Installed Kernel Updates, now get error when mounting USB stick. Why?

This has happened before and I’m just curious as to why and whether I can do something besides restart. Basically it’s this:

  1. I click the Updater applet and choose to install the new updates (one is a kernel security update)
  2. After update is installed, at some point I plug a device into USB
  3. I get the error: "An error occurred while accessing ‘Device_Name’, the system responded: org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume.UnknownFilesystemType: Unknown file system ‘vfat’

The device normally works and if I restart it should fix it, but my question is why is that necessary?

(See this post from some other person with same issue)
[SOLVED] mount: unknown filesystem type ‘vfat’](http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/suse-novell-60/mount-unknown-filesystem-type-vfat-877349/)

Did you reboot?
Or are you asking why you need to reboot after the kernel update

No, my question is why a kernel security update makes a USB stick unusable without rebooting first. What does one have to do with the other? The only thing that appears to be affected is USB mounting. I can still use my computer without a reboot after installing kernel updates, so why can’t I pop in a USB stick?

A kernel update replaces other things with new versions that are tied to the new kernel.

The USB mount is probably using something that is tied to the kernel, but you are still running the old kernel while it thinks you are running the new kernel.

Roughly speaking, after a kernel update your system is in a somewhat inconsistent state until you have rebooted.

hi,
I have the same problem. After the update and numerous reboots it still doesn’t allow access to my USB harddrive. MY error message reads;

“org.freedesktop.UDisks.Error.Failed: Requested filesystem type is neither well-known nor in /proc/filesystems nor in /etc/filesystems”.
What else can be done?

Thanks,
Ron

All good here

This is a known issue here in KDE.
The workaround is to add “ntfs” to /etc/filesystems. It should work fine after that.

This is at least the third thread on this problem. Seems serious enough to me that at least one of you files a bug: openSUSE:Submitting bug reports - openSUSE

Sorry I didn’t read the first poster question properly.
For me it was ntfs returning the error for first poster it was vfat.
Poster could check the filesystem config file:
Mine looks like this:

ntfs
vfat
hfs
minix
reiserfs
*
/etc/filesystems lines 1-6/6 (END) 

Once you know what to do almost every problem is easily solved. But the fact that within 24 hours at least three people came here because that “easy” solution wasn’t seen by them immediatly, shows it is not that easy. It simply shouldn’t have happened imho (but bugs do occur of course). And as soon as this is solved upstream we may spare many thousands of users searching here and elsewhere for this “easy” (but not obvious to most) solution.

And as an afterthought.

It might even be that that “easy solution” is not a solution at all, but only a by-pass.

And when it is the ultimate solution and upstream does not know, on the next installtion/update of /etc/filesystems, it will be overwritten with what upstream thinks is te correct file.

On 04/30/2011 12:36 PM, hcvv wrote:
>
> It might even be that that “easy solution” is not a solution at all,
> but only a by-pass.

we should probably put a “software switch” into openSUSE and when folks
find a bug but refuse to log it, we just turn off their openSUSE until
they do…

its like some people think that free and open source software has no
cost, and they are not willing to ‘pay’ the time it takes to log a bug…

so, maybe we could suspend their license…

how does that sound?? :wink:


CAVEAT: http://is.gd/bpoMD
[openSUSE 11.3 + KDE4.5.5 + Thunderbird3.1.8 via NNTP]
HACK Everything → http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5b4CCe9pS8&NR=1

Like so many other solutions in this world, it sounds great, but it can not be done and should not. But it should be encouraged.

On 04/30/2011 02:06 PM, hcvv wrote:
>
> Like so many other solutions in this world, it sounds great, but it can
> not be done and should not.

agree

> But it should be encouraged.

agree, and i do often…still it would be nice sometimes to have more
than carrot.

i started giving a rep point to those who log a bug after
encouragement…its kinda a two carrot approach…

maybe the other end of that spectrum is (instead of a temporary
suspension of ability to run) a ploink…and, let the blind lead the blind…


CAVEAT: http://is.gd/bpoMD
[openSUSE 11.3 + KDE4.5.5 + Thunderbird3.1.8 via NNTP]
HACK Everything → http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5b4CCe9pS8&NR=1

[QUOTE=DenverD;2332656]On 04/30/2011 12:36 PM, hcvv wrote:
>
> It might even be that that “easy solution” is not a solution at all,
> but only a by-pass.

we should probably put a “software switch” into openSUSE and when folks
find a bug but refuse to log it, we just turn off their openSUSE until
they do…

its like some people think that free and open source software has no
cost, and they are not willing to ‘pay’ the time it takes to log a bug…

so, maybe we could suspend their license…

how does that sound?? :wink:


CAVEAT: C A V E A T
[openSUSE 11.3 + KDE4.5.5 + Thunderbird3.1.8 via NNTP]
HACK Everything → https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= if you’re going to be pissed about how people use it?

And the day we start requiring people to use our software in the way we want them to, and only that way, is the day you become Apple. Yuck.available at all

On 05/01/2011 03:06 AM, 6tr6tr wrote:
>
> That sounds sompletely misguided to me. Look,

did you read the " :wink: " in my original…

do you see the wink, and understand it?


CAVEAT: http://is.gd/bpoMD
[openSUSE 11.3 + KDE4.5.5 + Thunderbird3.1.8 via NNTP]
HACK Everything → http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5b4CCe9pS8&NR=1

[QUOTE=DenverD;2333184]On 05/01/2011 03:06 AM, 6tr6tr wrote:
>
> That sounds sompletely misguided to me. Look,

did you read the " :wink: " in my original…

do you see the wink, and understand it?


CAVEAT: C A V E A T
[openSUSE 11.3 + KDE4.5.5 + Thunderbird3.1.8 via NNTP]
HACK Everything → https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=

Frankly, I also missed the text-emoticon. :open_mouth:

We have become so familiar with graphic emoticons that the text form recognition is a lost art, along with commandline/text mode chats (… woolgathering … more like dusting …)
lol!

On 06/06/2011 07:36 PM, SeanMc98 wrote:
>
> We have become so familiar with graphic emoticons that the text form
> recognition is a lost art

correct! lots of folks joining the net in the last decade have little
idea i can say, “so, blah blah blah lets fight ;-)” and it does not mean
‘lets fight’.


dd CAVEAT: http://is.gd/bpoMD
via NNTP openSUSE 11.4 [2.6.37.6-0.5] + KDE 4.6.0 + Thunderbird 3.1.10
Acer Aspire One D255, 1.66 GHz Atom, 1 GB RAM, Intel Pineview graphics

  • When your gecko is broken you have a reptile dysfunction! *

No, the problem isn’t the emoticon staying in text format, because I saw the wink, it’s that without tone of voice, that wink can be a bit ambiguous. I read it as you believing that people who “think that free and open source software has no
cost, and they are not willing to ‘pay’ the time it takes to log a bug,” are wrong/bad, but then your “solution” was an extreme and thus a joke. But while I recognized the solution as a joke, I read your judgement of such users as serious. And I strongly disagree with that judgement.

On 06/07/2011 07:36 PM, 6tr6tr wrote:
>
> I strongly disagree with that judgement.

you misread my intended meaning, completely…

actually, i thought the idea of a software switch to disable an
installed openSUSE is SO Microsoft/Apple like that i didn’t think anyone
would take the idea seriously…sorry you did.

Fremmedsprog er ikke nemt!


dd CAVEAT: http://is.gd/bpoMD
via NNTP openSUSE 11.4 [2.6.37.6-0.5] + KDE 4.6.0 + Thunderbird 3.1.10
Acer Aspire One D255, 1.66 GHz Atom, 1 GB RAM, Intel Pineview graphics

  • When your gecko is broken you have a reptile dysfunction! *