Ok, after my adventure whit the libreoffice problem at work (that ended up on reinstalling the system), i decided it was time to pass my home computer to tumbleweed as well (specially whit all this new fuzz about the future of opensuse)
everything went well or i was able to solve it except for 2 errors
1 - Amarok says that his database returned the following errors: GREPME MySQLe query failed! (2000) on init
I even tried to reinstall but it didn’t solve the problem
2 - when i try to check for updates it returns 1 conflict! it says that:
libqca2-2.0.3-3.1.2.x86_64 requires libqt4 = 4.7.4 but that can’t be solved
Use Yast software management. And uninstall Apper. Don’t use it (yet).
The amarok error is due to the update mysql version. Downgrade mysql to the stock distro version.
In Software Management, search for mysql. The packages “libmysql*” and “mysql-community*” should be downgaded to 5.5.16 versions.
I had Apper installed but never use it (now removed). I came to suse in version 9.* and always used Yast Software management and still keep that way It’s the best tool for the job!
Anyway, i still have the
"libqca2-2.0.3-3.1.2.x86_64 requires libqt4 = 4.7.4 but that can’t be solved" error and the solution presented is to downgrade (from what i understand) the all kde to 4.7 (and the remove of a serie of software, such as Kdenlive, for example.
On 06/24/2012 10:36 AM, SpeccyMan wrote:
>
> Hi, thanks for both replies.
>
> I had Apper installed but never use it (now removed). I came to suse
> in version 9.* and always used Yast Software management and still keep
> that way It’s the best tool for the job!
>
> Anyway, i still have the
>
> "libqca2-2.0.3-3.1.2.x86_64 requires libqt4 = 4.7.4 but that can’t be
> solved" error and the solution presented is to downgrade (from what i
> understand) the all kde to 4.7 (and the remove of a serie of software,
> such as Kdenlive, for example.
>
> Any other solution for this?!
>
>
> (Amarok is solved, thanks!)
>
>
Amarok is solved, I see.
But I wonder if you use the packman amarok or the openSUSE standard
amarok, does the version of liqqca2 (and hence libqt4) change, providing
a relaxing of the conflict.
So which version of amarok are you using and details like from this:
zypper se -s -i amarok
[just a thought, not necessarily a recommendadtion]
rpm -qi libqca2
Name : libqca2
Version : 2.0.3
Release : 1.6
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Fri 22 Jun 2012 12:33:33 BST
Group : Development/Libraries/C and C++
Size : 1943072
License : LGPL-2.1+
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Fri 15 Jun 2012 00:51:16 BST, Key ID 01a7de5aa840f92c
Source RPM : libqca2-2.0.3-1.6.src.rpm
Build Date : Fri 15 Jun 2012 00:50:10 BST
Build Host : build09
Relocations : (not relocatable)
Vendor : obs://build.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Tumbleweed
URL : Delta XMPP Project
Summary : Qt Cryptographic Architecture 2
rpm -qi libqt4
Name : libqt4
Version : 4.8.2
Release : 5.4
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Sat 23 Jun 2012 04:24:30 BST
Group : System/Libraries
Size : 16025725
License : GPL-3.0 or SUSE-LGPL-2.1-with-nokia-exception-1.1
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Thu 21 Jun 2012 12:11:12 BST, Key ID 01a7de5aa840f92c
Source RPM : libqt4-4.8.2-5.4.src.rpm
Build Date : Thu 21 Jun 2012 11:48:28 BST
Build Host : build35
Relocations : (not relocatable)
Vendor : obs://build.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Tumbleweed
URL : QT software’s Store | Sofware for Research & Development
Summary : C++ Program Library, Core Components
Description :
Qt is a set of libraries for developing applications.
On 06/26/2012 08:16 AM, SpeccyMan wrote:
>
> well , what i get from your command is:
>
> S | Nome | Tipo | Versão | Arch | Repositório
> --±------------±-------±----------±-------±------------------
> i | amarok | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | x86_64 | Packman
> i | amarok | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | x86_64 | Packman Repository
> i | amarok-lang | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | noarch | Packman
> i | amarok-lang | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | noarch | Packman Repository
>
>
> So I suppose i have the Packman version… What do you suggest?
