Thanks for posting it. I’m in the process of switching an 11.4 system to Evergreen (not tried before here), and probably going with Gnome2 for that. My impression so far is that Evergreen is really extended support rather than a conventional LTS system aimed at enterprises.
A major kernel version change might seem risky for a normal LTS commitment, but in Evergreen’s case, now is the best time to do it not only for security patching and recommended maintenance, but also for newer device support in the later kernel.
On 2012-11-12 15:26, consused wrote:
>
> Thanks for posting it. I’m in the process of switching an 11.4 system to
> Evergreen (not tried before here), and probably going with Gnome2 for
> that. My impression so far is that Evergreen is really extended support
> rather than a conventional LTS system aimed at enterprises.
>
> A major kernel version change might seem risky for a normal LTS
> commitment, but in Evergreen’s case, now is the best time to do it not
> only for security patching and recommended maintenance, but also for
> newer device support in the later kernel.
They do it, IIRC, because they tag along after the SLES maintenance
patches, and that way it is less work than if they had to backport all
patches on their own to a lower kernel.
They are very few people doing EG.
–
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 “Celadon” (Minas Tirith))
Considering that, it makes sense to avoid backporting. Also IIRC, Tumbleweed [based on 11.4] updated to version 3 kernel, and was finally ahead of the released 12.1’s kernel (at 3.1.x?). I’m sure the 3.0.x got some good testing on TW-11.4.