Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

  1. #11

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Hello RBrownCCB,

    Thanks for the response; thanks for the good info!

    I have not tried one-click in a while, or more accurately, have not allowed the one-click process to proceed further that the screen where it informs the user what it is going to do. At this point, I end the process and perform the task manually. I don't trust one-click ...

    Zypper .... hmmmmm .... so it is a feature and not a bug .... NICE!
    Your response certainly enriches my understanding of some of the problems I've encountered over the past couple of years.

    Thanks again!

    Charles Wight

  2. #12

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    LOL!

    An admin broke my code! I'll never get rid of one-click now ....

  3. #13

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Aww, and you thought we didn't know how it works Oxala.
    LOL!

    2 points for team SuSE!

  4. #14

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    See https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553857 for just ONE example of the (f)utility of filing a bug report about anything related to the real issue here ...
    I will take that as an example, that's all. If you want to say the full bugzilla report system is broken (for anything related to the real issue here) and doesn't works you will need a bigger sample.
    Between, I assigned the bug to the maintainer. Being August I don't know if he is in holidays, but now you have higher probabilities of that bug being read for someone that cares.

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    The real issue:

    getting openSUSE to work with restricted formats is much more complicated and difficult than it should be; OpenSUSE can do better; ... don't believe me ... take Fedora's latest offering for a test drive ....
    If you want openSUSE system to be more Fedora-like... you could explain how Fedora does it. No, I'm not going to install another distro just to try to understand a random forum post.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UTC+10
    Posts
    9,683
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Works fine for me. I one-clicked on codecs-kde.ymp, let it change the vendor on a couple of RPMs, let it install and 10 minutes later I was up and running. Then I disabled the third-party repos it added. Wads da broblem?

  6. #16

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Hello again RedDwarf,

    I will take that as an example, that's all
    ... and that is all it was presented to be ... a single example ...

    It's one example to illustrate that clear bug identification and reporting is just that, clear bug identification and reporting ... it will not in and of itself guarentee that the issue will be addressed. Accurate bug reports alone won't get enough attention to make some folks at SuSE think,
    "We really should do this better"
    .

    Bugzilla is not a panecea.

    If you want openSUSE system to be more Fedora-like... you could explain how Fedora does it. No, I'm not going to install another distro just to try to understand a random forum post.
    It is a rhetorical statement; as such, it's not intended to be taken literally, though perhaps you should!

    I don't want openSUSE to be more Fedora-like per-se ... if I did ... I would have titled the post "ditch green for blue ... any takers?"

    Now we get to the good part!

    I can currently identify two distinct aspects that make "restricted format" hadling better on Fedora:

    1. Repository simplicity / the success of OBS

    Install Fedora, install fusion (fusion being the RH equivalent of packman)! Update via yum or pkg-kit ... same results ... every time.

    The success of OBS has led to a multiplicity of repositories. There is often overlap in the contents of the repositories. OpenSUSE introduced repository prioritization in Yast as a means to manage the complexity and potential pitfalls of using multiple repositories with overlapping package sets.

    So Fedora has a distinct advantage in that it does not NEED to juggle repository prioritization as OpenSUSE does.

    Zypper, by design, does not respect the priority settings in Yast. I do not understand why this behavior is thought to be desirable; it appears to cause endless confusion and headaches. This "feature" explains why following an install guide may or may not work. Unless the guide was written with this feature in mind, it will assume zypper mimics yast. Thus following such a guide, depending on how you've configured your repos, what you've already installed, you may or may not get the expected results.


    2. Integration with package-kit

    This seems to be just plain broken on OpenSUSE. It's ironic that the bug I found as an example concerns this integration specifically, is marked MAJOR, and is almost a full year ignored.

    I'll try to discribe how it works in Fedora. Please be aware that I may get some details wrong. I've used FH13 for all of 2 weeks and don't have significant memories of making things work ... everything worked with minimal effort and minimal thought, which is kinda the point of this soapbox. Getting OpenSUSE to play an mp3 should NOT be a memorable experience!

    For restricted formats in Fedora , a single package is needed, it's in thier documentation. From there everything else is packag-kit/gstreamer automagic. Select an mp3 file in rhythmbox ... a window pops up ... "Should I go grab the codec you need?", "Yes, please do" .... and you are listening to an mp3.

    Over the past few years .... the BEST OpenSUSE has done is successfully redirect you to the one-click page, where the one-click may or may not actually get you listening to your mp3 within the week. Other results have included, NOTHING AT ALL, as in the bug I posted here as an example, "Can't find a thing!", "Error, gstreamer needs an mpeg4-aac plugin".

    As another example of this non-itegration, try to use a colorometer with gnome-color-manager on OpenSUSE; it's simply comical. Try it on FC13; it simply works! And for comically absurd, read the response to the bug report I filed.

    Maybe I'm just tired ... but as I think about the bug reports I've read, the forum posts, the endless defensive comments from OpenSUSE folks, the general attitude of complacancy about the os, the "it works fine unless you're stupid" arrogant debianesque "users don't matter" attiude .... I'm beginning to think this is just going nowhere!

    Oh well ... SuSE was an awesome product in it's day!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Finland, European Union
    Posts
    1,879

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    Try it on FC13; it simply works!
    That explains why Fedora Bugzilla is practically empty related to multimedia, stability or package issues, heh.

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    I'm beginning to think this is just going nowhere!
    You, like most ranters, complain a lot but offer no tangible solutions to issues. Everything you write hours on end have already been written hundred times over and are well known to both the developers and the support staff like say us on #suse.

    You want to improve the product? Give realistic suggestions that are possible to implement with the current resources and legal ramifications or improve it yourself by submitting patches, don't rant - it only provokes people.

  8. #18

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Quote Originally Posted by Chrysantine View Post
    You, like most ranters, complain a lot but offer no tangible solutions to issues. Everything you write hours on end have already been written hundred times over and are well known to both the developers and the support staff like say us on #suse.

    You want to improve the product? Give realistic suggestions that are possible to implement with the current resources and legal ramifications or improve it yourself by submitting patches, don't rant - it only provokes people.
    How many users have the ability to write patches?
    How many users are programmers?

    How many users work in a bakery?

    There are plenty of us who lack the ability to do as you suggest. The only way we can address issues is simply be stating our opinions, frustrations, problems or offering some sort of critical analysis.

    By doing so we can only hope it will spark positive debate, make more people aware of certain issues, create thought, make change.

    Stop being narrow minded!

    If like you say the same goop has been said hundred of times then there clearly is a consensus within a class of users of a particular issue. It may be a trivial issue but that doesnt mean it isnt a valid issue.

    Are these users wrong to express their opinions?

    What may seem like a rant to one person may be inspiration to another.

  9. #19

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Hello Chrysantine,

    You, like most ranters, complain a lot but offer no tangible solutions to issues
    With the exception of the last paragragh of #16, I would not characterize my words as ranting. Most of what I have written in this thread has been "documenting", or arguing, that a problem actually exists. Ironically, you have clearly explemfied the arrogance I did rant about. Such a lovely choice of words ... I am no longer oxala or Charles Wight or an OpenSUSE user or forum member .... I'm a ranter!

    So you have demostated your superiority with name-calling .... nice!

    I had hoped to get two things out of this excercise:

    1. A better understanding as to the technical underpinnings of the problem
    2. Have a real discussion about making it easier

    A little bit of the first has been accomplished ... I have a much better understanding of some of the snags I've hit in the past due to changes in zypper. As for the second, to some extent, I'm simply being told the problem is not real ... so the discussion becomes more of an argument.

    Consumers typically vote with thier pocket books; consumers of free software typically vote with thier feet. I am trying to find a constructive way, short of voting with my feet, to convey the message ... "this is important!".

    Clearly, I have not found the right vehicle.

  10. #20

    Default Re: openSUSE, multimedia(aka restricted formats), zypper, one-click, reop#17410, nightmare

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    It's one example to illustrate that clear bug identification and reporting is just that, clear bug identification and reporting ... it will not in and of itself guarentee that the issue will be addressed. Accurate bug reports alone won't get enough attention to make some folks at SuSE think, .

    Bugzilla is not a panecea.
    Bugzilla is the best chance you have to have a bug fixed.

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    1. Repository simplicity / the success of OBS

    Install Fedora, install fusion (fusion being the RH equivalent of packman)! Update via yum or pkg-kit ... same results ... every time.

    The success of OBS has led to a multiplicity of repositories. There is often overlap in the contents of the repositories. OpenSUSE introduced repository prioritization in Yast as a means to manage the complexity and potential pitfalls of using multiple repositories with overlapping package sets.

    So Fedora has a distinct advantage in that it does not NEED to juggle repository prioritization as OpenSUSE does.
    More packages could be pushed to the main repo (or Contrib). But the extra repositories still have its use (not that a normal user can't be happy with only the main repo), so they will stay. So, since the many repos from OBS will stay there, what fix do you propose? (I could propose one, but I would need a detailed description of what a normal user does and what goes wrong)

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    Zypper, by design, does not respect the priority settings in Yast.
    Wrong, it does. Priorities are at ZYpp level, not at application level.

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    2. Integration with package-kit

    This seems to be just plain broken on OpenSUSE. It's ironic that the bug I found as an example concerns this integration specifically, is marked MAJOR, and is almost a full year ignored.
    The reporter set the priority, IMHO it should be Normal. Sometimes bugs get old without nobody noticing them, sure... you can vote them (it has 0 votes), or assign to the correct people to make them more visible.

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    For restricted formats in Fedora , a single package is needed, it's in thier documentation. From there everything else is packag-kit/gstreamer automagic. Select an mp3 file in rhythmbox ... a window pops up ... "Should I go grab the codec you need?", "Yes, please do" .... and you are listening to an mp3.
    No idea how this works, so I can't say if it could be applied to openSUSE. But I suppose that "single package" to be available in the Fusion repo, so here you should ask to Packman.

    Quote Originally Posted by oxala View Post
    As another example of this non-itegration, try to use a colorometer with gnome-color-manager on OpenSUSE; it's simply comical. Try it on FC13; it simply works! And for comically absurd, read the response to the bug report I filed.
    What's so funny about the answer? You gave a high-level description and Vincent identified the specific part that needs to be fixed... the bug hasn't been closed. It's just that packaging argyllcms would take some time.
    Also, linking to the bug reports you comment is a good practice: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619915

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •