Why would such an update be released onto a repository if it could cause problems such as breaking my computers suspend function and adversely affecting the multimedia capabilities of my computer. Aren’t things like this checked and why put an update on that can break things if the existing version works fine?
The reason I switched all my computers to openSUSE was because my impression is that it is a superior distribution to Ubuntu and yet updates are released that can cause newcomers problems. Don’t get me wrong I really appreciate what you have produced with this distribution and I love using it but is there not some quality checking by the repository maintainers before you release updates such as these?
This may not be the optimal way to do this, but I forced mine to install without allowing it to remove/downgrade any packages (ignore dependencies). This temporarily broke those applications, but then I created a symlink in /usr/lib named libdirectfb-1.1.so.0 and pointed it at libdirectfb-1.2.so.0.3.0. All the apps seemed to work correctly after that.
Thanks for response. If I decide to unlock the update and install it I will follow your advice.
Still not overly happy that such updates appear which so obviously break things. There is a post earlier in this forum about this being done with the same package last year on 10.3 and it caused that user grief as well with no response to his forum post.
Microsoft are criticised openly for providing ‘updates’ which break things. This DirectFB ‘update’ doesn’t seem alot different.