I am no gpg expert but I am using gpg2 and I thought it is fully compatible with gpg1 - is there any reason then to keep gpg1? I can exchange encrypted emails with a friend who is using gpg1 on Slackware without problems. I just tried to sign a textfile:
uli@linux-dfsr:~/Documents> gpg2 -sab InterfaceNames.txt
gpg: enabled debug flags: memstat
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: "Uli Fuerst (......) <uli.fuerst@......co.nz>"
2048-bit RSA key, ID 4C63D087, created 2013-07-13
random usage: poolsize=600 mixed=0 polls=0/1 added=5/88
outmix=0 getlvl1=0/0 getlvl2=0/0
secmem usage: 1408/32768 bytes in 3 blocks
uli@linux-dfsr:~/Documents> cat InterfaceNames.*
* Predictable network interface device names based on:
.
.
.
.
.
* ID_NET_NAME_PATH=enp0s29u1u2
*/-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJVhgjnAAoJEOJHW5FMY9CH7REH/AsUJSfBDZn4h8PL7/1d5GrV
V95bIaxLcI4Jhexw0uCrwmL+A+HRUTOHDJELr1yuOZcSD9nA0etISAYb/S+pmGqp
9meLxeeSmkdoPOqlLqhZEG4MpW5irnO+cLd5M8AgUpO1iRTasKFlBswluCEWt1y4
kLdDxL0zvwMyfDCcyCp1lup44AfiMI6jIbNTz2DuU112CcA9R4yZ8L+TsEnI0HF9
WI3SQMjOlThOiBoqBDP6iYQMp/P7CzFgmhZzOEujUwQZa9/SP0Rs6mlaMz2MDLEW
K7r5v5+XGnWNlUxX6KOps1a3ax1Vn7PuziBUQoO9vrPlqmQk+wav5CLo5RNzZRY=
=HO4Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
uli@linux-dfsr:~/Documents> ls InterfaceNames.*
InterfaceNames.txt InterfaceNames.txt.asc
uli@linux-dfsr:~/Documents>
After using the passphrase the signature file was created. I use KDE and there using Kmail where GPG is fully integrated. I put the encrypt and sign buttons in the toolbar and (lucky for me) so far no problems here.