I know it’s been months since the attack on Adobe that caused the data of +38 mi people to leak, but that’s not my concern.
After Adobe announced a Cyber Attack I re-installed the system and didn’t install flash since. I know they didn’t say anything about FlashPlayer, but who knows what may come since the attackers probably got the Source Code.
I now only use Flash on VBox.
They could have hided Flash from the list. I don’t think attackers would let Flash escape in one piece, specially since almost every computer has it installed.
Adobe is investigating the illegal access of source code for Adobe Acrobat, ColdFusion, ColdFusion Builder and other Adobe products
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:56:01 +0000, amarildojr wrote:
> They could have hided Flash from the list. I don’t think attackers would
> let Flash escape in one piece, specially since almost every computer has
> it installed.
I don’t see why they’d do that, but then say that Photoshop and other
code was compromised. They seem to have been pretty forthcoming about
the extent of the breach.
Has Adobe given you reason not to trust them for some reason?
On 2013-12-15 19:40, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:16:01 +0000, nrickert wrote:
>
>> I do this mostly as a reaction to the abusive overuse of flash by
>> advertisers.
>
> Yep, I do this as well. I like the phrase “on my own terms” as well -
> that’s a good way of explaining it.
Same here.
Not only to avoid intrusive commercials, but to impede them downloading
a large video that saturates my small network bandwidth.
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 12.3 x86_64 “Dartmouth” at Telcontar)
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:16:01 +0000, amarildojr wrote:
> hendersj;2608501 Wrote:
>> Has Adobe given you reason not to trust them for some reason?
>>
> Aside from the massive breach?
Which they promptly disclosed, as a responsible and trustworthy company
would do?
They certainly could have opted not to disclose that their source code
had been breached. Certainly, they needed to disclose that accounts were
compromised, but they went the extra step of saying that some of their
source code was stolen, too.
Well, you’re right. I’m being too paranoid with this. Nothing is unbreakable and at least they put out some nice info. Who know how many companies might have suffered the same and not told us nothing.
But with the tip from our member I now have flash installed wit the exception that I need to permit it to run.
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 01:56:01 +0000, amarildojr wrote:
> Well, you’re right. I’m being too paranoid with this. Nothing is
> unbreakable and at least they put out some nice info. Who know how many
> companies might have suffered the same and not told us nothing.
Exactly. And of course, we don’t know, either…
> But with the tip from our member I now have flash installed wit the
> exception that I need to permit it to run.
Which seems a prudent course if only to deal with annoying flash-based
advertising.
On 2013-12-16 06:26, amarildojr wrote:
>
> Actually I use AdBlockPlus, it blocks everything, not only flash-based
> ads You should give it try, it’s really good.
I intentionally don’t. Many of the sites I visit belong to people that
need the small income they get from small advertising banners or panels
on the side. Some of them are even openSUSE developers. It is hard and
on them and unfair to ban all commercials.
I only block intrusive commercials, like those that float on the page
and follow you, or flash.
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 12.3 x86_64 “Dartmouth” at Telcontar)
Although I have no idea how effective it is, cause I barely come across any sort of ads, there is an option in AdBlockPlus to allow non-intrusive ads. It’s not even close to being a perfect implementation, but at least it’s a start.
I do share your sentiments though. Unfortunately, overzealous use of flash, blinking, and ads playing sound on hover, have ruined a lot.