How much time until Tumbleweed becomes non-updatable?

Judging from some posts I have seen in here, some users who have not used their Tumbleweed systems for some time, have faced problems and either they cannot update those systems anymore or they have to reinstall the os from scratch.

How long can Tumbleweed remain unused without facing such problems and therefore be updated normally after it’s used again?

For example, I haven’t used my system since Saturday, May 2, 2026 when I performed a huge 2600-file update. Today is Sunday, May 10. I may not be able to use it for 5 or 6 more days since I’ve moved to another city and it will take some time for me to build the new infrastructure and be able to have full internet access again.

Should I be worried?

Thank you.

Hum, i’m new on opensuse, but i had the same problems as you.
I have make all updates, every days, and my system works now fine.

1 Like

In general a couple of months of not updating are fine. Years is a different thing.

4 Likes

it entirely depends on how much “non-standard” stuff you have installed from third party repos.

If you’re sticking to the OSS and Non-OSS repos, you can generally go months (and potentially, while not advised to do so, years) between dups.

If you’ve got packman, or home: repos, or a whole bunch of third-party repos enabled, all bets are off.

5 Likes

This may not be equal but, I resentfully rediscovered an old laptop of mine with Antergos installed. Antergos was an Arch based distro that used Arch repos. This laptop has been in storage for years and when I restarted it and did an update. it was large, but I now have or had (a other story) a funconal Arch install.

I generally update once per week unless there are security patches or I need to install new software, haven’t had any issues so far

On some Laptops I have update cycles of 6 month and more (as I’m not using them that often). The only issue I found was that the root partition was getting too small. It was set up in 2012, and at that time 40GB was more than sufficient. So thats a juggle, not to run out of disk space for large updates

6 months? Why do you even use a rolling release? The advantage is frequent updates.

Booting a device once per month (or whenever) doesn’t means one doesn’t want to run last versions of software when used. :slightly_smiling_face:
Plus, motivations can vary. For example, with very old hardware, as Tumbleweed/Slowroll yet support x86_64 v1 whereas Leap 16 doesn’t.

1 Like

It is installed, and later the machine got replaced by newer hardware. Why should I miss the advantages of TW?

You miss it when you do not update regularly.

There is no point - and no possibility - of upgrading if the machine is not used

I do not understand. Used for what? It doesn’t matter if it is used for it’s reason of existence by an end-user or not. The system manager (is that you?) should have in his task list to start it up and zypper dup it once a month.

Just my idea and advice. But you asked for if I understand your original question.

And when there is no usage for the system at the moment I would at least clear user data, but probably would destroy all data on disks(s) and store it as something that could be brought to live to install it with what at that time appears to be the best system.

@hcvv powered off == not used, sitting in storage etc. I’ve powered some on after six months or more and updated, not critical, mainly test systems…

My 32 bit TW installations typically don’t get booted for 3-4 months at a time. I haven’t done a fresh install on any of them since before Leap first existed. Likely most if not all were originally upgrades from 13.1 or 13.2. One 64 bit PC here wouldn’t POST last July. I didn’t tend to its problem until 2 weeks ago. I then dup’d it to 20260430 just fine, after last having been done 20250617. QA and zypper are competent and trustworthy tools. :heart: