Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 60

Thread: KDE4 = Vista

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    25,954

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    Sorry about the 95/98. In any case not a new invention for me, but I admit that doing this on a microprocessor system with floppy disks instead of on a more powerfull X-terminal that needed some computer room system behind it was maybe amazing.

    In any case this is the Soapbox area and I feel free to rant a bit about features that are lost and new features that I do not see any use for. Like my panel is opaque, to make it more difficult for me to see what is in there .

    I am of course much biased that in my working live I was responsible for continuity. When we had to switch to a new OS level (and in the end you have to as we all know) I had to see that the end users productivity was impacted as less as possible. The engineer that runs some bridge stress program is not interested (to express his feelings lightly) in having the buttons he presses blindly, being moved to another place in his system/application. We even had to forbid the usage of software on the fact that it had no future because of it being based non standard underlying features and the like.
    Henk van Velden

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    /dev/belgium
    Posts
    1,946

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by hcvv View Post
    Sorry about the 95/98. In any case not a new invention for me, but I admit that doing this on a microprocessor system with floppy disks instead of on a more powerfull X-terminal that needed some computer room system behind it was maybe amazing.

    In any case this is the Soapbox area and I feel free to rant a bit about features that are lost and new features that I do not see any use for. Like my panel is opaque, to make it more difficult for me to see what is in there .
    Use a different theme. Mine is too, yet I have no problems seeing what's on it. I have a black opaque panel though

    I am of course much biased that in my working live I was responsible for continuity. When we had to switch to a new OS level (and in the end you have to as we all know) I had to see that the end users productivity was impacted as less as possible. The engineer that runs some bridge stress program is not interested (to express his feelings lightly) in having the buttons he presses blindly, being moved to another place in his system/application. We even had to forbid the usage of software on the fact that it had no future because of it being based non standard underlying features and the like.
    This is not just valid for one piece of software (be it a DE or not) but for most if not all software. Progress/development + time = change. If you can't adapt to this (or your users) maybe you/they are in the wrong business. Almost nothing in life stays the same and some things change (much) faster than others do....

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    25,954

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by microchip8 View Post
    Use a different theme. Mine is too, yet I have no problems seeing what's on it. I have a black opaque panel though
    I know there are answers to most of these practical questions I have and will have, but it is the time consuming way I have to search, to ask and to struggle to get the (IMHO) most basic situations back to normal.

    Quote Originally Posted by microchip8 View Post
    This is not just valid for one piece of software (be it a DE or not) but for most if not all software. Progress/development + time = change. If you can't adapt to this (or your users) maybe you/they are in the wrong business. Almost nothing in life stays the same and some things change (much) faster than others do....
    Again, see the examples above onn 'non computer' things. You are right, but only partly. Almost every thing you have to replace by a ne one is full of new features uyou did not ask for andd that would not be that bad if they were not switched on by default (and often on your first question how to switch them of they will stare blank at you).

    But I agree this all is very personal. I can e.g. not undertand at all why, some days ago, there was somebody here on the forums who wanted his FF updated automaticaly to the newest version as soon as it showed up somewhere. Unbelievable to me. Such an attitude can only create chaos in your system, house and relations, But this is only my opinion.
    Henk van Velden

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Wales, MA
    Posts
    486

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    In order to avoid the complaints of people who don't like pre-configured options, no desktop environment will be included in future releases.

    Also in the future no hardware drivers will be included other then basic componants this of course is to avoid the loading of modules that people don't need.

    In further attempts to reduce complaints, vi, vim, emacs, Midnight Commander, make, cmake............will no longer be included.

    Of course in the spirit of open source they all can be freely downloaded via wget or lynx.

    Remember the choice is yours now, no decisions will be made about any software or window manager preferences.

    New users don't panic when you first boot up, the black screen you see is by design.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    61

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    rofl!!!

    That's a great one , were going back to erm the late90's linux install's yay!!

    Being serious though, Linux is about "Choice" but the choice's for a DE have to come with a base.. A lot of people are complaining about KDE4 while I will admit it can take time to adjust to a new setup or to configure it how you want, that comes with Every OS available not one of them has the "perfect" setup as a base, not one of the DE's will ever be able to achieve that as every user and the way they interact with the PC is different on a lot of levels.

