Hi there,
after I have moved to another house, I got a new router a Fritz!Box 7560. Now my NSFv4 share for my NAS doesn’t work any longer. Even worse the boot procedure is now taking 1 minute and 50 seconds longer, because it tries to open a certain device with a completely unintuitive name …
So I first deleted the corresponding nsf share entry in the Yast/NSF client, rebooted the system (still slow boot) and tried to add a new NSF entry … ‘Choose’ could find the NAS (static IP: 192.168.178.xxx), but whenever I click on ‘Select’ and ‘NSFv4 Share’ is checked, I get in the ‘exported directories’ window an ‘internal error’ instead of a shared volumes name …
So I tried the same procedure again, but leaving this time the ‘NSFv4 Share’ unchecked and I got a list of valid looking subdirectories, can select one and can finish the Add-procedure without any error message. But unfortunately these shares do not work … there is nothing at all in the subdirectory defined as ‘Mount Point’. But also no error message or warning or what so ever. Just putting everything under the carpet …
I meanwhile have solved the problem with the slow boot: In Yast/Partitioner I found an entry for the NAS with its IP number … by removing this entry I solved the problem with the slow boot. Just wondering how it was possible to create such a cryptic name for this device, so that one has no clue what could be meant.
I am now forced to use Samba to get access to the content of my NAS … but the use of a Samba drive seems to be very restricted - Amarok does not liek it and does not allow me to scan my music files on the NAS.
BTW. Both Windows 7 64 pro , the one in the Virtualbox and the stand-alone installation work in the new environment, I simply had to change to the new subnet (before 192.168.2.0/24, now 192.168.178.0/24) and it worked again.
The Fritz!Box is doing the DHCP, the DNS and is the Master for the Windows Workgroup.
The NAS is a Synology DS214 which is working since almost 2 years without a problem. The software is up to date.
Any ideas what could be wrong with the NSF client and it it had any complains, where I could find them ?
TIA, Joe