Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 12.1 XFCE Yast displays gray boxes instead of checkboxes/checkmarks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Frederick, Maryland
    Posts
    9

    Angry 12.1 XFCE Yast displays gray boxes instead of checkboxes/checkmarks

    Hello!

    I had this problem before and was able to find a solution via Google to fix this, but - alas - I have been unable to find the solution since I installed on a different machine.

    Fully patched system and when I open Yast, the packages that are not installed do not have a checkbox next to them and the ones that are installed merely have a gray box beside it. If I remember correctly it is only one package that needs to be installed to fix this issue.

    Thanks in advance and apologies for wasting time since I am fairly certain it is an easy fix I am overlooking.

    Cheers,
    Czar.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Frederick, Maryland
    Posts
    9

    Default Re: 12.1 XFCE Yast displays gray boxes instead of checkboxes/checkmarks

    Quick follow-up,

    I have tried reinstalling every package I think could be associated with this issue and I have found no resolution to my problem. While I mentioned originally that I only had this problem in Yast, it can be reproduced in any program that requires checkboxes to be checked. Instead of an empty box, it is blank space and if it is checked, it is a gray box.

    Again, thanks n advance for your help.

    Josh

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Frederick, Maryland
    Posts
    9

    Default Re: 12.1 XFCE Yast displays gray boxes instead of checkboxes/checkmarks

    I switched to the Qt interface for the time being, so Yast is at least usable. However, the problem exists elsewhere in the environment.

    Any suggestions?

    Thanks!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    25,547

    Default Re: 12.1 XFCE Yast displays gray boxes instead of checkboxes/checkmarks

    On 2012-01-22 18:36, Czarcasmo wrote:
    > Thanks in advance and apologies for wasting time since I am fairly
    > certain it is an easy fix I am overlooking.


    No, it is a bug. I think I saw the report in Bugzilla. Search there, if not
    find, report.

    --
    Cheers / Saludos,

    Carlos E. R.
    (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •