Good question. Look at the currently-running “64 bit, is it really worth
it? Or should I go with the 32?” thread in the 64-bit forum for a bit of
discussion on the same, or search through the forums for the same
discussion as it has come up several times in the last year alone.
Differences: Architecture. If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know
it probably doesn’t matter which you choose. x86_64 is backward
compatible with x86_32 so nothing really lost there plus you can use more
memory and can have better large-number handling with x86_64. In a VM,
though, you probably don’t allocate huge amounts of RAM or doing lots of
processing. I’d still go 64-bit just because it’s the future (and the
present, and a large part of the past which is why I’ve been running it
for six years now on various boxes) but that’s just me.
Good luck.
On 07/15/2010 07:26 AM, asnbd wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m planning to install openSUSE 11.3 on my iMac, which is capable of
> running both 32bit or 64bit OSes.
>
> I downloaded both 32bit openSUSE and 64bit openSUSE, so which should I
> install on my iMac?
>
> BTW, what are the differences between 32bit and 64bit openSUSE(v.11.3)?
> Will my linux run faster if i install the 64bit openSUSE?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Ed
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
i know some of the intel based imacs have issues booting to x64 boot discs dispite having full 64bit capable hardware. i know this is true on the earlier aluminium imacs and win7 x64 and is down to the EFI firmware.
just something to note if your have issues booting. i believe it’s an issue down to x64, rather than a specific OS version.
I’m a newbie at Linux. So I probably will just use my openSUSE to “surf the web”, “rip and store songs from cds”, or “send and receive mail.”
Which means I probably will just use the “programs” bundled with openSUSE(v.11.3).
So is it better for me to install the 64bit on my iMac? if I don’t need to consider other program whether can run in 64bit.
I tried to run my mac os x(snow leopard) at 64 bit, but soon find out that the system cannot handle some 32bit programs. so i reinstalled the 32bit version of Snow Leopard
last question: if i only uses the software that are bundled with the opensuse, will 64 bit better for my computer 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 4GB 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM
Typically problems booting 64-bit when using 64-bit hardware is specific
to virtualization. If your processor does not have the AMD-V or Intel VT
stuff in the actual processor then you can run a 64-bit OS but you cannot
virtualize 64-bit. This is a hardware issue and affects all platforms as
a result. Check with your processor specs for details.
Good luck.
On 07/15/2010 08:26 AM, veehexx wrote:
>
> i know some of the intel based imacs have issues booting to x64 boot
> discs dispite having full 64bit capable hardware. i know this is true on
> the earlier aluminium imacs and win7 x64 and is down to the EFI
> firmware.
>
> just something to note if your have issues booting. i believe it’s an
> issue down to x64, rather than a specific OS version.
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m planning to install openSUSE 11.3 on my iMac, which is capable of
> running both 32bit or 64bit OSes.
>
> I downloaded both 32bit openSUSE and 64bit openSUSE, so which should I
> install on my iMac?
Unless you’ve got more than 4Gb of memory or specific applications that
need 64bit, I would choose 32bit.
If 64bit capable, take 64bit. No reason not to do so. The OS will make full use of your system’s architecture.
Some remark: 32bit kernel-desktop has PAE built in, and hence can handle > 3 GB.
64 bit won’t cause you any problems (that can’t easily be solved), many
of us have been using 64 bit openSUSE for a long time with minimal
issues. But there are occasionally issues, so if you aren’t going to
gain much and you aren’t too comfortable with GNU/Linux yet, I’d suggest
32 bit.
But don’t worry too much about it, and remember the openSUSE community
is always there if you need help.
>
> If 64bit capable, take 64bit. No reason not to do so.
There are at least two -
there is no 64bit flash, so on a desktop, you need to do some fiddling
to get it working with 32bit instead. 64 bit java used to be a problem
IIRC, but I have not looked at that for quite a while.
if you’re running lots of processes, you will likely hit the memory
ceiling faster with a 64bit system, because all pointers are twice the
size. I have a number of mailservers that regularly run hundreds of
postfix processes - this is far more efficient on 32bit.
The choice 32/64 bit is the usual - if it doesn’t give you a benefit,
why change?
> The OS will make full use of your system’s architecture.
> Some remark: 32bit kernel-desktop has PAE built in, and hence can
> handle > 3 GB.
Albeit slower, but probably not noticable to the casual observer.
> Knurpht wrote:
>
>>
>> If 64bit capable, take 64bit. No reason not to do so.
>
> There are at least two -
>
> - if you’re running lots of processes, you will likely hit the memory
> ceiling faster with a 64bit system, because all pointers are twice the
> size. I have a number of mailservers that regularly run hundreds of
> postfix processes - this is far more efficient on 32bit.
Example:
one of my backend mailservers is being hammered right now - it’s an AMD
3800+ with 1Gb RAM. It’s running 864 processes, mostly smtpd. With
32bit, those 800 proceses use a lot less memory so I get to run more of
them than I would have with a 64bit os.