Checking implementation of the function “RPC_CLIENT::get_reply” for BOINC

English Network/Internet
1

I tried to clarify some details also for the issue “BOINC Manager interface shouldn’t fully block user interaction when in communicating with client dialog”.
Vitalii Koshura requested to continue the corresponding discussion in the BOINC forum.
Unfortunately, I stumbled on difficulties to reactivate access to my account in this information system.
:thought_balloon: Thus I hope that chances will become better here to achieve further improvements also for this software.

How do you think about to take another look at the implementation of the function “RPC_CLIENT::get_reply” (according to a test result like the following)? :thinking:

Markus_Elfring@Sonne:/var/lib/boinc> strace --trace=%network /usr/local/bin/boinccmd --client_version
socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO_OLD, "\36\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 0
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(31416), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0
sendto(3, "<boinc_gui_rpc_request>\n<auth1/>"..., 59, 0, NULL, 0) = 59
recvfrom(3, 0x7ffda97ba150, 8192, 0, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Die Ressource ist zur Zeit nicht verfügbar)
recv: Resource temporarily unavailable
Authorization failure: -102
+++ exited with 1 +++
2

Just as information, this is the openSUSE forum and not the github for Boinc. In the openSUSE forum no Boinc devs are sitting or reading.

You got blocked by the devs on Boinc github for masssive spam. So now you search for attention here?

4

I doubt very much this is a technical problem about Network/Internet that can be solved by your fellow openSUSE users. To much off topic.

This will be closed.

1 Like