>
>
Your listing confuses me, duplicates??? Strange. So could you list your
repos please with this command: zypper lr -d
On 06/26/2012 08:16 AM, SpeccyMan wrote:
>
> well , what i get from your command is:
>
> S | Nome | Tipo | Versão | Arch | Repositório
> --±------------±-------±----------±-------±------------------
> i | amarok | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | x86_64 | Packman
> i | amarok | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | x86_64 | Packman Repository
> i | amarok-lang | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | noarch | Packman
> i | amarok-lang | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | noarch | Packman Repository
>
>
> So I suppose i have the Packman version… What do you suggest?
>
>
Furthermore, the version 2.5.0-6.2 is in the openSUSE 12.1 Packman repo.
Whereas the Amarok available to me is 2.5.0-6.3 from the different
Packman Tumbleweed repo.
So if you are using Tumbleweed with the openSUSE 12.1 Packman repo, that
is the wrong repo, and you will have a 95% chance of generating
dependency issues.
And so you should chenge to the correct repos and then try to “zypper
dup”. The way to create and maintain Tumbleweed is found on the
Tumbleweed page in the wiki and also on this link: http://tinyurl.com/875yb8o
nvidea is disabled and all the others are on, but i still have the same problem. Actually, i’ve already let only the last 4 on and the conflict still presents it self.
On 07/03/2012 09:16 AM, SpeccyMan wrote:
>
> swerdna;2471569 Wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 08:16 AM, SpeccyMan wrote:
>>>
>>> well , what i get from your command is:
>>>
>>> S | Nome | Tipo | Versão | Arch | Repositório
>>> --±------------±-------±----------±-------±------------------
>>> i | amarok | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | x86_64 | Packman
>>> i | amarok | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | x86_64 | Packman Repository
>>> i | amarok-lang | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | noarch | Packman
>>> i | amarok-lang | pacote | 2.5.0-6.2 | noarch | Packman Repository
>>>
>>>
>>> So I suppose i have the Packman version… What do you suggest?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Your listing confuses me, duplicates??? Strange. So could you list your
>> repos please with this command: zypper lr -d
>>
>> –
>> Regards
>> swerdna
>
>
>
> I’m sorry for taking so long, but i’ve not been at my computer in the
> last few days.
>
> i’ve been watching closely my repos and i now have:
>
>
> Code:
> --------------------
> # | Alcunha | Nome | Activado | Refrescar | Prioridade | Tipo | URI | Serviço
> --±------------------------±------------------------±---------±----------±-----------±-------±-------------------------------------------------------------------------------±-------
> 1 | Education | Education | Sim | Sim | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Education/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/ |
> 2 | KDE:Extra | KDE:Extra | Sim | Sim | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/KDE:/Extra/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/ |
> 3 | Packman Repository | Packman Repository | Sim | Sim | 99 | rpm-md | http://packman.inode.at/suse/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/ |
> 4 | home:carsten29:gimp2.8 | home:carsten29:gimp2.8 | Sim | Sim | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/carsten29:/gimp2.8/Tumbleweed/ |
> 5 | nVidia Graphics Drivers | nVidia Graphics Drivers | Não | Sim | 99 | rpm-md | ftp://download.nvidia.com/opensuse/12.1/ |
> 6 | openSUSE:Stable_OSS | openSUSE:Stable_OSS | Sim | Sim | 99 | yast2 | http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/openSUSE-current/repo/oss/ |
> 7 | openSUSE:Stable_Updates | openSUSE:Stable_Updates | Sim | Sim | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/update/openSUSE-current/ |
> 8 | openSUSE:Stable_non-OSS | openSUSE:Stable_non-OSS | Sim | Sim | 99 | yast2 | http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/openSUSE-current/repo/non-oss/ |
> 9 | openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Sim | Sim | 99 | rpm-md | http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Tumbleweed/standard/ |
>
> --------------------
>
>
> nvidea is disabled and all the others are on, but i still have the same
> problem. Actually, i’ve already let only the last 4 on and the conflict
> still presents it self.
>
> I’m really out of ideas
>
>
I have the same KDE version as you. I have a dirrerent libqca2:
> john@tumbleweed121:~> rpm -qa | grep libqca2
> libqca2-2.0.3-1.6.x86_64
Mine comes from repo Tumbleweed
You have libqca2-2.0.3-3.1.2.x86_64 from openSUSE Current repo
About 400 dependencies come from that, which is why the attempt to drag
you to 12.1 away from Tumbleweed.
Well, it looks like I’m already using the Open version of the driver (nouveau). Anyway, I still have that problem whit the libqca2 and i still have no clue on how to solve it. Any hint?!