1MB/s hard bandwith limit?

Hi!

I’ve been googling the world wide web and more and cannot find an answer to my problem. It seems that there is a hard 1 MB/s download limit for the whole 12.1 system I have installed. All other internett connected equipment I have can fully utulise my 60Mb/s internett line. So, do OpenSUSE have a hard wired bandwith limit? And how on earth to I get rid of it?

TIA for you time and help :slight_smile:

I routinely get 1.2MB/s - the curent limit of my ISP but one which is about to go up.

Well, my ISP is giving me 60MB/s guaranteed, usually more, on all my other devices.It is just my OpenSUSE install that is so painstakingly slow on downloads.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Definitely not. I’ve gone faster than that over wireless connections,
and go in the 80-90 MB/s range on the gigabit connection at work.

Good luck.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=oDCi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:16:02 +0000, jooiong wrote:

> So, do OpenSUSE have a hard wired bandwith limit?

No. Such a limit would be ridiculous to impose and there would be no
reason for doing it.

So help us out here - how are you determining that you’re only seeing 1
MB/s download speed - what site are you connecting to, for example?

It may well be that the limitation is at the other end of the connection

  • either a physical limitation or some bandwidth-throttling being done
    from the site you’re attempting to download (some sites do that so one
    person with a huge pipe can’t monopolize the bandwidth).

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:26:02 +0000, jooiong wrote:

> Well, my ISP is giving me 60MB/s guaranteed, usually more, on all my
> other devices.It is just my OpenSUSE install that is so painstakingly
> slow on downloads.

So again, tell us where you’re trying to download from.

You’ve lept to a conclusion as to what the problem is rather than
describing the problem in a way that people can assist you.

See http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You are describing your guesses rather than the symptoms.

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

I have been downloading from sites like:

ftp.sunet.se
ftp.uio.no
vimeo.com
vmware.com
ftp.free.fr

and so on.

My location is Norway and my ISP is Altibox. Fiber to the home with a 60/60 line.

Now, often I download simultaneously from several sites. My Fedora 16 installs, my kids Macs, iPads and Galaxy S2 phones all download at “full” speed. This also go for my PS3, Samsung SmartTV and other gadgets. It is only on my OpenSUSE box that I never ever go beyond the 1MB/s “limit”. No matter from where, when or how I download. Downloading from several different sites at the same time just slows down all downloads so the aggregated bandwidth use is 1MB/s. I can simultaneously download on my Fedora 16 laptop at the reamaining bandwidth (approx 6MB/s) from the same sites. Thus making me point my finger to OpenSUSE it self.

So, where to start trouble shooting? Do there exist anything I can have turned on by mistake that will throttle bandwith? QoS or someting?

I do not think my HW is to blame:

Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr BC:AE:C5:11:AA:85
inet addr:192.168.1.10 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::beae:c5ff:fe11:aa85/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1056026 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:648616 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1449902398 (1382.7 Mb) TX bytes:65244551 (62.2 Mb)
Interrupt:51

Sorry for being unclear in my earlier posts :slight_smile:

On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:56:02 +0000, jooiong wrote:

> So, where to start trouble shooting? Do there exist anything I can have
> turned on by mistake that will throttle bandwith? QoS or someting?

Not installed by default. What is the physical network hardware in the
system?

It might be useful to do the following:

  1. Reboot the system
  2. Attempt a download
  3. After the download has been running for a little bit, grab the output
    of: uptime && netstat -s (this gives the uptime of the system and some
    network statistical counters - the time up is important so we can look at
    the stats in the context of how long the system has been up and with a
    single file transfer attempting to be run).

It might also be useful to see if you can achieve a higher transfer rate
on your local network, say from your fedora system.

That will tell us if it’s an interaction between the system and your
router (maybe an MTU setting that needs to be tweaked, for example).

> I do not think my HW is to blame:

We’ll see. It could be a hardware-related issue. Have you tried a LiveCD
(openSUSE and/or another distro) to see if you can get a faster download
with that? If you can try that, that’ll tell us if it’s the install on
the system or something else.

