there was no backup, yet. system ran for only two hours.
This is what I did:
On dell t5500 workstation with two clean disks running raid (mirror).
Inte RAID status Normal.
Installed Xfce OpenSuse. MDRaid turned on.
Installed fine ran.
Changed settings fonts, etc
With Add/remove dialog gui.
Removed LibreOffice, others
Added Wine (333MB), Mysql, SQLyog, UnixODBC, scipy, others
Added two dir to /
Added files two dir in / (230MB, 330MB)
Worked with files for 30 minutes…
Turned off and on…
Intel Raid says needs verify…
System wont start…
In some kind of lookup loop.
FAILsafe wont load same lookup loop.
Inserted Install disk.
App says that there is no installed system,
cant read disks.
I am really annoyed with this stupid forum software. That’s the third time this afternoon my session has dropped in the middle of trying to post. And it is configured to be for entertainment rather than technical forums. And it does not produce W3C compliant pages and is anti-accessibility good practice with its SEO obfuscation plug-n. GRRRR!
On 01/03/2012 08:04 PM, eng-int wrote:
> If threading is switched on it seems unable to sort by most recent post,
> only by time of the first post in the thread.
i’ve used knode and several other nntp clients over the years…for the
last several i’ve used mozilla thunderbird for all of email (including
gmail and ISP), mail lists, usenet and the openSUSE forums (and novell
forums before)…
it sorts by most anything you can think of and if (for example) and old OLD thread is resurrected by someone posting to it, it will pop-up at
the top (or bottom, as you wish) of the list of threads…
it is kinda nice to have all of that stuff presented in the same format…
> It does not solve the link obfuscation, although some of that is done
> deliberately by the posters, along with references to file-sharing sites.
link obfuscation is gonna be here forever…i never understood the
purpose of being frightened by them…
just4me2 wrote:
> was suse 11.4 any better? Or all SUSE bad with RAIDS.
All [open]suse are good with RAIDs. And contrary to what DD says, RAID
is extremely useful.
> On dell t5500 workstation with two clean disks running raid (mirror).
> Inte RAID status Normal.
>
> Installed Xfce OpenSuse. MDRaid turned on.
> Installed fine ran.
Are you aware that MDRaid (i.e. using mdadm) is soft RAID and is
different to either fakeRaid or hardware RAID? So it won’t be compatible
with Intel RAID if the Intel RAID is turned on.
> System wont start…
> In some kind of lookup loop.
> FAILsafe wont load same lookup loop.
If you want help diagnosing the problem, you will need to post the exact
error messages you are seeing, not “some kind of lookup loop”! You can
use a camera to take a picture if you can’t capture the text.
Ignoring the description of the RAID installation – because it does not make sense.
The described observed behaviour seems to match the experiences reported in bugzilla (Bug #731230) for 12.1, systemd, and soft RAID. There, there is a description of escaping out of the hiatus and proceeding to boot, also that the behaviour is erratic for some and consistent for others. Once booted, the system can be configured to use either sysvinit or Frederic Crozat’s updated systemd.
I had already partially circumvented this on my test machine (oS-12.1 64bit, KDE-4.7.95, VBox-3.1.3) by using a 2GB non-raid sda1 for root, (rsynced periodically to sdb1) and separate /usr /home and /var soft RAID0 partitions. The root filesystem ,including /boot, currently occupies 309MB.