openSUSE users to check a web page's usability

i’m asking anyone who will check and report (but especially those with
32 bit 11.4 with KDE4.6.0 on 64 bit capable hardware)

this page http://preview.tinyurl.com/d45bsfz
takes orders for a music event in Denmark (but you do need to understand
the lingo to help)…

near the top, on the right is a gray box with white font “Billet 1” and
a white plus “+” sign in a green box to its right.

when the page opens there are zero (0) tickets on order [as shown below
the “+”], and that zero should increase to 1, 2, 3 etc as you click on
the plus “+” sign…

i was successful in ordering using Firefox 12.0 but unsuccessful with
all of these as the 0 never changed:

Firefox 13.0
Chromium 17.0.945.0 (Developer Build 0 Linux)
Chrome 15.0.874.121
Chrome Beta 20.0.1132.34-141824
Chrome Unstable 21.0.1180.0-142910
Konqueror 4.6.00 “release 6”

can anyone get any of those to work (on any supported version of
openSUSE and any browser)? please report success or failure…

note: i have had several email’s back and forth with the site developer
and so far he is interested in trying to solve the problem…

[any html/javascript guru wanna look at the code, go ahead…]


dd

dd@home.dk wrote:
> i’m asking anyone who will check and report (but especially those with
> 32 bit 11.4 with KDE4.6.0 on 64 bit capable hardware)
>
> this page http://preview.tinyurl.com/d45bsfz
> takes orders for a music event in Denmark (but you do need to understand
> the lingo to help)…

"The page you were looking for doesn’t exist.

You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved."

On 2012-06-21 16:26, Dave Howorth wrote:
> dd@home.dk wrote:
>> i’m asking anyone who will check and report (but especially those with
>> 32 bit 11.4 with KDE4.6.0 on 64 bit capable hardware)
>>
>> this page http://preview.tinyurl.com/d45bsfz
>> takes orders for a music event in Denmark (but you do need to understand
>> the lingo to help)…
>
>
> “The page you were looking for doesn’t exist.
>
> You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved.”

I got there fine.

I clicked and got a preview page (a preview that did not work); clicking
again in “Proceed to this site” I get the real page. The + symbol doesn’t
work (FF 13.0, 64 bits, oS 11.4).


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” at Telcontar)

Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2012-06-21 16:26, Dave Howorth wrote:
>> dd@home.dk wrote:
>>> i’m asking anyone who will check and report (but especially those with
>>> 32 bit 11.4 with KDE4.6.0 on 64 bit capable hardware)
>>>
>>> this page http://preview.tinyurl.com/d45bsfz
>>> takes orders for a music event in Denmark (but you do need to understand
>>> the lingo to help)…
>>
>> “The page you were looking for doesn’t exist.
>>
>> You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved.”
>
> I got there fine.
>
> I clicked and got a preview page (a preview that did not work); clicking
> again in “Proceed to this site” I get the real page. The + symbol doesn’t
> work (FF 13.0, 64 bits, oS 11.4).

It didn’t work for me. The preview page has a URL with ‘url’ at the end
of it. If you remove the ‘url’, then it works.

The + doesn’t work for me either. firebug says the code that is executed is

32 increase: function() {
33 if(parseInt(this.field.val()) < parseInt(this.max_per_order)) {
34
$(this.el).find(".quantity").html(parseInt($(this.el).find(".quantity").html())+1);
35 this.set();
36 }
37 },

But it also says max_per_order is 0. So that is where I would start looking.

But I increasingly find that bits of the web are broken. Too many
programmers are too ambitious with functionality and not ambitious
enough with reliability and portability.

On 2012-06-21 16:51, Dave Howorth wrote:
> It didn’t work for me. The preview page has a URL with ‘url’ at the end
> of it. If you remove the ‘url’, then it works.

You are using thunderbird 1.5… that might be the problem.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” at Telcontar)

On 06/21/2012 04:51 PM, Dave Howorth wrote:
>
> But I increasingly find that bits of the web are broken. Too many
> programmers are too ambitious with functionality and not ambitious
> enough with reliability and portability.

i’m not sure, but i think in this case it is not so much that the site’s
maker is not paying attention, but rather that the tools being used are
designed to work great with the products of one maker, and none other…


dd

Well, it works with FF13.1 and IE9 on windows 7 (x64). Which isn’t what you asked for, but good to know anyway.
I’ll have a go on the suse laptop as well.

Works on ff13 on OS12.1 too

On 06/28/2012 07:36 PM, Nikos78 wrote:
>
> Works on ff13 on OS12.1 too

wow, yes it does work on FF13 now (but didn’t earlier)…

but still not on Chrome Unstable 21.0
(didn’t just not try the others which had failed earlier)


dd