Does your ISP support IPv6? If it doesn’t, you might try disabling it
(though I don’t think that would slow performance down as you describe -
it would slow down name resolution if you had to wait for a timeout for
IPv6 resolution, but once a transfer starts, the system doesn’t need to
resolve the address again).

What is the output of a similar ifconfig command on your Fedora box? (If
the MTU is having to be renegotiated constantly, that might turn up as a
difference between the two systems)

Jim


Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:09:45 +0000, Jim Henderson wrote:

> 1. Reboot the system
> 2. Attempt a download
> 3. After the download has been running for a little bit, grab the
> output of: uptime && netstat -s (this gives the uptime of the system
> and some network statistical counters - the time up is important so we
> can look at the stats in the context of how long the system has been up
> and with a single file transfer attempting to be run).

Additional note, on step 3, when you post that output, be sure to include
it in code tags so it isn’t wrapped inappropriately - otherwise it won’t
be readable.

You’ll need to be in the advanced message editor to do that.

Jim


Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

You can test your download and upload speed at this site if you wish:

Speedtest.net - The Global Broadband Speed Test

I got a 19.66 Mbps on Downloads and 0.97 Mbps on uploads using openSUSE 12.1 with Road Runner service from Time Warner Cable so see what you get.

Thank You,

On 2012-06-04 23:56, jooiong wrote:
> I do not think my HW is to blame:
>
> Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr BC:AE:C5:11:AA:85

How is your ethernet configured? Use “mii-diag”.
Are you sure your ethernet cable is rated for 100Mbps?


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” at Telcontar)

On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:58:07 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:

> How is your ethernet configured? Use “mii-diag”.
> Are you sure your ethernet cable is rated for 100Mbps?

The number of errors suggests that it’s not a cable quality problem - if
it were and it negotiated 100 Mbps without an issue, then the error
counter would be going nuts.

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On 2012-06-05 01:44, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:58:07 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
>> How is your ethernet configured? Use “mii-diag”.
>> Are you sure your ethernet cable is rated for 100Mbps?
>
> The number of errors suggests that it’s not a cable quality problem - if
> it were and it negotiated 100 Mbps without an issue, then the error
> counter would be going nuts.

It could have negotiated 10 Mbps.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” at Telcontar)

On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:23:06 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:

> On 2012-06-05 01:44, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:58:07 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>
>>> How is your ethernet configured? Use “mii-diag”.
>>> Are you sure your ethernet cable is rated for 100Mbps?
>>
>> The number of errors suggests that it’s not a cable quality problem -
>> if it were and it negotiated 100 Mbps without an issue, then the error
>> counter would be going nuts.
>
> It could have negotiated 10 Mbps.

Now there’s a thought I hadn’t considered - that would be 1.25 MB/s max
throughput, take away overhead, that would be about 1 MB/s max speed.

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On 2012-06-05 02:35, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:23:06 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:

>> It could have negotiated 10 Mbps.
>
> Now there’s a thought I hadn’t considered - that would be 1.25 MB/s max
> throughput, take away overhead, that would be about 1 MB/s max speed.

precisely… :wink:

And it happened to me on a site where they were using correct ethernet
cable, that tested ok statically, pins 1 to 1, 2 to 2,… 8 to 8. BUT! the
pairs were incorrect, 3 and 5 were not a twisted pair, they had paired 1-2,
3-4, 5-6, 7-8. Just fine for telephony, plain wrong for ethernet at 100 mbps.

You get two different results on that case: a) negotiation fails and go
down a step. b) it does not fail, for there are a lot of transmission
errors. I think it depends on the length of cable what case you get.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” at Telcontar)

Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2012-06-05 02:35, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:23:06 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
>>> It could have negotiated 10 Mbps.
>> Now there’s a thought I hadn’t considered - that would be 1.25 MB/s max
>> throughput, take away overhead, that would be about 1 MB/s max speed.
>
> precisely… :wink:

Right. So why has nobody suggested that the OP post the link speed?
jooiong please post the output (in CODE tags) of:

ethtool eth0

On 2012-06-06 12:15, Dave Howorth wrote:
> Right. So why has nobody suggested that the OP post the link speed?

I did.


Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” at Telcontar)