    KDE made a total re-write with KDE4, it's not finished yet but comparing it to Vista is like comparing a Ferrari to a Reliant Robin...

    Please for the sake of all that's human, stop trying to compare KDE to Vista.. Vista is a locked in pos that the only way you can change is by "hacking" system file's to allow it, KDE is not locked in at all gives you the options to change every part of the structure (pretty much).

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    /dev/belgium
    Posts
    1,946

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by hcvv View Post
    I know there are answers to most of these practical questions I have and will have, but it is the time consuming way I have to search, to ask and to struggle to get the (IMHO) most basic situations back to normal.
    Most new things a person has to adopt to are time consuming and this is not just related to computers so your comment doesn't make much of a point. When you're in a new situation you don't understand, you also try to find out facts/knowledge/etc about all that is involved in order to make sense out of it or make a better judgment... that takes time and work too coupled with adaptivity to new circumstances. When you install a brand new program, even if you are familiar with the field that program is targeted at, you also have to tinker a bit with it until you find your way around. This is no different


    Again, see the examples above onn 'non computer' things. You are right, but only partly. Almost every thing you have to replace by a ne one is full of new features uyou did not ask for andd that would not be that bad if they were not switched on by default (and often on your first question how to switch them of they will stare blank at you).

    But I agree this all is very personal. I can e.g. not undertand at all why, some days ago, there was somebody here on the forums who wanted his FF updated automaticaly to the newest version as soon as it showed up somewhere. Unbelievable to me. Such an attitude can only create chaos in your system, house and relations, But this is only my opinion.
    You're thinking locally and selfishly too.... you did not ask for these things? Sure/maybe you didn't, but I'm sure someone else has and to him/her they may be needed. From reading your posts, I conclude that you are asking for a system that is perfectly fitted to your own needs and habit. I have a small surprise for you.... No such general purpose system exists, certainly not a general purpose OS like Linux distro. If you want everything the way you want it and only have the things you need and organized in a specific manner, then either start coding your system/OS yourself, or grab all that you need and build your own Henk Linux distro that fits you perfectly (there's this thing called Linux from scratch which may help you). Fact is that there's no way of developing a general purpose desktop environment targeted at millions of people, yet at the same time making it in a way that fits the needs/habits/etc of all those people on individual basis. That currently is just not possible

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in Fictionland
    Posts
    1,479

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by hcvv View Post
    I can e.g. not undertand at all why, some days ago, there was somebody here on the forums who wanted his FF updated automaticaly to the newest version as soon as it showed up somewhere. Unbelievable to me. Such an attitude can only create chaos in your system, house and relations, But this is only my opinion.
    Probably that person is concerned about features or about security flaws (s)he has to fixed right now. And for security fixes it is also good to have them fixed asap.

    What I do not understand about your argumentation is the following:
    As of 11.1 you where perfectly free to have a working system on KDE3.5. If you do not like change, why did you update anyway? You could have stayed with the previous kernel and with the previous desktop. But obviously there is something that pushed you to change.
    If I well understand, as long as 4.x stays actual, it will not require much work between the releases. So the time you invest right now is an opportunity cost you should consider distributed on all the coming releases of 4. There is one rant I see already arriving like the spring, it is the change of mail and address-books to use from then on the "Akonadi" framework . Guess the wolf howling if that is not well done......
    All over all, you had the choice to do exactly like you proposed: not to update, not to move. So why did you ?
    Just "clicking away" security warnings about a change in repo signature ? Not able to control?
    Then please vote for
    https://features.opensuse.org/312047
    openSUSE should have an efficient web of trust.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wilds of Arkansas
    Posts
    198

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    The computer industry practice, and Open Source exemplifies this, is to toss out the baby with the bath water. Microchip says this provides innovation and new features. Henk complains of losing features that are time tested and stable. If Win98 still worked on newer hardware/software and modern Internet services the operation of it served me just fine. I gave it up when it no longer could operate on new hardware/software and went to Linux because of the requirements that Windows imposed with XP to register each time you loaded XP on a computer. It was the "You do not own what you paid for" Microsoft philosophy that caused me to seek alternatives. The big reason why people did not leave XP for Vista is because the benefits did not out way the distractions that Vista created. (Second hand information gleaned from reading about Vistas problems).

