Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: npcfs crashes if copy job netware 5.1 mounted volume via ncpmount tcp or ipx is done

  1. #1

    Default npcfs crashes if copy job netware 5.1 mounted volume via ncpmount tcp or ipx is done

    After update 11.2 to 11.4 copy jobs from netware 5.1 volume to local disk linux system does crash after a couple of seconds. I might have to do if there a allot of small files in that job. If happend system reboot is required because unmount netware volume nor delete copied files to the local linux system is not possible.

    Recompiling ncpfs package not possible because error free source package ncpfs version 2.2.6 might not be availble.

    Error message:
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764721] ------------[ cut here ]------------
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764730] kernel BUG at /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-desktop-2.6.37.6/linux-2.6.37/include/linux/dcache.h
    :340!
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764738] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764744] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/ncpfs-1/uevent
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764749] CPU 0
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764752] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 ncpfs vmnet parport_pc vmblock vsock vmci vmmon snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer
    _oss snd_seq snd_seq_device edd nvidia(P) af_packet cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave powernow_k8 mperf fuse usblp snd
    _intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_timer snd edac_core ppdev shpchp soundcore snd_page_alloc floppy pci_hotplug parport i2c_nforce
    2 joydev k8temp forcedeth edac_mce_amd pcspkr button sg sr_mod cdrom ext4 jbd2 crc16 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_snapshot dm_mod fan p
    rocessor ata_generic thermal thermal_sys sata_nv pata_amd [last unloaded: vmblock]
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764817]
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764821] Pid: 13366, comm: kio_file Tainted: P 2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop #1 MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL
    CO., LTD MS-7125/MS-7125
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764832] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81166886>] [<ffffffff81166886>] d_validate+0x116/0x120
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764844] RSP: 0018:ffff880001e1fdf8 EFLAGS: 00010246
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764848] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88007492be00 RCX: 0000000000000013
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764854] RDX: ffff88007492be00 RSI: 00003ffffffff000 RDI: ffff88007492be00
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764859] RBP: ffffc90000000000 R08: ffff880000000000 R09: ffff880069a3b078
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764865] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000004f47f
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764870] R13: 9e37fffffffc0001 R14: 0000000000000013 R15: 018721e09fdf187b
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764876] FS: 00007fecb8449760(0000) GS:ffff8800d7c00000(0000) knlGS:00000000f7264710
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764882] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764886] CR2: 000000000070f000 CR3: 00000000311d5000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764892] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764898] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764903] Process kio_file (pid: 13366, threadinfo ffff880001e1e000, task ffff8800064ae0c0)
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764909] Stack:
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764912] ffff8800a901c000 ffff88007492be00 ffff8800d00abc60 ffff8800a901c000
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764920] ffff8800cf764300 ffff8800d00abc00 ffffea00024f8620 ffffffffa018f1aa
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764928] ffff880049415080 00000000000003fe ffff880001e1ff48 ffffffff81163ac0
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764935] Call Trace:
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764952] [<ffffffffa018f1aa>] ncp_readdir+0x41a/0x710 [ncpfs]
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764974] [<ffffffff81163dd0>] vfs_readdir+0xc0/0xe0
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764982] [<ffffffff81163fbf>] sys_getdents64+0x7f/0xf0
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764991] [<ffffffff81002f8b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.765002] [<00007fecb5b13b1a>] 0x7fecb5b13b1a
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.765006] Code: 20 8b 03 85 c0 74 24 3e ff 03 b8 01 00 00 00 e9 60 ff ff ff 90 e8 eb 8a f6 ff 31 c0 e9 53 f
    f ff ff b8 01 00 00 00 e9 49 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 8b 15 6a ea 9b 00 53 48 c7 c6 ff
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.765010] RIP [<ffffffff81166886>] d_validate+0x116/0x120
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.765010] RSP <ffff880001e1fdf8>
    May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.767302] ---[ end trace 1917b69bac094edb ]---

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    25,547

    Default Re: npcfs crashes if copy job netware 5.1 mounted volume via ncpmounttcp or ipx is done

    On 2011-05-23 21:06, thfries wrote:
    > Error message:
    > May 22 19:31:03 jaci kernel: [ 4694.764721] ------------[ cut here
    > ]------------


    Report in bugzilla.

    --
    Cheers / Saludos,

    Carlos E. R.
    (from 11.2 x86_64 "Emerald" at Telcontar)

  3. #3

    Default Re: npcfs crashes if copy job netware 5.1 mounted volume via ncpmount tcp or ipx is done

    Report to bugzilla is done:
    ID 695503 - ncpfs.ko crashes if access netware 5.1 server mounted via ncpmount tcp or ipx

    THX - Thomas

  4. #4

    Default Re: npcfs crashes if copy job netware 5.1 mounted volume via ncpmount tcp or ipx is done

    Well - up to now I received no response regarding report at bugzilla .... :-(

    Thomas

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    25,547

    Default Re: npcfs crashes if copy job netware 5.1 mounted volume via ncpmounttcp or ipx is done

    On 2011-06-01 10:36, thfries wrote:
    >
    > Well - up to now I received no response regarding report at bugzilla
    > ... :-(


    Yes, it is unfortunate, bugzilla reports are almost not solved nowdays.
    Perhaps they are understaffed. :-(

    But it is a kernel bug, they have to be reported, and they are the only
    people capable to correct those. Be patient... for some bugs I had to wait
    years.

    --
    Cheers / Saludos,

    Carlos E. R.
    (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •