No Crimson yet? And please don't also delete this thread...

I really don’t know why you would do such a thing: I posted a few days ago inquiring about the current (lame) state of openSUSE management of the only two proprietary that matter for almost everyone, AMD and nVidia graphic drivers. Why would you delete such a thread, it’s beyond me. Was not trolling and I am pretty sure I didn’t break any forum rules.

Again. It’s been 3 weeks now since AMD released Crimson edition for Linux and we are still stuck with the old Catalyst patched to work with the 4.X kernel series. It is a horrible driver. AMD surely doesn’t update their driver a lot and this is one more reason why you have no excuse for not properly and timely set up a repository, manage and release those two drivers. Not when it’s something this big like Crimson, for any distro…

You posted in the hardware forum, which is for those seeking and providing help, not for ranting. Soapbox is for that sort of thing if you must.

Figured it’s hardware related… and the lack of a driver should be posted here. Feel free to move the thread if you must, but I think here is where it belongs. Thanks!

PS: That forum is dubbed “Community and fun”. Of course it has to do with the community, but I am sure it’s not funny :slight_smile:

It can stay here so long as it remains constructive and seeks answers to technical questions. Your last post on this topic (posted in the hardware forum) was removed because it did not fit that criteria and was not constructive in any way.

PS: That forum is dubbed “Community and fun”. Of course it has to do with the community, but I am sure it’s not funny :slight_smile:

I’m not about to argue with you here. Soapbox is for

Strong opinions about mostly anything (no political or religious content)

You can always get the driver form AMD. Maybe it does not work right with the current set up. Not sure about AMD but I know that the NVIDIA repo is controlled by NVIDIA people not openSUSE.

Hi
I still see no request for technical help, also who is this ‘You’ that your referring too?

Think very carefully before you reply! Either ask for some technical help, else it will be moved or deleted depending on your reply. Again, these are forums for TECHNICAL help.

On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:26:01 +0000, fakemoth wrote:

> I really don’t know why you would do such a thing: I posted a few days
> ago inquiring about the current (lame) state of openSUSE management of
> the only two proprietary that matter for almost everyone, AMD and nVidia
> graphic drivers. Why would you delete such a thread, it’s beyond me. Was
> not trolling and I am pretty sure I didn’t break any forum rules.
>
> Again. It’s been 3 weeks now since AMD released Crimson edition for
> Linux and we are still stuck with the old Catalyst patched to work with
> the 4.X kernel series. It is a horrible driver. AMD surely doesn’t
> update their driver a lot and this is one more reason why you have no
> excuse for not properly and timely set up a repository, manage and
> release those two drivers. Not when it’s something this big like
> Crimson, for any distro…

I was the one who deleted your post, after discussion with the rest of
the staff.

As Deano pointed out, your original post was a rant, not a request for
help, so it was not appropriate for this forum. You also insisted that
nobody answer your post - that they just do what you demanded, which
isn’t the purpose of these forums at all.

As a that “someone” provide you with a repo for this driver, it was clear
that you do not understand how open source communities and software works

  • there isn’t some “group” who just responds to user requests/demands
    that something be provided. If there’s something that you want/need, you
    find out if someone’s working on it, and if not, then you offer to
    contribute and help make it happen.

We considered moving it to the soapbox forum, but determined that there
was little value in doing so. If you want, you may certainly ask
questions about how to make this happen, but if you’re going to issue
demands, I’m afraid we’ll continue to move/remove those posts as we see
fit.

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

Please move this thread. If you think that the lack of a driver is not a “technical” issue. Though I don’t know why you should delete it again, if not for just ignoring what a user keeps writing and pad yourselves on the back for your good job. And how can you suggest that someone “demands”, “requests”, “needs just for himself” a video driver, if not just to provoke a user to answer to those enormities just to smack him good one more time?

I think I saw one or two open source communities and I have a pretty good understanding. That’s why I keep reading this old non sense: “do it yourself if you are complaining here”; maybe you - the openSUSE “you” team that is - should ask yourself why are you letting this happen? It should be someone near the core of the team, the guys managing the kernel or the internals of the OS maybe, that should manage the humongous number of video drivers (2). OK 1, if you count out the nVidia, as mentioned.

You lost me again here - this is just defensive, culpable, admins posting, an ancient open source “tradition”: help with what exactly and in what way as you keep joggling with the concept?
-how should I “request for help” for something that doesn’t exist (figure of speech as right now I am seeing an update for fglrx… so you need people to “rant” about it, to notice that there is a major driver update for weeks after all, or? figure there are mailing lists for this kind of info, but if no one is reading?)?
-do you want me to help and compile the driver, is that it? OK, stop being so elusive and hit the important points: just make a “how to” about how and what do you need, teach me and I will do it! But I doubt that you would do that :smiley: Also please do not point me to https://software.opensuse.org and just tell me to knock myself out with compiling the drivers. I am talking about an official openSUSE repo, properly maintained. Jesus, you would have like two releases per year…

This is not the proper attitude from a distro that puts the user experience first, one that is willing to install the silly flash-player for example, but not the video driver to run it, just sayin’. Because that is why most of the people choose openSUSE; else they will go Stallman-style-nuts, a pure world of freedom where nothing works on your “free” Celeron with 512MB of RAM, and a 16MB Matrox. Or whatever.

@fakemoth: Your rant should IMHO be directed towards AMD/ATI and NVIDIA for not open sourcing and properly GPL-ing their drivers. Furthermore I still don’t see ( not even implicite ) any asking for help.

Those “admins” are admins of a discussion forum. They are not admins of opensuse. If there are admins of opensuse, then they are unlikely to deal with proprietary drivers. Typically, proprietary software is packaged by volunteers.

Classic SoapBox thread (IMO), probably going nowhere, but could go there for those interested in sympathizing or disagreeing whatever (count me out on that score - Intel only here…). :slight_smile:

On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 08:56:01 +0000, fakemoth wrote:

> Please move this thread. If you think that the lack of a driver is not a
> “technical” issue. Though I don’t know why you should delete it again,
> if not for just ignoring what a user keeps writing and pad yourselves on
> the back for your good job. And how can you suggest that someone
> “demands”, “requests”, “needs just for himself” a video driver, if not
> just to provoke a user to answer to those enormities just to smack him
> good one more time?

The forum staff here does not build these packages - so complaining to
the forum staff about the package not being built is complaining to the
wrong people.

> I think I saw one or two open source communities and I have a pretty
> good understanding. That’s why I keep reading this old non sense: “do it
> yourself if you are complaining here”; maybe you - the openSUSE “you”
> team that is - should ask yourself why are you letting this happen? It
> should be someone near the core of the team, the guys managing the
> kernel or the internals of the OS maybe, that should manage the
> humongous number of video drivers (2). OK 1, if you count out the
> nVidia, as mentioned.

The openSUSE “team” is not a “you” - it’s a “we”. You had a need for
this driver, and the person who maintains the packages hadn’t had a
chance to update his build scripts. Instead of complaining, you could
contact that individual and ask how you can help. Instead, you posted a
highly aggressive post on a user-to-user support forum demanding (yes,
demanding) that someone get off their backsides and build it for you.

That is /not/ how an open source community works. If you’ve seen one or
two open source communities, you’d know that.

> You lost me again here - this is just defensive, culpable, admins
> posting, an ancient open source “tradition”: help with what exactly and
> in what way as you keep joggling with the concept?
> -how should I “request for help” for something that doesn’t exist
> (figure of speech as right now I am seeing an update for fglrx… so you
> need people to “rant” about it, to notice that there is a major driver
> update for weeks after all, or? figure there are mailing lists for this
> kind of info, but if no one is reading?)?

You ask who maintains it, and then offer to assist them if the release
speed isn’t to your liking.

> -do you want me to help and compile the driver, is that it? OK, stop
> being so elusive and hit the important points: just make a “how to”
> about how and what do you need, teach me and I will do it! But I doubt
> that you would do that :smiley: Also please do not point me to
> https://software.opensuse.org and just tell me to knock myself out with
> compiling the drivers. I am talking about an official openSUSE repo,
> properly maintained. Jesus, you would have like two releases per year…
>
> This is not the proper attitude from a distro that puts the user
> experience first, one that is willing to install the silly flash-player
> for example, but not the video driver to run it, just sayin’. Because
> that is why most of the people choose openSUSE; else they will go
> Stallman-style-nuts, a pure world of freedom where nothing works on your
> “free” Celeron with 512MB of RAM, and a 16MB Matrox. Or whatever.

You know from apparent long experience that the openSUSE project values
“open” software compared to proprietary software. Support for
proprietary software is generally something that is picked up by someone
with a specific interest in making it work. When something’s not
packaged quickly enough (or at all), it’s a question of people with
sufficient interest.

So instead of being angry and shouting at the community, step in and
offer to help. If you don’t know how you can help, ask someone.

But shouting at the community in anger is not the way to get things done

  • and shouting at non-developers is /really/ not the way to get things
    done.

As it happens, I was going to mention this morning (as I myself had a
need for the updated driver with my upgrades over the weekend to 42.1)
that the driver is now available. That you found it indicates that you
probably have some idea that this is not the place to ask about it, since
I don’t believe the update has found its way to iota.net (the repo where
these drivers end up) - but I could be wrong.

As a general rule, relax, take it easy, and ask rather than getting angry
and yelling. In your original post, your tone was “don’t answer me, just
make it available already!” - so, OK, you posted, you didn’t want an
answer, so we deleted your post because that’s not how this community
works.

For future reference, you will always get better answers if you are
polite than if you come across as an angry, demanding user. That is the
expectation here.

This thread is now CLOSED.

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

And open again - apologies for not being clear that I was closing it to move it.

Jim

Since there are no questions here I believe this might be what the OP is looking for :
https://lizards.opensuse.org/2015/12/05/amd-catalyst-15-11-for-opensuse-new-makerpm-amd-script-is-available/

Hope this helps :slight_smile:

Hi
So why didn’t you post this link immediately after the driver was released??? >:)

Because I just saw this thread and bumped into the page I linked by accident :slight_smile:

Hi
I’m just messing with you :wink: It is soapbox after all…:open_mouth:

Graphics drivers are a fairly specialised area, and the documentation from AMD is pretty bad. For the most part, if it doesn’t work, you have to figure it out yourself, usually with the help of others who are also figuring it out.

With the r9 2xx generation of cards, it took 6 months for a properly working (beta) driver to even be available from AMD, and probably another 6 months for it to make it into most distro’s repositories.