    For me, that is bit old for computers (I always felt growing up that they were glorified calculators and typewriters), new features that add to usage are great to have but why lose functionality in the process? Breaking things, like they did to go to the Kde 4 series, just to somehow have a better to maintain and code for system (I only have statements for this from those that may have a conflict of interest, I lack ability to confirm independently for myself) is not a great way to do things. I do think Distros should stop inventing the wheel and get down to just making better applications and stop changing the desktop environment. It begins to seem like the Detroit Auto days of the 50's where cars competed on adding chrome and fins.

    I hate having to go buy a hammer to find the type I like to be discontinued for a new one that sports a "improved interface". And when roofing, if you need a hammer, the coil roofing nail gun just does not substitute for it.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    /dev/belgium
    Posts
    1,946

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by MattBClassic View Post
    The computer industry practice, and Open Source exemplifies this, is to toss out the baby with the bath water. Microchip says this provides innovation and new features. Henk complains of losing features that are time tested and stable. If Win98 still worked on newer hardware/software and modern Internet services the operation of it served me just fine. I gave it up when it no longer could operate on new hardware/software and went to Linux because of the requirements that Windows imposed with XP to register each time you loaded XP on a computer. It was the "You do not own what you paid for" Microsoft philosophy that caused me to seek alternatives. The big reason why people did not leave XP for Vista is because the benefits did not out way the distractions that Vista created. (Second hand information gleaned from reading about Vistas problems).
    .
    I don't just argue about innovation and new features, Matt. It's more complex than that. Losing features is a subjective thing. To give you an example, me as an ex poweruser of KDE3, never even used 70% of all that was present in KDE3's konqueror file manager. Some people who did use them of course complained some were removed in KDE4. People like me who never touched them or had a need for these features, you don't hear complain.... it's a subjective thing and depends on the person and his workflow and habits. I always wanted a small, simple, fast, not-stuffed-like-a-pig-with-gazillion-of-options-I'll-never-use file manager for KDE and now I got one in the form of Dolphin. Of course, there are enough people who dislike it, but Dolphin suits my workflow just perfectly; all I need is an easy and simple graphical way to navigate fast through the directory structure. What good are all those features if I'd never touch them?.... See where I'm going? And this is exactly why arguments like "I didn't ask for it" are just wrong. What I may need may not be suited for someone else. One way to semi-solve this is to offer choice so the user himself can decide which fits him better, but there's a (small?) negative effect to too much choice. It's confusion on the user's side. So many gazillion of programs to choose from that all try to do the same, so many options, so many this and that, which do I choose?, etc....

    But yes, as innovation and development keep progressing, some features get phased out and/or replaced by new ones which may not be something a "habit stuck up user" agrees with and he'll definitely try to resist change and be vocal about it. The Linux world isn't known to sit on its butt and wait for all to come. It's a very fast moving platform where a technology introduced only a few years ago could become obsolete this or the next year (see the case with HAL (Linux' hardware abstraction) and DeviceKit, both of which are young technologies yet being phased out (and some parts of them merged with) in favor of udev/libudev). In the Linux world, if one wants "trusted" technology that doesn't change that often compared to community distros, he should look into enterprise Linux solutions. But even enterprise solutions will change at some point, albeit much later. This is inevitable as it's a requirement for progress/innovation (not all that is "trusted" can be made compatible with future technology and will often need a rewrite or reimplementation to be adapted to future technology/standards)

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wilds of Arkansas
    Posts
    198

    Default Re: KDE4 = Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by microchip8 View Post
    Losing features is a subjective thing. To give you an example, me as an ex poweruser of KDE3, never even used 70% of all that was present in KDE3's konqueror file manager. ....
    Actually no, Subjective would only apply if the feature was still there but not still not used by you. The feature not being there at all means it is a objective loss. Many valuable things to others are changed by this. You may have even found in time a feature of the old way was very useful and needed. However you now do not have the opportunity because it is gone.

    You mention Dolphin as being better for your usage than Konq. I could almost like Dolphin if it stopped crashing every few times it gets used. However Konq for me as a file manager worked for what I wanted and I knew its interface (Probably only about 1% not being a power user). I never had it crash that I can recall. Now will I adapt to the new ways of Kde 4+, sure, but that does make me blind to its shortcomings.

    It would have been interesting if MS had discontinued XP (completely and no updates or bug fixes) with the release of Vista. How would things be today if they had not caved and kept XP around?

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •