These are the conflicts:
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so
from install of
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-1.22.8-1.1.x86_64 (Main Repository (OSS))
conflicts with file from package
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-codecs-1.22.5-1699.1.pm.1.x86_64 (@System)
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstresindvd.so
from install of
gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.8-2.1.x86_64 (Main Repository (OSS))
conflicts with file from package
gstreamer-plugins-bad-codecs-1.22.5-1699.1.pm.1.x86_64 (@System)
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstsiren.so
from install of
gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.8-2.1.x86_64 (Main Repository (OSS))
conflicts with file from package
gstreamer-plugins-bad-codecs-1.22.5-1699.1.pm.1.x86_64 (@System)
@lavadrop (@System) and the “pm” in the version number indicates that a) files are from Packman and b) either the Packman repo has been removed, or disabled…
But what @sfalken says is correct (if the repo is re-added or enabled…)
Thank you and yes, your second assumption is correct, this system used the radv drivers when it was running on the APU but now it also has an Intel Arc GPU and to avoid the hassle of packman conflicts I removed the repository and I thought I had changed those packages to the OSS ones.
How can I tell zypper to change all the remaining packman packages to the official ones?
Unfortunately it didn’t; same conflict, OSS repository conflicts with @System repository which I’ve read is what happens when packman packages are orphaned, correct?
There was a prompt to resolve a dependency issue about libxvidcore4 conflicting with the OSS version but with the—allow-vendor-change flag that one package and it’s 32bit version is the only vendor change. It does not register a vendor change with the gstreamer codecs bad or ugly which are causing the conflict.
In this case if it’s me I will add again the packman repository and answer the zypper file conflict one by one. You can always exit if your choices didn’t satisfy zypper dependency issue and do another try. When in doubt halt the zypper dup and wait another time and see if issues are already resolve in the next snapshot.
Thank you, I thought about removing them too but wanted to make sure I could resolve the rest of the orphaned packages. I guess I’ll just have to remove and add them as the conflicts show up in the future.
Thanks for the suggestion but no, I 'd rather not deal with packman unless absolutely necessary and since intel-media-codecs supports hardware decoding I no longer need Mesa from packman.