My team is developing a new program language

Hi, I will try to be as less spammy as possible, so I will not insert the project name or links.

My team is designing a visual programming language, we are currently searching for people, both technical and nontechnical, that would like to see our design propositions, and give us opinions and critics.

The project is open source so we can’t promise any monetary reward.

For applications and questions I will reply in this forum and on email: zauddelig - at - gmail - dot - com.

Thank you, Fabrizio. :wink:

Might sound interesting if you could tell us more about it. What is it your developing? Why should it interest us? How would it be a bennefit?

To simply say your developing something and want volunteers to participate, that’s not enough to go by.

On Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:46:02 +0000, zauddelig wrote:

> Hi, I will try to be as less spammy as possible, so I will not insert
> the project name or links.

It would be perfectly acceptable to mention the project name and/or link
to the project page so people can check it out.

Sounds intriguing. When you say a “visual” language, are you talking
about a rapid development environment?

Jim


Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

All these things you say as quoted above give you a Very Spammy or at least Bacon feel to your project. You may consider hiring a new spokesman as soon as possible.

All these things you say as quoted above give your project a Very Spammy or at least Bacon type feel, you may consider hiring a new spokesman as soon as possible.:open_mouth:

I would have to disagree here.

Me too. One of the things I often miss is a somehow humble approach.
To the OP: I see no problem posting the project name etc., specially since it’s open source. From my developper’s piece of mind ( if you pardon the pun :smiley: ) I’d love to see more about it.

That is what I was saying, by not just giving up the information in an honest “here it is” type approach he has made it seem less trustworthy and more spammy.

Wait what, you like the mystery approach? Ok, but even the OP likened it to spammyp

On 06/03/2013 10:06 PM, Knurpht wrote:
> I’d love to see more about it.

https://www.google.com/search?q=“My+team+is+designing+a+visual+programming+language”
turns up posts to several forums…one where someone discovered the
project page at:

http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/adjdas-a-framework-for-lazy-perfectionist


dd

The OP IMHO is holding back a bit, just to see if this is the proper place. By no means a “mystery approach”. Maybe a cultural background difference, but “mystery approach” implies a planned, chosen path. Which IMHO is not the case. Compared to the “Here’s our product, don’t dare not to like it”, to me this is refreshing.

Of course anika is right and this is spam. Look at the evidence:

  1. First (and last)-time poster.
  2. No reference to openSUSE context in post.
  3. There’s an identical post on the linuxquestions forum.
  4. And look at this line from the original post:

On 2013-06-01, zauddelig <zauddelig@no-mx.forums.opensuse.org> wrote:
> For applications and questions I will reply in this forum and on email:
> zauddelig - at - gmail - dot - com.

… and no reply. But the moderators appear to disagree with anika so I’ll shut up now.

On 06/04/2013 11:05 AM, flymail wrote:
> this is spam.

i’m sure it is…have a peek at the URL i posted yesterday…


dd

Of course. Spam masquerading as, errr <pause> spam.

On 2013-06-04 14:46, consused wrote:
>
> flymail;2562515 Wrote:
>> Of course anika is right and this is spam. Look at the evidence:…
> Of course. Spam masquerading as, errr <pause> spam.

But masking out the real email so that it can not be that easily machine
harvested doesn’t mean that he is a spammer.

Not replying to the posts on the thread he initiated, after promising he
would, now that’s different.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 12.1 x86_64 “Asparagus” at Telcontar)

“Masquerading” wasn’t used as a technical reference.

That’s no proof of spam. Nor is fundraising to get basic costs covered. It clearly states “open source” and “free”. If I want to share something on both Facebook and G+, why post different messages? But there are actually only two hits: linuxquestions.org and forums.opensuse.org

On 06/04/2013 07:56 PM, Knurpht wrote:

> Nor is fundraising to get basic costs covered.

really?
-what is that big hot pink “CONTRIBUTE NOW” button for?
-and that “101€ of 15,000€ Goal”?
-or the “Fixed Funding campaign”

anywayo, which highly interested persons here will write to the
promoter and fetch answers to any of their questions:

-tell us more about it.
-What is it your developing?
-Why should it interest us?
-How would it be a bennefit?
-When you say a “visual” language, are you talking
about a rapid development environment?
-I’d love to see more about it.

or, just ask the guy to come back here (as he said he would) and tell
more.


dd

lol!lol!

My team has just started work on a project developing a new type of spam detection system named spam-sucker. In order to cut down on spam to the project site we will not be giving out any links or direct email addresses.

The project is Open Source and Open Funded so we are asking for all interested persons to get involved in any capacity including technical and non-technical. At the moment we are especially in need of funding for the start up process.

For more information please email to my personal email: spam-sucker at spamsucker dot com or I will answer questions here via pm.

lol!lol!

On 06/01/2013 10:46 PM, zauddelig wrote:
> For applications and questions I will reply in this forum and on email:
> zauddelig - at - gmail - dot - com.

i have invited Zauddelig to return to this thread, see
http://susepaste.org/79045001


dd

If you take a look at the tone of quite some posts in this thread, would you? I’ve met this in the dutch Ubuntu forums, took the time to write a fierce reply, but can imagine people wouldn’t bother anymore.

In general: even though this is Chit-chat, there’s no reason to get cynical.