Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros Device 0042 (rev 30)
this device is not supported in tumbleweed.
This network controller has been going into some pc models from Lenovo, HP and Acer since March 2015… Is there any possibility of kernel patches, firmware updates or other being provided in Tumbleweed or Leap? since there is a claim that modern hardware should be compatible with Leap…???
in one of my machines:
PCI_168c_0042
it’s not on the list which incidentally only goes up to kernel 4.3-rc1, but the kernel’s already got 4.3-rc7
…BUT the PCI_168c_0041 is though. However, some gamers using Ubuntu got it working because some guys at Ubuntu created backports and patches
SEE Bug #1436940 “Qualcomm Atheros QCA6164 802.11ac Wireless Network...” : Bugs : linux package : Ubuntu
I found firmware for it on the Github but I understand that it only works if the kernel is patched to accept it? something like that
As far as I understand that’s exactly right, the Wi-Fi is usually loaded as a kernel module, if the kernel doesn’t know how to handle the device, the driver won’t work. I had the same problem with the 3.16 kernel and my Wireless card. I had the drivers installed on the proper destination but the kernel didn’t added the support for it until V4, so basically it was doing nothing until I upgraded my kernel to v4.2.
I’m quite new on openSUSE so correct me if I’m wrong but as far as I know right now the kernel is delivered as is, so you’d need a newer version of the kernel for it to work
EDIT: I see the kernel module is basically the same I got for my card (ath10k), what’s the recommended kernel version for your card? basically I think that’s the problem. If it’s on the RC for v4.3 kernel, you’d need either to install the unstable version or wait for the stable v4.3 kernel to be released
true, a fact but not a solution…
please see my second message in this thread with respect to those who have, unfortunately on opeSUSE I cannot take advantage of Ubuntu backports to patch the kernel. So what now?
By the way, please note, I started this post as a hopeful response to reading this on the Leap Portal:
Common questionsQ. Will openSUSE Leap work with newer computers? Yes - the first release of openSUSE Leap, openSUSE Leap 42.1, will ship with version 4.1 of the Linux Kernel which should provide very modern hardware support
My ‘modern hardware’, fabricated by a prominent market shareholders (Acer and Qualcomm), has been in the marketplace for more than 8 months now
And that has nothing to do with openSUSE, your Wlan_Device is not supported by the kernel.
true, a fact but not a solution…
please see my second message in this thread with respect to those who have, unfortunately on opeSUSE I cannot take advantage of Ubuntu backports to patch the kernel. So what now?
how do you deduct that? in Windows *.1 (where it is supported) it is identified as a Qualcomm/Atheros chip and on the Acer site it is cited as such in the specification…
So no Solution.......
:\ only for now I hope, although it looks like it could be a long wait
Buy an cheap USB-Wlan-Device..........
I’ve got one, but as you know, it is not so good at maintaining the signal and hogs one of my USB ports which I need for other devices
how do you deduct that? in Windows *.1 (where it is supported) it is identified as a Qualcomm/Atheros chip and on the Acer site it is cited as such in the specification…
You know, that it is only for interrest, what Chip is build in, not what is written on it.
I have searched for the ID in the net and the few threads I found are saying that it seems to be an Bropadcom-Chip.
I do not konw, if it is a Broadcom-Chip so I have said:
That seems to be an Broadcom Chip, and not Atheros…
This issue has been ongoing for me. Here’'s the latest on it and I succeeded in getting the WIFI adapter to work.
Recent kernel updates have made detecting the adapter possible, although ath10k is reasonably well maintained in the repos, I still had problems but found a solution that worked here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/715037/no-wifi-on-acer-aspire-e5-573-on-any-linux-platform
I did the following: