efibootmgr won't print additional information

Hi all,

The actions you describe for the problems are already covered by openQA. So, I assume the bugs appear when performing this actions on a specific environment. I have added those actions on a UEFI+NET_installer and Legacy+NET_Installer environment (they will appear on the next snapshot under this job group: https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/38).
But, I assume they will not fail, so, we will still not be able to identify and resolve the issue.

The screenshot you showed are good to understand the problem but does’t help to understand and investigate the causes. We need that you provide logs so we can investigate.
In Yast team words: “yast installation logs, or it did’t happen”
:slight_smile:

Thanks, and have fun!

If you refer to autoinst.xml, control.xml, license.tar.gz, info.txt, part.info, README.BETA, driverupdate

Actually, those missing files are not needed to install. They are all extras. So, actually it is a bad debug output. It isn’t actually an error. It is still there because nobody has taken the time to report it as a bug. I you care about it, please report a yast bug with Yast logs asking for a less scaring information. Like using “Info: autoinst.xml not present”, instead of “error 37: could’t open… 404”

Just to make I understood correctly: Would submitting that file on the USB stick be fine?

erlangen:~ # ll /run/media/karl/cow/rw/var/log/YaST2/y2log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 175056 Feb 26 21:38 /run/media/karl/cow/rw/var/log/YaST2/y2log
erlangen:~ # 

To submit logs:

1: Run an install, until the point where the problem happens.

2: Use CTRL-ALT-F2 to get to a command line.

3: Run the command “save_y2logs”. It will tell you the filename where it saved the logs.

4: Mount a partition (or a USB) somewhere and save that file to what you just mounted.

5: CTRL-ALT-F7 gets you back to the GUI where you can abort the install in the usual way (power-off also works for that).

Done? action #49010: [opensuse][functional][y] Add test suite for NET install + expert partitioner on Tumbleweed - openQA Tests - openSUSE Project Management Tool

An addendum to that last reply:

The iso that you boot for installing, is designed for use as a CD or DVD. So it is assumed read-only, and logs are written to elsewhere – typically a ramdisk overlay.

If you are using a live DVD or live CD image, wrote that to a USB and installed that way: In that case, there was probably an extra partition made on the USB drive (a “hybrid” partition). And the logs are saved there should work. As far as I know, that only works with live media. A NET installer or a DVD installer does not create or use a hybrid partition as far as I know. But I don’t know how you did your install, so maybe the path you listed would work (does it have the right date?).

Many thanks for helping. Bug is confirmed: action #49010: [opensuse][functional][y] Add test suite for NET install + expert partitioner on Tumbleweed - openQA Tests - openSUSE Project Management Tool

Fixed in 20190312.

Good to see. I’ll be updating to that shortly.

Thanks.

So, that is why It took me a week of trying different ISOs to re-install TW and every time except the last 20190307 DVD ISO I got those Installation failed errors.

cavsfan@openSUSE:~> sudo efibootmgr -v
BootCurrent: 0007
Timeout: 1 seconds
BootOrder: 0007,0000,0005,0006,0004,000A,0001,0003,000D,000E,000F,0002,0008,0009,000B
Boot0000* Arch_grubCould not parse device path: Invalid argument

I added myself to that bug making 5 total people but, why does it have a line through the title?

efibootmgr -v

outputs text as you would expect now.

Very likely.

It was possible to install, in spite of the bug. But some install decisions trigger the bug and cause the install to fail. You must have hit one of those. In any case, it is fixed with the latest updates.

I added myself to that bug making 5 total people but, why does it have a line through the title?

It is marked as “FIXED” (or “RESOLVED”), and that puts a line through the title.

It was marked as FIXED soon after the fix was submitted. But it took several more days for the fix to show up. That’s fairly common on the bugzilla.

Thanks for that clarification.