The Updates for openSuse are often a little bit later because openSUSE is using some build specials as @malcolmmacvean says in the other post of you. So wait or ask on the mailing list.
This is not the right place to talk about the build process of openSUSE.
MozillaThunderbird (=thunderbird-esr) is at 140.10.0 in Leap 16, while the actual release is 140.12.0. This is 2 months and not “a little bit” later, I would call it unmaintained.
I filed https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1259678 for a missing thunderbird update earlier, which resulted in one update. What do you expect me to do, nagging the maintainer by filing a bug report after every upstream release?
As the (unpaid) maintainers are not sitting all the day in front of the different upstream projects and waiting for updates, one can at least give them a ping via a bugreport.
And honestly, with all due respect, instead of claiming that FF/TB is unmaintained on openSUSE, you can do at least a basic research.
Use as example pkgs.org as database and inform yourself. openSUSE is one of the few distributions with the highest TB/FF ESR version compared to others. And in the list there is atm only one distribution (Slack) which ships TB 140.12
trixie (stable) (mail): Mail/News-Client mit integriertem Spam-Filter und Unterstützung für RSS/Chat
1:140.12.0esr-1~deb13u1 [security]: amd64 arm64 i386 ppc64el riscv64
And Debian (stable) is said to be staling…
(*):
I like to compare openSUSE against Debian generally due to “reasons”
Leap against Debian (stable)
it’s not about TW (as for openSUSE)…
it’s not about some other distros to be compared against (@hui showed that openSUSE is not that bad — but there are others (being up-to-date)!)
But anyway, this topic has been shown up several times… It’s probably useless to discuss it here again and again. Maybe, it could be worth to get — kindly and friendly — in touch with related maintainers. As for me, I once was in touch with some of Mozilla OBS guys. But so far, I haven’t completely understood the actual difference between maintenance of Mozilla OBS and pool Mozilla. I guess it is about something that Mozilla OBS is the dev repo for TW (only) — and Leap is derived vom SLE (on the opposite)… If Leap would get packages from there, it actually could be faster. But it seems, this is mainly just for TW — and the packages for Leap are there (in the repo), because it is possible (not because it is a real process chain for it that is actively used — building for different platforms and architectures is just enabled on: if it then build properly for each setting, fine).
As far as I can see, MozillaFirefox comes from the SLE code base and has been updated mostly a few days after upstream release. I certainly did not question your statement regarding MozillaFirefox.
MozillaThunderbird on the other hand is maintained by openSUSE and lags now five releases behind upstream.
140.10.0 → 140.10.1 → 140.10.2 → 140.11.0 → 140.11.1 → 140.12.0
I can’t remember anything similar with Leap 15.x.
If there is a better word for this than unmaintained, please let me know.
georg@heka:~> flatpak search Firefox
Name Beschreibung Anwendungskennung Version Zweig Gegenstellen
Firefox Fast, Private & Safe Web Browser org.mozilla.firefox 152.0.2 stable flathub
georg@heka:~> flatpak search Thunderbird
Name Beschreibung Anwendungskennung Version Zweig Gegenstellen
Thunderbir… Thunderbird is a free and open source email, newsfeed, chat,… …mozilla.thunderbird_esr 140.12.0esr stable flathub
Thunderbird Thunderbird is a free and open source email, newsfeed, chat,… org.mozilla.thunderbird 152.0 stable flathub
georg@heka:~>
There are up to date packages of thunderbird-esr in the OBS Mozilla project, which seems to be “semi-official”, because the maintainers are the same as of the official Mozilla factory packages.
The question is, why are they not used for Leap 16? I suspect is has to do with the transition of source management to git.
Thanks for your in depth clarification.
My installed version of Thunderbird is MozillaThunderbird-140.10.0-bp160.1.1.x86_64.
As far as I know you can tell by the extension bp160 that it’s not derived from SLE.
At least, you can see:
For Leap, Thunderbird ESR updates up to 128 have done by Wolfgang Rosenauer (also very active for Mozilla otherwise) — whereas since 140 ESR by Yoshio_Sato.
(text formatting (bold) by me)
It was just this Wolfgang Rosenauer back then and it was a very nice and pleasant experience (does work frequently and often, nice talking to). But I don’t know Yoshio_Sato (as I haven’t at all before!).
Please, feel free.
For Mozilla OBS resp. factory, so for TW, Thunderbird ESR 140.12.0 has been released by Wolfgang Rosenauer — whereas for Leap by Yoshio_Sato it is still missing (as 140.10.1, 140.10.2, 140.11.0, 140.11.1 are since that 140.10.0!).
Oh, sorry. Not payed attention to -bp… What does it actually tell?