View Poll Results: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    5 14.71%
  • Possibly

    4 11.76%
  • No

    19 55.88%
  • Undecided

    2 5.88%
  • Err - What's a Semantic Desktop?

    4 11.76%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    2,033

    Default Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Leaving aside any prejudices one may have from success or failure of various implementations of a Semantic Desktop, do you actually want one?

    People use computers for a very diverse range of tasks, personally, for my own work-flow I don't see any advantage.

    My own requirements are for document content indexing, a task that previously I had used Beagle for. More latterly Nepomuk, which I found moderately successful but woefully lacking in terms of complex search queries. I'll refrain from commenting on Baloo. Currently my requirements are met by a recently discovered (my myself) indexing/search utility, Recoll, which I am greatly impressed with.

    I am curious as to how others, especially those who make extensive use of tags, ratings, metadata etc. and are less concerned with actual document content, view the advantages or otherwise of Semantic Desktop capabilities.
    Regards, Paul

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago suburbs
    Posts
    15,671
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Quote Originally Posted by tannington View Post
    Leaving aside any prejudices one may have from success or failure of various implementations of a Semantic Desktop, do you actually want one?
    No, I neither need nor want a "semantic desktop". And, apart from that, the name "semantic desktop" is surely a misnomer. It's a part of KDE that I have no use for, though I admit that I have not bothered to turn it off.
    openSUSE Leap 15.3; KDE Plasma 5.18.6;

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    23,699
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Quote Originally Posted by nrickert View Post
    It's a part of KDE that I have no use for, though I admit that I have not bothered to turn it off.
    I share the same view- not used but leaving as it is for now. (I briefly disabled it just to show others how to.)

  4. #4

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    I've been pestering any KDE guys that would listen that the majority of users out there don't use all the bells and whistles that comes along with the install....but, I'm just a face in the crowd. I agree they should be there for those that need them, yet it's just a waste of resources for users like me. This type of discussion usually branches into memory use, but my beef is with the wasted cpu cycles. Silly me. I am very hopeful and pray that the KlyDE project gathers some steam and support (hint hint) and produces another release...and then I'll beg Evergreen to support it. Yes, I live in a dream world. my 2 centavos.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    where I am is where I am
    Posts
    1,190

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    I voted Possibly. I've been giving baloo a tryout as I found Nepomuk caused me the CPU problems most here speak of. Also, as a search tool it was... it was... A MESS!
    So far here's what I found.
    1) Yes the there is much CPU use by baloo at 1st. In my case on a 500G HDD It took about 6 hours. Unlike Nepomuk to date baloo hasn't taken very much since that initial 6 hours. Nepomuk would randomly take chunks of CPU time & then slow everything else.
    2) Baloo according to the KDE blogs I've read was their most recent effort to try & make The Semantic Desktop useful, with the addition of the Milou widget I've found it useful so far. For those interested one can add this repo:
    http://download.opensuse.org/reposit...openSUSE_13.1/

    to get the milou widget.
    3) With the addition of the milou widget I've found that I can click on it to find any file that i can think of the name or part of that name.
    An example:
    I'll want a certain file ThatGirl. I have 2 files with that name, ThatGirl (a txt file)& thatgirl3(a jpg).
    I'll click on the milou widget which I have in my panel a box will show. In it I'll type "thatgi" then those 2 files
    show up in a list just above the box. Selecting "thatgirl3" I then get a small box with the the pic that is that file.
    Showing me where it is in my case ~/Documents/favimages/
    Selecting "ThatGirl" then I get a box with the Text that is that file & showing me where it is in my case ~/Documents/Stories/
    Do I need the Semantic Desktop?
    For me & I do stress for me I'm giving it a try to see if I do. I sometimes only remember certain parts of a file not the whole name, and sometimes I forget where I put it. This is the situation that the SD was for IIRC.
    Now in the scenario I gave above without SD if I wanted to find "ThatGirl" I'd have manually gone through Dolphin trying to find it because I have moved it around a few times. Doing it this way takes much time. I used to use Krusader but for me it sometimes missed files.(something endemic to my system I'd guess) So I took it out. So far with baloo this hasn't been a problem.
    With SD just 2-3 clicks & There It Is!
    As stated Nepomuk was just mukked up, but baloo just may get me into the idea of a Semantic Desktop.
    I'm just a curious cat
    My 64 bit: CPU AMD RYZEN 9 3900X 12 Core GPU MSI Radeon RX5600 XT
    MOTHERBOARD GIGABYTE B550 AORUS PRO AC
    Opensuse Tumbleweed Plasma 5

  6. #6

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Back in the days of Beagle, I disabled it. Then came Nepomuk, disabled that. In the future, I'll be doing the same with Baloo, I imagine. It would be nice if these things were an option, disabled by default. But I guess I can disable it myself, as always. I need my CPU for more important things. I hate when the computer is brought to a standstill for long periods. I'm sure it's useful to some, but I have no use for it. It's not my intention to insult anyone, of course, so I hope it's not taken as such.
    Desktop : Leap 15.1 | KDE Plasma | AMD Phenom II x6 1035T | 8 GB Memory | Integrated Radeon HD4250 | Ext4
    Laptop: Leap 15.2 | KDE Plasma | Intel Core i5 3rd Gen 3320M 2.6GHz | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | 8 GB Memory | Ext4

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Bari (Italy)
    Posts
    58

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Sometimes i need indexing (in-files text search), but i don't need to tag files.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    215

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Yes, for one search.....but it isn't able in baloo :-(
    i find pictures with the help of indexing the exif tags (keywords, comment, ......)

    anyone uses a different soft to find pictures running inside KDE?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    2,033

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Quote Originally Posted by heelstraf View Post
    Yes, for one search.....but it isn't able in baloo :-(
    i find pictures with the help of indexing the exif tags (keywords, comment, ......)

    anyone uses a different soft to find pictures running inside KDE?
    Provided you don't mind no integration with Dolphin or Gwenview, Recoll http://www.lesbonscomptes.com/recoll/ may be worth a look.

    For images, "as is" it indexes EXIF, Makernotes, IPTC, and XMP data.

    Screenshot of a quick search for EXIF "gpslatitude"

    http://paste.opensuse.org/1358b9ff
    Regards, Paul

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    215

    Default Re: Do you actually need a Semantic Desktop?

    Quote Originally Posted by tannington View Post
    Provided you don't mind no integration with Dolphin or Gwenview, Recoll http://www.lesbonscomptes.com/recoll/ may be worth a look.

    For images, "as is" it indexes EXIF, Makernotes, IPTC, and XMP data.

    Screenshot of a quick search for EXIF "gpslatitude"

    http://paste.opensuse.org/1358b9ff
    positive: controle over the database, fast, complete search options, ....
    negative: why is that not possible in baloo (to use direct in dolhpin);-)

    i think Recoll is staying here, thx :-)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •