. There is no Milestone to fix so I don’t think it will be
>> fixed.
>
> Then update it.
>
What, and get told off for adding an unnecessary update? Mind you, it
was in a Mozilla and not openSUSE bug report where I saw someone torn
off a strip for just reporting that a bug was still there in a later
version. Apparently, he shouldn’t have added a comment unless he’d
anything new to add.
Anyway, as original reporter of this bug, I’ve taken the risk on myself
and updated it.
–
Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks.
openSUSE 12.1 (64-bit); KDE 4.7.4; AMD Phenom II X2 550 Processor;
Video: nVidia GeForce 210 (using nouveau driver);
Sound: ATI SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA); Wireless: BCM4306
On 2011-12-26 16:59, Graham P Davis wrote:
> On 26/12/11 14:43, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> Then update it.
>>
>
> What, and get told off for adding an unnecessary update? Mind you, it was
> in a Mozilla and not openSUSE bug report where I saw someone torn off a
> strip for just reporting that a bug was still there in a later version.
> Apparently, he shouldn’t have added a comment unless he’d anything new to add.
>
> Anyway, as original reporter of this bug, I’ve taken the risk on myself and
> updated it.
In openSUSE that does not happen. A bug can be reported for one version,
then somebody else comes around and says that he sees the problem in a
newer version and updates the version tag accordingly. No problem. The
newer version recorded, more chances of a solution.
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” at Telcontar)
> joergjaeger wrote:
>
>> Am Mon, 26 Dec 2011 03:10:46 +0000 schrieb Jim Henderson:
>>
>>
>>> There’s an open bug on it, don’t have the number handy offhand, but
>>> it’s in bugzilla.novell.com.
>>>
>>> Jim
>
> Bug number 728311
>>
>> Ah, ok. Then i don’t need to do anything and most important, its a bug.
>> I thought it was me.
>> I will browse through it.
>>
>> Thanks for the info.
>
> The bug is for RC2. There is no Milestone to fix so I don’t think it
> will be fixed.
It probably will be, but it’s also probably an upstream bug.