But when it is sdc, then the system already detected that it has one partition (though we can not tell if it covers all available space, seems however likely).
When you just bought it, there is nothing on it I assume. Are you really fond of having that exFAT file system on it? Do you need it for something? In other words, what are you going to use it for. I e.g. would most probably create an ext4 on it and most probably would not be interested in what the manufacturer had put on it because he wants to be kind to MS Windows users, not me. But again that depends on the need.
PS I am not that good in USB2 vs. USB3, but would assume that a USB3 device would run on a USB2 port, being downwards compatible.
leap422:/home/john # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x95aa95aa
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1 2048 976773167 976771120 465.8G 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sda: 111.8 GiB, 120034123776 bytes, 234441648 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x01d237d8
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 1026047 1024000 500M 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 1026048 82886655 81860608 39G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 * 82886656 234440703 151554048 72.3G f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sda5 82888704 89192447 6303744 3G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda6 89194496 152102911 62908416 30G 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 152104960 234440703 82335744 39.3G 83 Linux
The sda is my SSD dual systems of Windows 10 and then Leap 42.2. The sdb drive is for storage of stuff. No sign of sdc.
exFAT was on it when it arrived by mail order. I’m not keen on that. I am going to attach it to my router to server multimedia. But my router doesn’t recognize exFAT. My router does recognize NTFS and FAT32.
Hm,strange. You have /dev/sdc and /dev/sdc1 created, meaning that the system detected the device and that udev read the partition table and created the device files. But fdisk does not mention it???
I do not understand what the implications of that are.
Personally I would not bother about that exFAT or try to see if I can mount it somewhere. I would try to make a new file system on /dev/sdc1.
Can you make an NTFS file system on openSUSE? I try to stay as far away from non-linux as possible, thus I would not know. But for a Linux file system things like mkfs and friends should work.
Can you make an NTFS file system on openSUSE? I try to stay as far away from non-linux as possible, thus I would not know. But for a Linux file system things like mkfs and friends should work.
To me the above sounds (but I am not sure, not knowing about that exFAT stuff) that you created something on sdc, (the disk, thus overwriting the partition table) not on sdc1 (the partition with the presumed exFAT file system).
I do not know much (if anything) about MS Windows, so I am not sure it will detect an exFAT file system on a “whole disk” vs. a partition on a partitioned disk. (On Linux that is certainly possible, though seldom done).
I went back to Windows disk management tool and the verdict there is that I have a “931.51 GB RAW” file system which they say is a “Healthy primary partition”. That’s promising.
I’m going to try to install an instance of Knoppix on it (Knoppix is live Debian). I choose Knoppix because Knoppix installs on flash drives. My hope is that the installation of Knoppix will create valid partitions that work. Those partitions can then be cleaned of all files so that the drive becomes once again useable as a storage container. I do this because my attempt at creating a partition has failed (about 10 times).