As carlos says, we want of course see what the system does. And I told you to stop the ping after some time (reporting connections or not) with Ctrl-C. And then ping allways reports something. E.g. when I do
PING forums.opensuse.org (130.57.4.15) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- forums.opensuse.org ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2999ms
henk@boven:~>
ytou see the echo of the Ctrl-C and you se that there was no respons from the other side (as that does reject this type of trafic).
And when I do
henk@boven:~> ping ww.google.com
PING www3.l.google.com (74.125.79.139) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ey-in-f139.1e100.net (74.125.79.139): icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=10.1 ms
64 bytes from ey-in-f139.1e100.net (74.125.79.139): icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=9.82 ms
^C
--- www3.l.google.com ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.826/9.963/10.101/0.169 ms
henk@boven:~>
you see that Google does allow this type of traffic and that ping is echoing.
When someone asks here do do something, please do such as litteraly as possible (by copy/past of the command) and report all and everything (by copy/paste of prompt, command, output, new prompt). Thus there is no discussion about wqhat you did. We have no other way to check because we can not look over your shoulder.
Now for the next step please do
ping 74.125.79.147
But maybe I lost trace of what we are doing and what you are having. I am afraid that happened what I predicted. Talking about several problems in one long thread, I lost hold of this one. Even now reading back I have problems sorting out what everybody (including you) said about this internet connection problem. It looks as if you have two connections at the same tiome or something like that. It is also not clear how you configured (YaST, Network manager).
You forget the I am not only looking at your thread, but at different threads and that posts on them come in in a irregular time scale. Thus I have to go back to the beginning of a thread to reread anad retrace what it was about. In this thread that is a hell of a task, half of the posts talking about something different.
I personaly would like it when you started a new thread about your network problem and then of course in the Networking subforum (because your question is also out of place here and in the Networking forum there are network gurus lurking). Then we can make a fresh start. Do not forget to be factual (no stories, but computer output) and explain how you configured where and what.