Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Does openSUSE (Tumbleweed) have binary blobs in its kernel?

  1. #1

    Default Does openSUSE (Tumbleweed) have binary blobs in its kernel?


    openSUSE is not listed in the List of Free GNU/Linux distributions and it explains it with the following text:

    openSUSE offers a repository of nonfree software. This is an instance of how “open” is weaker than “free”.

    This is the link of the explanation:

    Is it not considered as Free GNU/Linux only due to the nonfree software repository you can download once you have openSUSE Tumbleweed installed? Or is it because it also contains binary blobs in its kernel?

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Chicago suburbs
    Blog Entries

    Default Re: Does openSUSE (Tumbleweed) have binary blobs in its kernel?

    As far as I know, there isn't anything problematic in the kernel.

    As for why some folk consider it non-free -- you will have to ask the people who consider it non-free. Some years ago, Novel talked to Microsoft about something, and for some people that made openSUSE evil (for no reason that I can understand).

    And then openSUSE supports secure-boot, with "shim.efi" signed by Microsoft. And some people don't like that.

    For the purists, though, it might be partly due to the repos. There is some proprietary code in "packman" repo. But "packman" is not officially part of openSUSE. So maybe the issue is the "repo-non-oss" repo, which has some proprietary packages (such as "opera") that can be installed. And that repo is officially part of openSUSE releases.
    openSUSE Leap 15.3; KDE Plasma 5.18.6;

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts