Hi
AFAIK it will, changing stuff to systemd isn’t that hard, I’ve done a
few now for packages I maintain (and pushed upstream) without any major
issues.
At least there is a fallback for now… still time to learn about how
to modify them, else jump on IRC and chat to the devs if you get stuck.
–
Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890)
openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64) Kernel 3.1.10-1.9-desktop
up 2 days 3:52, 5 users, load average: 0.03, 0.03, 0.05
CPU Intel i5 CPU M520@2.40GHz | Intel Arrandale GPU
On 05/27/2012 03:56 PM, MountainX wrote:
…
> Does anyone care to comment on whether systemd will continue to be the
> future for OpenSuse?
Systemd has grown beyond the realm of an init replacement. So like it or not,
it is very likely going to be the future of things because it is touching things
all over the place.
I think we’re beyond the ability to choose “not to” do systemd. Good or bad…
it’s where we are being forced to go.
You can read the back and forth regarding Ubuntu’s decision to stay with
upstart. There’s a lot more behind Red Hat’s opinion as to why that’s a mistake
than meets the eye.
On 05/27/2012 04:17 PM, Chris Cox wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 03:56 PM, MountainX wrote:
> …
>> Does anyone care to comment on whether systemd will continue to be the
>> future for OpenSuse?
>
> Systemd has grown beyond the realm of an init replacement. So like it or not, it
> is very likely going to be the future of things because it is touching things
> all over the place.
>
> I think we’re beyond the ability to choose “not to” do systemd. Good or bad…
> it’s where we are being forced to go.
>
> You can read the back and forth regarding Ubuntu’s decision to stay with
> upstart. There’s a lot more behind Red Hat’s opinion as to why that’s a mistake
> than meets the eye.
>
Also, realize that nobody really thought that systemd would become what it has
become… making the argument for systemd much more palatable when it was first
being kicked around.