ken yap wrote:
>
> It could simply be that there is no gain in a delta RPM when practically
> every file in the package has changed.
That can be the case but same version packages in 11.0 and 11.1 have
delta rpms and thus I am inclined to think that it is one more of those
decisions that have not been communicated to the user base.
I can see some rationale for such a decision since all these packages
are no longer included on the DVD install media and there are
alternative OSS packages that probably cover most needs. But if one
installs from a Live-CD and is on limited quota (and bandwidth) MBB
plan, it is still a huge hit just to obtain the required OSS packages
such as Ocular on a Gnome install. I was planning to give 11.2 Gnome (as
it is stable and requires much less downloads than KDE4 and I also have
a copy of the non-oss add-on cd) a try but after install I am faced with
huge amount of updates for the above packages and which will (or may) be
the case until end of life cycle for 11.2.
ken yap wrote:
>
> Why not ask where the developers are instead of speculating? They don’t
> lurk around here, if that’s what you are thinking. We are mainly users.
I am a user seeking clarification on application/software updates and
apart from users I was of the opinion that the forum admins/moderators
might be more informed than I am and provide some clarification.And
would it not be easier for forum moderators/admission (who would/should
have better communication channels open to the openSUSE decision/policy
makers) to enquire about information that needs clarification and that
they also should be informed about?
ken yap wrote:
>
> Nope, this is a user forum. Just file a ticket in Novell’s bugzilla and
> the developers will respond.
Thanks for your feedback, Ken.
Having thought about the issue deeper and seeing how same updates are
available in 11.0 and 11.1 as delta rpms, I am now 99.9% sure non-oss
repo is in the same category as packman, vlc, mozilla and contrib repos
and thus there will be no delta rpms.