Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Another FireFox question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Montana, USA
    Posts
    550

    Default Another FireFox question

    On my computer, I'm using 11.3, KDE 4.4.4 and Firefox 3.6.8.

    Firefox is so s...l...o...w..... It's slow loading and it's slow browsing. Konqueror takes 1, maybe 2 seconds to load, and another second to load the home page. Firefox takes a good 30 seconds to load. The only message I get when loading from a terminal is about not using a shared database. I don't hear the disk churning like it would with a fragmented disk.

    I can't believe everyone is having this response, the hue and cry would be enormous! Anything to try? Should I try loading another browser? I tried Opera on 11.2 and didn't really like it, had problems with a lot of content. What about Sea Monkey (Gad, I HATE words with monkey in them!)

    Konqueror won't show a lot of videos and I have problems using the back and forward buttons. I'll wait for fixes but in the meantime.... What to use?

    Bart

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    /dev/swat
    Posts
    1,181

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    Would suggest to use Chrome.
    Available in Contrib repo from software repositories.
    Linux[openSUSE, KDE], PHP, MySQL, Wordpress, Tech News, etc :
    http://anl4u.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Earth - Denmark
    Posts
    10,730

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    montana suse user wrote:

    > Anything to try?


    1. put a stop watch on it, is it a good 30 seconds, or only ;-) 29??

    so, how many different add-ons have you added?

    2. disable them ALL! try your stop watch again...how much now?

    3. Menu > Edit > Preferences > Main....what is in the "When Firefox
    starts" block? Change it to either "Show a blank page" *or* point to a
    page on YOUR computer *or* decide on a _quick_ loading external page
    you might want, say Google.com, BUT instead of actually setting it to
    go to Google, try 66.102.13.106 instead (and cut out that time wasted
    via the DNS process). try the stop watch again!

    4. other things you might investigate:

    a. Menu > Edit > Preferences > Privacy
    -dial history back to 0 days

    b. Menu > Edit > Preferences > Security
    -uncheck "Tell me if the site I'm visiting is a suspected attack site"
    -uncheck "Tell me if the site I'm visiting is a suspected forgery"
    -turn off those "warning messages" you can deal with

    HEY! if you do those, be careful, ok??

    c. there used to be lots of hints (somewhere on the net) about
    speeding up Firefox....CAREFUL, and look for those which can be
    applied to YOUR version of Firefox

    d. i have no real idea which version of Firefox comes with 11.3, but i
    can say: it is my experience that almost without fail each new Firefox
    has more new features AND is a little bigger and a little
    slower...consider using an older, smaller, faster version... (my
    3.0.14 is also slow....but FAR FAR faster than my friend's MSIE!!)

    e. give the others browsers a try.....i guess the closer they come to
    giving all the features you now have in Firefox, the closer they will
    be to Firefox speed (or lack thereof)

    let us know how sweet is the spot you can find (features vs speed)..

    --
    DenverD
    CAVEAT: http://is.gd/bpoMD [posted via NNTP w/openSUSE 10.3]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    405

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    Quote Originally Posted by montana_suse_user View Post
    On my computer, I'm using 11.3, KDE 4.4.4 and Firefox 3.6.8.

    Firefox is so s...l...o...w..... It's slow loading and it's slow browsing. Konqueror takes 1, maybe 2 seconds to load, and another second to load the home page. Firefox takes a good 30 seconds to load. The only message I get when loading from a terminal is about not using a shared database. I don't hear the disk churning like it would with a fragmented disk.

    I can't believe everyone is having this response, the hue and cry would be enormous! Anything to try? Should I try loading another browser? I tried Opera on 11.2 and didn't really like it, had problems with a lot of content. What about Sea Monkey (Gad, I HATE words with monkey in them!)

    Konqueror won't show a lot of videos and I have problems using the back and forward buttons. I'll wait for fixes but in the meantime.... What to use?

    Bart
    I'm using Seamonkey 2.0.6 on openSUSE 11.2, Gnome 2.28, and it is faster than FF 3.6.8, but my FF isn't as slow as yours loading, never slow browsing unless I'm using bandwidth elsewhere.

    The only problem with SM is the browser sniffing issue. Most sites sniff for FF, so SM doesn't work on them. One fix is to change the general.useragent.extra.seamonkey value in about:config to something like Seamonkey/2.0.6(not Firefox/3.6.8), another is the User Agent Switcher extension.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    Why not just closing FF, renaming your ~/.mozilla directory and restarting FF ? This will bring the default settings back and tell you if an extension is causing the problem. Running firefox from a terminal (just type "firefox") might also provide some information.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Montana, USA
    Posts
    550

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    1. put a stop watch on it, is it a good 30 seconds, or only ;-) 29??
    Well alright, I was rounding my figures. It is, as you say, only 29 and once in a while as fast as 28! (Don't you dare question the accuracy of my stopwatch!)

    I tried renaming my .mozilla directory as please_try_again suggested, and restarting FF. It's still quite slow as compared to Konqueror.

    I'm afraid to install the Google app mmarif4u suggested, they have such a bad rep for snooping!

    I installed SeaMonkey and it is, as rafter22 said, a little faster, but only a little.

    I installed Opera and it is acceptable, but I can't remember why I took offense at it before.

    I installed Epiphany. It FLIES! But, videos show some sort of problem, black flashes kind of like static. I have the same problem with mplayer. I would guess that's what Epiphany is using.

    I can, of course, get by with having Konqueror as my default and pasting videos to Firefox when I need to. I like Epiphany, but it sure isn't as "pretty" as the kde apps! (I bet *that* starts a flame war!)

    Maybe I just need a faster computer!

    Bart

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The English Lake District. UK - GMT/BST
    Posts
    36,733
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    Leap 15.1_KDE
    My Articles Was I any help? If yes: Click the star below

  8. #8

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    Maybe we should have started here: what computer do you have ?
    I can imagine that FF would take 30s or more to start on an i586 but ... you wouldn't get openSUSE 11.3 installed (that easily) on an i586. :-D
    Opera has always been (significantly) faster than Firefox, specially on old machines where you can tell the difference.
    Chromium is fast but it creates one process for each new tab/window. So if you open 100 pages in Chromium ... (I never tried though).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Earth - Denmark
    Posts
    10,730

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    montana suse user wrote:
    > It's still quite slow as compared to Konqueror.


    yep...as far as i know all browsers are quite slow compared to Konqueror..

    --
    DenverD
    CAVEAT: http://is.gd/bpoMD [posted via NNTP w/openSUSE 10.3]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Montana, USA
    Posts
    550

    Default Re: Another FireFox question

    Quote Originally Posted by please_try_again View Post
    Maybe we should have started here: what computer do you have ?
    I can imagine that FF would take 30s or more to start on an i586 but ... you wouldn't get openSUSE 11.3 installed (that easily) on an i586. :-D
    Opera has always been (significantly) faster than Firefox, specially on old machines where you can tell the difference.
    Chromium is fast but it creates one process for each new tab/window. So if you open 100 pages in Chromium ... (I never tried though).
    I'm using a AMD 3000+ on an ASUS board with 2G ram. The disk(s) are SATA drives. Thing is, FF is much quicker in WinXP. That makes me sad! Perhaps I'm asking too much.

    Bart

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •