i am the end of the installation and getting this error. Can some one please give me some tips and support on how to solve this ?
Error:
GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory)
Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB
lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible
completions of a device/filename. ]
grub> setup --stage2=/boot/grub/stage2 --force-lba (hd0) (hd1,4)
Modified by YaST2. Last modification on Fri Jul 16 01:16:05 CEST 2010
THIS FILE WILL BE PARTIALLY OVERWRITTEN by perl-Bootloader
Configure custom boot parameters for updated kernels in /etc/sysconfig/bootloader
default 0
timeout 8
gfxmenu (hd1,4)/boot/message
###Don’t change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: linux###
title openSUSE 11.3
root (hd1,4)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST31500341AS_9VS0JBXF-part5 resume=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST31500341AS_9VS0JBXF-part7 splash=silent quiet showopts vga=0x346
initrd /boot/initrd
###Don’t change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: windows 1###
title windows 1
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
###Don’t change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: windows 2###
title windows 2
map (hd1) (hd0)
map (hd0) (hd1)
rootnoverify (hd1,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1
###Don’t change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: windows 3###
title windows 3
map (hd2) (hd0)
map (hd0) (hd2)
rootnoverify (hd2,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1
25 : Disk read error This error is returned if there is a disk read error when trying to probe or read data from a particular disk.
I could not determine if this was a source or target disk error, but I would surely try a different openSUSE install disk and I would make sure there were no finger prints on the one I was trying to use for the installation when I got this error.
Well I do not know enough about using Grub2 to recommend it to anyone really. As for loading the original grub onto /sda, it just sounds like it does not want to load there for some reason. You could load it onto /sdb, but you would need to change your BIOS to boot from that drive and this does change the device.map file as the boot drive is always HD0. I am sorry you could not make it work, but should you wish to try again, please come back and ask for more help.
I find this kind of post really stupid. You tried to install a new version, found a small problem that you didn’t even try to workout ( that means help others with the same problem ) then blasted suse and did a little gorilla marketing for your favorite distro. You are very selfish. You just want it all for no effort on your part. You helped no one and just *****ed. In my opinion that kind of behavior is just plain scummy. It’s my opinion, and a great many others as well, that the ubuntu set of distros are the worst distros. But they are good for the brain hampered. And there are a lot of them, they all seem to come from windows and just want something for nothing.
I tried for two days to get installed, tried 2 different it installation (USB/CD), tried two diff. .iso files, got logs, posted my config, got screenshots, tried diff. ways to get the OS installed . . .
Tried to install Grub on sda, sdb, sdc . . . Nothing worked.
I tried and i could not see where the problem really was . . .
So i though it is either hardware or lies on Suse side . . .
To eliminate the hardware, i tried a diff. distro installation . . . .
So, yes, i moved on, i needed a working system, and Suse did not work for me.
And no, i did not move to Kubuntu, i just installed it, to see if it was a problem on my side or not . . .
And neither it is my favourite distro.
And yes, your post is really stupid. You also did not help no one.
On 2010-07-17 20:16, IeU wrote:
>
> Installed Kubuntu without any problems, Grub got installed on sda
> without problems, detected my Windows too, everything working . . .
>
> Not sure why Suse installer was failing to do the same
I heard that ubuntu uses grub 2. Could be that.
Grub error 25 is about the disk where you install, not the cd/dvd - IMO. I would at this point run
SMART tests on that disk, it is just possible that you do have errors on that disk.
The warning about the 128 GiB limit I have seen previously. If it happens, you need to install grub
below that. Perhaps you can use the traditional, small (100MB), ext2, /boot partition. I don’t know
if that is causing the other problem, I think not.
About sdb. It is a big disk. If the BIOS can not support it, grub can not use it, because at the
moment when grub runs there is no operating system, and it need the BIOS services (just like msdos)
to access the disk. That is also the cause of the second problem, too. I don’t know if grub 2 can
bypass that problem.
Your final success with ubuntu could be because they use grub 2 (I’m not sure) or because they use a
different setup.
In any case, use whatever works for you and be happy
Suggerence: do run SMART tests on that disk, jut to be sure. If there are errors on it, they may
still bite you unawares.
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 11.2 x86_64 “Emerald” GM (Elessar))
I have not had a partition large enough to have this problem, but I would resize SDA1 to below 128GB and boot again, then if needed reinstall GRUB as this is what the warning in the image at post #5 suggests to me
On 2010-07-28 14:36, dvhenry wrote:
>
> I have not had a partition large enough to have this problem, but I
> would resize SDA1 to below 128GB and boot again, then if needed
> reinstall GRUB as this is what the warning in the image at post #5
> suggests to me
The problem is not that a partition is larger, but that the bootloader is installed in a partition
that starts beyond the 128GB point.
The situation is not clear, because the screenshot mentions sdb, not sda. I’m not sure where /boot
is, perhaps sdb2. How big is sdb1?
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 11.2 x86_64 “Emerald” GM (Elessar))
I noticed GRUB is looking for hd1,4 which is sdb5, but does not exist, It looks like /boot is likely to be on sdb2. I think Carlos E. R. is on the right track here.
I am also getting the “The boot loader is installed on a partition that does not lie entirely below 128GB.The system might not boot.” warning. I have a dual boot setup with Windows Vista using roughly 133.72GB of the hard drive (this is from Vista’s diskmgmt.msc application). How would this problem be solved without shrinking the Vista partition?
On 2010-08-26 03:36, Jazzmaster94 wrote:
>
> I am also getting the “The boot loader is installed on a partition that
> does not lie entirely below 128GB.The system might not boot.” warning.
> I have a dual boot setup with Windows Vista using roughly 133.72GB of
> the hard drive (this is from Vista’s diskmgmt.msc application). How
> would this problem be solved without shrinking the Vista partition?
If the same exact setup worked for you with 11.2, then either revert to 11.2, or try installing the
old grub, or a newer one where they have solved this - if they have.
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 11.2 x86_64 “Emerald” GM (Elessar))
Carlos, I do not have an existing OpenSUSE install. I had Ubuntu, but that was removed with EasyBCD removing GRUB2 and diskmgmt.msc removing the Ubuntu partition. I have OpenSUSE 11.3’s install CD, but that’s it.