This is a fresh 12.1 install w/Gnome 3/64 bit on a notebook with 1 primary internal sata hd, and the partitions I want automounted is on what I assume is hd0. There are several different partitions that I want automounted that are on the same hd, and after checking fstab and going through yast and such I’m not really sure how to proceed. When I boot/restart I go to file manager and see the drive isnt mounted by right clicking, so if I just click it it tries to mount, and asks for a password, so I know it isnt automounted…
I tried enabling a couple services like autofs for example and something for gnome fallback mode but none of that got me anywhere, and I will gladly list them again as I think I need to go in and disable them for now anyways.
If I connect a usb drive before during or after boot time, it auto mounts properly, so I assume automounting is entirely possible, even though that probably doesnt relate to my problem.
fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xf6f6f6f6
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 29296639 14647296 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 * 706458375 976768064 135154845 5 Extended
/dev/sda3 37488640 604037119 283274240 83 Linux
/dev/sda4 604037120 706451455 51207168 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda5 714860433 723262364 4200966 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda6 723262428 739648664 8193118+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 739649536 739969023 159744 83 Linux
/dev/sda8 739971072 823861247 41945088 83 Linux
/dev/sda9 823863296 976766975 76451840 83 Linux
Partition table entries are not in disk order
For now the one I need most is sda3 which if ext4 if it matters:
/dev/sda3 37488640 604037119 283274240 83 Linux
If I knew right off how to pull up the uuid I’d post it here, but I have to learn that. In the mean time I was wondering if “Partition table entries are not in disk order” had any valuable meaning in terms of boot speed/disk performance and if I might be better off starting over so I can create a new layout, but that will have to wait regardless.
Hi, thanks for your response. I totally realize I can just enter the password, even from file manager as I mentioned above, but that’s the problem. I had become accustomed to ubuntu automounting everything by default, and if I don’t click the drive and enter my password FIRST in file manager or devices etc, I have to let my media player rescan 30+ thousand tracks, every single time, so I would prefer to have it auto mounted.
I’ll do as you suggested and post back with my results, and thank you, deeply, for your assistance.
Hi I wanted to say thanks again. This has already saved me a lot of trouble, and your tutorial was an excellent plus.
Your tutorial mentions partitions being created in /media sometimes, and I was wondering if I were to set a /media/sda3 for example, would this make the device appear in ‘devices’ in the file manager as it does when it isn’t auto mounted, like the other partitions do?
It’s not a big deal as I already created a bookmark so I just see it, but I was wondering what the difference is/other ways of auto mounting, for example in gnome 2/ubuntu it auto mounted automatically and the partition would appear just like any other device, if that makes sense, but it’s just a ‘looks’ thing.
/media
Is usually best reserved for automounts, Eg: USB flash drives and the like.
Typically a partition like this should not be set to be auto mounted by the installer, when you install the system. If Ubuntu does this, I’m surprised.
I know in Mint the device would be in the Places part of Nautilus, but you still need to enter a password to have access.
It’s not that Mint doesn’t require a password. It does. Same as SUSE. (It’s just you mentioned Ubuntu as not requiring)
Once you add them in fstab, it’s completely different.
Not to be a stickler but I mentioned Ubuntu, and in essence I meant Mint, as I never directly used Ubuntu, so I was only refering to Mint not requiring it, which I could very well prove. I used mint for 2 years, and decided to switch to SUSE. Sorry for that confusion.
The question isn’t weather mint CAN, it was why does it, as I know for a fact my install of mint doesn’t require me to do anything BUT it could be directly related to the following change I made,
first entering a password into the keyring, and then setting the keyring password to BLANK.
SO, could it be possible to achieve that result in suse, by setting gnome-keyring to blank, even if totally unadvised?
As this would also give the desired result, but I also wonder how the keyring is handled in suse in general.